IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2227-d1547731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Carbon Emissions and Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China: The Perspective of Ecological Function Zones

Author

Listed:
  • Yanqing Lang

    (School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Heng Chao

    (School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Jingyu Xiao

    (Shenzhen New Land Tool Planning & Architectural Design Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518172, China)

Abstract

Ecosystem carbon sinks can offset part of the carbon emissions from human activities, playing a significant role in the carbon neutrality process. Clarifying the relationship between carbon emissions and ecosystem services is crucial for achieving the dual goals of carbon neutrality and ecological environmental protection. Effective ecosystem management is a prerequisite for controlling carbon emissions, as well as for ecosystem conservation and restoration, making a significant contribution to emission reduction and the enhancement of ecosystem services. Therefore, this study takes Guangdong Province as an example, starting with ecological functional zones—units that can enhance the effectiveness of ecosystem management—combining multi-source data and localized methods to develop annual carbon emissions (CEs) and ecosystem service value (ESV) data from 2000 to 2020, and reveals the spatiotemporal relationships between CEs and the ESV. The results showed the following from 2000 to 2020: (1) The net CEs increased from 203.73 to 482.80 million tons, representing an increase of 279.07 million tons, or 136.98%. The metropolitan residential security zone (MRSZ) was the dominant carbon source area, accounting for more than 60% of the total net CEs. (2) The total ESV gradually decreased from CNY 596.95 to 504.56 billion, representing a decline of CNY 92.39 billion, or 15.48%. The WCZ had the highest ESV, accounting for more than 50% of the total in all periods. (3) Temporally, the net CEs were negatively correlated with the total ESV in the study area, especially in the MRSZ, while a positive correlation was observed in the agricultural products provision zone (APZ). Spatially, the main clusters were Low–Low and High–Low clusters, primarily distributed in the APZ and MRSZ. This study explores and reveals the spatiotemporal relationship between CEs and the ESV, providing valuable references for related research in Guangdong Province and other regional comparative studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanqing Lang & Heng Chao & Jingyu Xiao, 2024. "The Relationship Between Carbon Emissions and Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China: The Perspective of Ecological Function Zones," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2227-:d:1547731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. A. Bastien-Olvera & M. N. Conte & X. Dong & T. Briceno & D. Batker & J. Emmerling & M. Tavoni & F. Granella & F. C. Moore, 2024. "Unequal climate impacts on global values of natural capital," Nature, Nature, vol. 625(7996), pages 722-727, January.
    2. Gabriele Hegerl & Francis Zwiers, 2011. "Use of models in detection and attribution of climate change," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(4), pages 570-591, July.
    3. Emilia Pramova & Bruno Locatelli & Maria Brockhaus & Sandra Fohlmeister, 2012. "Ecosystem services in the National Adaptation Programmes of Action," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 393-409, July.
    4. Ruijie Zhang & Kanhua Yu & Pingping Luo, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Relationship between Land Use Carbon Emissions and Ecosystem Service Value in Guanzhong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Mercedes M. C. Bustamante & José Salomão Silva & Aldicir Scariot & Alexandre Bonesso Sampaio & Daniel Luis Mascia & Edenise Garcia & Edson Sano & Geraldo Wilson Fernandes & Giselda Durigan & Iris Roit, 2019. "Ecological restoration as a strategy for mitigating and adapting to climate change: lessons and challenges from Brazil," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 1249-1270, October.
    6. Xiuyu Huang & Ying Wang & Wanyi Liang & Zhaojun Wang & Xiao Zhou & Qinqiang Yan, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Low–Carbon Transition of Farmland Use in Coastal Areas of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Guangyue Xu & Peter Schwarz & Xiaojing Shi & Nathan Duma, 2023. "Scenario Paths of Developing Forest Carbon Sinks for China to Achieve Carbon Neutrality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nazmul Huq & Antje Bruns & Lars Ribbe & Saleemul Huq, 2017. "Mainstreaming Ecosystem Services Based Climate Change Adaptation (EbA) in Bangladesh: Status, Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Brian J. Reich & Shu Yang & Yawen Guan & Andrew B. Giffin & Matthew J. Miller & Ana Rappold, 2021. "A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental and Epidemiological Applications," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 605-634, December.
