IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1921-d1521642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Revolution: Emerging Technologies for Enhancing Citizen Engagement in Urban and Environmental Management

Author

Listed:
  • Fanny E. Berigüete

    (Department of Physics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya UPC, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

  • José S. Santos

    (University Research Institute for Sustainability Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya UPC, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Inma Rodriguez Cantalapiedra

    (Department of Physics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya UPC, 08028 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Citizen participation is key in urban planning, but traditional methods are often limited in terms of accessibility and inclusion. This study investigates how the use of emerging technologies such as Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR), Digital Twin (DT), Building Information Modelling (BIM), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can enhance citizen participation in urban planning. Through the review and analysis of existing literature, combined with the study of cases from cities in Eurasia and North America on the implementation of these technologies in urban and environmental planning, the results indicate that the use of multi-reality technologies facilitates immersive visualization of urban projects, allowing citizens to better understand the implications of proposed changes. Furthermore, the integration of real-time monitoring, such as forest and climate surveillance, improves environmental control. Technologies like AI and GIS also enable greater precision and empowerment in participatory decision-making. Nevertheless, the emergence of these technologies presents a challenge that must be addressed, as it is essential to establish a regulatory framework to ensure their responsible use. In conclusion, these platforms not only increase participation and co-creation but also enable more efficient, sustainable, and inclusive urban planning. Greater adoption of these technologies is suggested to optimize the urban decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanny E. Berigüete & José S. Santos & Inma Rodriguez Cantalapiedra, 2024. "Digital Revolution: Emerging Technologies for Enhancing Citizen Engagement in Urban and Environmental Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-42, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1921-:d:1521642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashid Mehmood & Tan Yigitcanlar & Juan M. Corchado, 2024. "Smart Technologies for Sustainable Urban and Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-8, January.
    2. Louis Meuleman, 2021. "Public Administration and Governance for the SDGs: Navigating between Change and Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Zaheer Allam & Ayyoob Sharifi & Simon Elias Bibri & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Smart Urban Governance," Post-Print hal-03997425, HAL.
    4. Constance Carr & Markus Hesse, 2022. "Technocratic Urban Development: Large Digital Corporations as Power Brokers of the Digital Age," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 476-485, May.
    5. Daniel G. Costa & João Carlos N. Bittencourt & Franklin Oliveira & João Paulo Just Peixoto & Thiago C. Jesus, 2024. "Achieving Sustainable Smart Cities through Geospatial Data-Driven Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, January.
    6. Mike Hodson & Simon Marvin, 2010. "Urbanism in the anthropocene: Ecological urbanism or premium ecological enclaves?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 298-313, June.
    7. Heba Akasha & Omid Ghaffarpasand & Francis D. Pope, 2023. "Climate Change, Air Pollution and the Associated Burden of Disease in the Arabian Peninsula and Neighbouring Regions: A Critical Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Odeh Al-Jayyousi & Hira Amin & Hiba Ali Al-Saudi & Amjaad Aljassas & Evren Tok, 2023. "Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Björn Mestdagh & Olivier Sempiga & Luc Van Liedekerke, 2023. "The Impact of External Shocks on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Linking the COVID-19 Pandemic to SDG Implementation at the Local Government Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Laurence Troy, 2018. "The politics of urban renewal in Sydney’s residential apartment market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1329-1345, May.
    4. Eggimann, Sven, 2022. "Expanding urban green space with superblocks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Anders Blok & Robin Tschötschel, 2016. "World port cities as cosmopolitan risk community: Mapping urban climate policy experiments in Europe and East Asia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(4), pages 717-736, June.
    6. Marit Rosol & Vincent Béal & Samuel Mössner, 2017. "Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1710-1718, August.
    7. Jiang Xu, 2016. "Environmental discourses in China’s urban planning system: A scaled discourse-analytical perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(5), pages 978-999, April.
    8. Franciszek Chwałczyk, 2020. "Around the Anthropocene in Eighty Names—Considering the Urbanocene Proposition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-33, May.
    9. Simone Linke & Sabrina Erlwein & Martina van Lierop & Elizaveta Fakirova & Stephan Pauleit & Werner Lang, 2022. "Climate Change Adaption between Governance and Government—Collaborative Arrangements in the City of Munich," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Ayṣem Mert & Elise Remling, 2023. "Changes in the practices and narratives of the United Nations High-Level Political Forum during the COVID-19 pandemic," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 123-132, June.
    11. Mark Roseland & Maria Spiliotopoulou, 2016. "Converging Urban Agendas: Toward Healthy and Sustainable Communities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Sofie Bouteligier, 2011. "Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth system governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 43-61, March.
    13. Syed Amir Manzoor & Aisha Malik & Muhammad Zubair & Geoffrey Griffiths & Martin Lukac, 2019. "Linking Social Perception and Provision of Ecosystem Services in a Sprawling Urban Landscape: A Case Study of Multan, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Daniele Ronsivalle, 2023. "Relevance and Role of Contemporary Architecture Preservation—Assessing and Evaluating Architectural Heritage as a Contemporary Landscape: A Study Case in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Ali Cheshmehzangi & Andrew Flynn & May Tan-Mullins & Linjun Xie & Wu Deng & Eugenio Mangi & Weixuan Chen, 2021. "From Eco-Urbanism to Eco-Fusion: An Augmented Multi-Scalar Framework in Sustainable Urbanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Mundy, Karen, 2023. "SDG4 and state capacity: The missing link," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    17. Federico Caprotti & Joanna Romanowicz, 2013. "Thermal Eco-cities: Green Building and Urban Thermal Metabolism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1949-1967, November.
    18. Cameron Allen & Shirin Malekpour & Michael Mintrom, 2023. "Cross‐scale, cross‐level and multi‐actor governance of transformations toward the Sustainable Development Goals: A review of common challenges and solutions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1250-1267, June.
    19. Maria Popescu & Lidia Mandru, 2022. "A Model for a Process Approach in the Governance System for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Maria Spiliotopoulou & Mark Roseland, 2020. "Urban Sustainability: From Theory Influences to Practical Agendas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1921-:d:1521642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.