IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2013-d1529618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Identification of Land Use Conflicts and Policy Implications for Donghai County Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological” Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Jianying Xiao

    (Research Center of Digital Rural Service, School of Public Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Jinjin Dai

    (Research Center of Digital Rural Service, School of Public Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Longqian Chen

    (Research Center of Digital Rural Service, School of Public Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Yan Song

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3140, USA)

Abstract

The rapid development of urbanization has continuously encroached on people’s living space and ecological space, leading to an imbalance in territorial spatial functions. Identifying potential land use conflicts and optimizing land use structure are conducive to carrying out territorial spatial planning rationally. In this paper, we adopt the suitability assessment method to evaluate the suitability of land for production, living, and ecological functions and then use the land use conflict identification matrix to identify land use conflicts in Donghai County and make relevant suggestions according to the intensity of land use conflicts. The results of this study show the following: (1) the areas of suitable land use zones, strong conflict zones, medium conflict zones, and weak conflict zones in Donghai County are, respectively, 58.83%, 10.62%, 26.31%, and 4.24%. (2) The spatial distribution differences in the different conflict zones could determine the pertinence of conflict mitigation and spatial planning. In the process of the urbanization of Donghai County, ecological environmental protection is still the top priority. (3) It is necessary to economically and intensively use construction land, improving its fine management level. Land use efficiency should be maximized, and the spatial distribution of national territory should be reasonably optimized while strengthening the guiding role of planning. This study addresses land conflicts from the perspective of spatial planning rather than economic behavior. It also provides significant insight into land use layout at the county level, which is exactly what China is exploring in the new era.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianying Xiao & Jinjin Dai & Longqian Chen & Yan Song, 2024. "The Identification of Land Use Conflicts and Policy Implications for Donghai County Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological” Functions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2013-:d:1529618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shukui Tan & Bin Tong & Junwen Zhang, 2023. "How Did the Land Contract Disputes Evolve? Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Moomen, Abdul–Wadood, 2017. "Strategies for managing large-scale mining sector land use conflicts in the global south," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 85-93.
    3. Florentino Morales & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Establishment of Land Use Suitability Mapping Criteria Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with Practitioners and Beneficiaries," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Xufeng Cui & Fei Li & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Smart Land Use Planning: New Theories, New Tools and New Practice," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-6, June.
    5. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Jiaxing Cui & Xuesong Kong & Jing Chen & Jianwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhu, 2021. "Spatially Explicit Evaluation and Driving Factor Identification of Land Use Conflict in Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junxiong Mo & Piling Sun & Dandan Shen & Nan Li & Jinye Zhang & Kun Wang, 2023. "Simulation Analysis of Land-Use Spatial Conflict in a Geopark Based on the GMOP–Markov–PLUS Model: A Case Study of Yimengshan Geopark, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Yong Liu & Rui Xu & Jixin Yang & Xinpeng Xie & Xufeng Cui, 2024. "Decoding Land Use Conflicts: Spatiotemporal Analysis and Constraint Diagnosis from the Perspectives of Production–Living–Ecological Functions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-33, December.
    3. Jiao Chen & Liwei Zhang & Shan Zhao & Hua Zong, 2023. "Assessing Land-Use Conflict Potential and Its Correlation with LULC Based on the Perspective of Multi-Functionality and Landscape Complexity: The Case of Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Yang Zheng & Linlin Cheng & Yifang Wang, 2022. "Measuring the Spatial Conflict of Resource-Based Cities and Its Coupling Coordination Relationship with Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Bao Meng & Shaoyao Zhang & Wei Deng & Li Peng & Peng Zhou & Hao Zhang, 2023. "Identification and Analysis of Territorial Spatial Utilization Conflicts in Yibin Based on Multidimensional Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Qian Zuo & Yong Zhou & Jingyi Liu, 2022. "Construction and Optimization Strategy of an Ecological Network in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study in Southwestern Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Jingying Fu & Yi Zhao, 2022. "A Review on the Overall Optimization of Production–Living–Ecological Space: Theoretical Basis and Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Yanru Zhao & Xiaomin Zhao & Xinyi Huang & Jiaxin Guo & Guohui Chen, 2022. "Identifying a Period of Spatial Land Use Conflicts and Their Driving Forces in the Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Niu, Hebin & Wang, Jinman & Jing, Zhaorui & Liu, Biao, 2023. "Identification and management of land use conflicts in mining cities: A case study of Shuozhou in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Aleksandra Król-Badziak & Jerzy Kozyra & Stelios Rozakis, 2024. "Evaluation of Climate Suitability for Maize Production in Poland under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Tian Liang & Peng Du & Fei Yang & Yuanxia Su & Yinchen Luo & You Wu & Chuanhao Wen, 2022. "Potential Land-Use Conflicts in the Urban Center of Chongqing Based on the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Shukui Tan & Shangjun Zou & Yi Zhao & Qingsong He & Maomao Zhang, 2024. "Research on the Manifestation and Formation Mechanism of New Characteristics of Land Disputes: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Jiaqi Zhang & Hui Yong & Ning Lv, 2024. "Balancing Productivity and Sustainability: Insights into Cultivated Land Use Efficiency in Arid Region of Northwest China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13828-13856, September.
    16. Guanglong Dong & Jue Wang & Wenxin Zhang & Zheng Liu & Kehua Wang & Weiya Cheng, 2023. "Land Use Conflict Identification Coupled with Ecological Protection Priority in Jinan City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Guoliang Xu & Xiaonan Yin & Guangdong Wu & Ning Gao, 2022. "Rethinking the Contribution of Land Element to Urban Economic Growth: Evidence from 30 Provinces in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Irena Ištoka Otković & Barbara Karleuša & Aleksandra Deluka-Tibljaš & Sanja Šurdonja & Mario Marušić, 2021. "Combining Traffic Microsimulation Modeling and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Sustainable Spatial-Traffic Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Xufeng Cui & Tingting Zhou & Xinxing Xiong & Jiaqi Xiong & Jing Zhang & Yuehua Jiang, 2022. "Farmland Suitability Evaluation Oriented by Non-Agriculturalization Sensitivity: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Yan Sun & Xiaoping Ge & Junna Liu & Yuanyuan Chang & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Mitigating Spatial Conflict of Land Use for Sustainable Wetlands Landscape in Li-Xia-River Region of Central Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2013-:d:1529618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.