    3. Dapeng Li & Feiyang Pan & Jia He & Zhiwei Xu & Dandan Tu & Guoliang Fan, 2023. "Style Miner: Find Significant and Stable Explanatory Factors in Time Series with Constrained Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2303.11716, arXiv.org.
    4. Fangzhi Wang & Hua Liao & Richard S. J. Tol & Changjing Ji, 2024. "Endogenous Preference for Nonmarket Goods in Carbon Abatement Decisions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 235-251, December.
    5. Sierra-Correa, Paula Cristina & Cantera Kintz, Jaime Ricardo, 2015. "Ecosystem-based adaptation for improving coastal planning for sea-level rise: A systematic review for mangrove coasts," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 385-393.
    6. Rasmussen, Laura Vang, 2018. "Re-Defining Sahelian ‘Adaptive Agriculture’ when Implemented Locally: Beyond Techno-fix Solutions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 274-282.
    7. Nicolas Misailidis Stríkis & Plácido Fabrício Silva Melo Buarque & Francisco William Cruz & Juan Pablo Bernal & Mathias Vuille & Ernesto Tejedor & Matheus Simões Santos & Marília Harumi Shimizu & Ange, 2024. "Modern anthropogenic drought in Central Brazil unprecedented during last 700 years," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Joanne Chong, 2014. "Ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation: progress and challenges," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 391-405, November.
    9. Joseph Holler & Quinn Bernier & J. Timmons Roberts & Stacy-ann Robinson, 2020. "Transformational Adaptation in Least Developed Countries: Does Expanded Stakeholder Participation Make a Difference?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Moritz A. Drupp & Jasper N. Meya & Björn Bos & Simon Disque, 2024. "Heterogeneous Substitutability Preferences," CESifo Working Paper Series 11197, CESifo.
    11. Gyanendra Karki & Balram Bhatta & Naba R Devkota & Ram P Acharya & Ripu M Kunwar, 2021. "Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) Interventions and Indicators in Nepal: Implications for Sustainable Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Fatemeh Firoozi & Ahmad Fakheri Fard & Esmaeil Asadi, 2024. "Detection and Attribution of Meteorological Drought to Anthropogenic Climate Change (Case Study: Ajichay basin, Iran)," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(8), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Fernandes, Stephannie & Fernandes, Geraldo W. & Fearnside, Philip M., 2023. "Viewpoint: Sovereignty and reversing Brazil’s history of Amazon destruction," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Ross McKitrick, 2024. "Total least squares bias in climate fingerprinting regressions with heterogeneous noise variances and correlated explanatory variables," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), March.
    15. Jose A. Algarra & María M. Ramos-Lorente & Paloma Cariñanos, 2024. "Is the Spanish Population Pro-Conservation or Pro-Utilitarian towards Threatened Flora? Social Analysis on the Willingness to Protect Biodiversity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-34, June.
    16. Daniel Osberghaus, 2017. "Prospect theory, mitigation and adaptation to climate change," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 909-930, July.
    17. Haoran Li & Yang Liu & Yixiao Li & Xiaoxi Li & Shuyi Yan & Xi Zheng, 2024. "How to Realize Synergistic Emission Reduction in Future Urban Agglomerations: Spatial Planning Approaches to Reducing Carbon Emissions from Land Use: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Feng Wang & Dominique Arseneault & Étienne Boucher & Fabio Gennaretti & Shulong Yu & Tongwen Zhang, 2022. "Tropical volcanoes synchronize eastern Canada with Northern Hemisphere millennial temperature variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Murakami, Lia Yukari K. & Massi, Klécia Gili & Mendes, Tatiana Sussel G., 2023. "Socioeconomic aspects of riparian vegetation debt in the state of Sao Paulo, Brasil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    20. Jean C. Bikomeye & Caitlin S. Rublee & Kirsten M. M. Beyer, 2021. "Positive Externalities of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation for Human Health: A Review and Conceptual Framework for Public Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-29, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2227-:d:1547731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.