IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i3p293-d1346370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can a Crop Rotation and Fallow System Reduce the Carbon Emission Intensity of Agriculture?

Author

Listed:
  • Xuefeng Zhang

    (Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Hui Sun

    (Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Xuechao Xia

    (Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Zedong Yang

    (Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Shusen Zhu

    (Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

Abstract

Under the carbon emission pattern of “peak carbon and carbon neutrality”, the policy of crop rotation and fallow system (CRFS) is regarded as an important initiative to promote the green, low-carbon, and high-quality development of agriculture. Focusing on balanced panel data from 30 provinces in China from 2010 to 2021, this paper empirically examines the impact of CRFS on agricultural carbon emissions (ACEI) and its internal mechanism using a multi-temporal difference-in-differences model. The benchmark regression results show that CRFS can significantly reduce ACEI, and the results remain robust after validation by multiple methods. Mechanism results show that CRFS is able to reduce ACEI by reducing factor mismatch and promoting the level of agricultural services. Heterogeneity analysis results show that the arable land fallow rotation system is more conducive to promoting the reduction in agricultural carbon emission intensity in the main grain producing areas, main grain marketing areas, high land transfer areas, and plantation areas than in the grain production and marketing balanced areas, low land transfer, and animal husbandry areas. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the CRFS policy implementation, provides a doctrinal basis for expanding the scope of CRFS implementation, and provides policy recommendations for relevant departments to improve the CRFS policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuefeng Zhang & Hui Sun & Xuechao Xia & Zedong Yang & Shusen Zhu, 2024. "Can a Crop Rotation and Fallow System Reduce the Carbon Emission Intensity of Agriculture?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:293-:d:1346370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/3/293/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/3/293/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianli Sui & Wenqiang Lv, 2021. "Crop Production and Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Relationship Diagnosis and Decomposition Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Gregory D. Graff & Gordon C. Rausser & Arthur A. Small, 2003. "Agricultural Biotechnology's Complementary Intellectual Assets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 85(2), pages 349-363, May.
    3. Xiaoxuan Chen & Tongshan Liu, 2023. "Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote the Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer? Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Farm Size," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aristide Giuliano & Massimiliano Errico & Hamid Salehi & Pasquale Avino, 2022. "Environmental Impact Assessment by Green Processes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-4, November.
    2. Jie Huang & Zimin Sun & Pengshu Zhong, 2022. "The Spatial Disequilibrium and Dynamic Evolution of the Net Agriculture Carbon Effect in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Yiqun Wu & Yuan Sun & Congyue Zhou & Yonghua Li & Xuanli Wang & Huifang Yu, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Carbon Emissions in Mixed-Use Villages: A Sustainable Development Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Tao He & Xiuwei Lin & Yongli Qu & Chunbo Wei, 2023. "Study on the Relationship between Economic Growth of Animal Husbandry and Carbon Emission Based on Logarithmic Average Index Method and Decoupling Model: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Gregory D. Graff & David Roland-Holst & David Zilberman, 2005. "Biotechnology and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2005-27, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Oyetade, Oluwatoyese Oluwapemi & Adeyeye, Oluwaseun, 2024. "Higher Derivative Block Method Forecast Analysis of Agricultural Components and their Impact on Economic Growth," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 12(01), January.
    7. Guanghe Han & Jiahui Xu & Xin Zhang & Xin Pan, 2024. "Efficiency and Driving Factors of Agricultural Carbon Emissions: A Study in Chinese State Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Beihe Wu & Yan Guo & Zhaojiu Chen & Liguo Wang, 2024. "Do Agricultural Productive Services Impact the Carbon Emissions of the Planting Industry in China: Promotion or Inhibition?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Qiaoni Yang & Ningning Zhang & Qianwen Lu & Xinru Han, 2023. "Family Net Income, Input Factor Prices and Agriculture Services Selection Behavior of Maize Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Eran Binenbaum, 2005. "Towards a Relational Economics," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2005-04, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    11. Nancy T. Gallini, 2002. "The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 131-154, Spring.
    12. Pardey, Philip G. & Koo, Bonwoo & Nottenburg, Carol, 2004. "Creating, Protecting, And Using Crop Biotechnologies Worldwide In An Era Of Intellectual Property," Staff Papers 13600, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Binenbaum, Eran, 2003. "The Intellectual Property Strategy of International Agricultural Research Centres," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57835, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Goodhue, Rachael E. & Rausser, Gordon C., 2003. "Value Differentiation," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Oehmke, James F. & Wolf, Christopher A. & Weatherspoon, Dave D. & Naseem, Anwar & Maredia, Mywish K. & Raper, Kellie Curry & Hightower, Amie L., 1999. "Cyclical Concentration And Consolidation In Biotech R&D: A Neo-Schumpeterian Model," Staff Paper Series 11812, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    16. Chao Hu & Jin Fan & Jian Chen, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Drivers of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Jiangsu Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Pengnan Xiao & Yuan Zhang & Peng Qian & Mengyao Lu & Zupeng Yu & Jie Xu & Chong Zhao & Huilin Qian, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics, Decoupling Effect and Driving Factors of Carbon Emission from Cultivated Land Utilization in Hubei Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-32, July.
    18. Xiaocheng Wang & Chenxi Yang & Cuixia Qiao, 2024. "Agricultural Service Trade and Green Development: A Perspective Based on China’s Agricultural Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    19. Shi, Guanming & Stiegert, Kyle W. & Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2009. "An Analysis of Pricing in the U.S. Cotton Seed Market," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 51617, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:293-:d:1346370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.