IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1905-d1520229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Driving Factors of Cultivated Land Fragmentation Under the Expansion of Urban and Rural Construction Land: A Case Study of Ezhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Feng

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Haoran Gao

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, George-Augustus-University of Göttingen, 37077 Gottingen, Germany)

  • Liping Qu

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Land and Resources Law Evaluation Project, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Jian Gong

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Key Laboratory of Land and Resources Law Evaluation Project, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

A systematic understanding of the spatial-temporal evolution patterns of cultivated land fragmentation (CLF), its driving factors, and its relationship with the expansion of urban and rural construction land is essential for identifying strategies to mitigate CLF in rapidly urbanizing regions. This study combined landscape fragmentation with ownership fragmentation, analyzing CLF through three dimensions: resource endowment, spatial concentration, and convenience of utilization, with eight selected indicators. By comparing village-level data from 2013 to 2022, we explored the key drivers of CLF and its conflicts with urban and rural construction land expansion. The findings indicate a clear spatial variation in village-level CLF in Ezhou, characterized by low fragmentation in the northwest and northeast, and high fragmentation in the southwest and central regions. This pattern is in contrast to Ezhou’s economic development, which decreased progressively from east to north and south. Over the study period, village-level CLF in Ezhou evolved from being primarily moderately and relatively severely fragmented to predominantly severely and relatively severely fragmented, with an overall declining trend and more pronounced polarization. At the same time, the CLF within the village region demonstrated notable spatial clustering features, with a rapid increase observed between 2013 and 2022. It was also discovered that CLF is driven by various factors, with the main influences being the proportion of construction land, land use intensity, and population density. Cultivated land is the main source of both urban construction land (UCL) and rural construction land (RCL), with average contribution rates of 46.47% and 62.62%, respectively. This research offers empirical evidence for rapid urbanization and serves as a critical reference for rural revitalization and coordinated urban–rural development, with potential guidance for future policy formulation and implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Feng & Haoran Gao & Liping Qu & Jian Gong, 2024. "Analysis of the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Driving Factors of Cultivated Land Fragmentation Under the Expansion of Urban and Rural Construction Land: A Case Study of Ezhou City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1905-:d:1520229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shanshan Xiang & Liping Shan & Wuzhou Li & Lingyan Huang, 2023. "A Comparative Analysis of the Interaction between Urban-Rural Construction Land Transition and Population Flow: Dominant and Recessive Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Chaozheng Zhang & Danling Chen, 2021. "Fragmentation Reduction through Farmer-Led Land Transfer and Consolidation? Experiences of Rice Farmers in Wuhan Metropolitan Area, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Bahadir Alturk & Fatih Konukcu, 2020. "Modeling land use/land cover change and mapping morphological fragmentation of agricultural lands in Thrace Region/Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6379-6404, October.
    4. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    5. Yingjie Hu & Xiangbin Kong & Ji Zheng & Jin Sun & Linlin Wang & Mingzhe Min, 2018. "Urban Expansion and Farmland Loss in Beijing during 1980–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Xing Niu & Fenghua Liao & Ziming Liu & Guancen Wu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Land–Use Transition from the Perspective of Urban–Rural Transformation Development: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Jin, Xuanyi & Jiang, Wenrui & Fang, Delin & Wang, Saige & Chen, Bin, 2024. "Evaluation and driving force analysis of the water-energy‑carbon nexus in agricultural trade for RCEP countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    8. Looga, J. & Jürgenson, E. & Sikk, K. & Matveev, E. & Maasikamäe, S., 2018. "Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity: The case of Estonia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 285-292.
    9. Qu, Yanbo & Jiang, Guang-hui & Li, Zitong & Tian, Yaya & Wei, Shuwen, 2019. "Understanding rural land use transition and regional consolidation implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 742-753.
    10. CAO, Yu & Zou, Jie & Fang, Xiaoqian & Wang, Jiayi & Cao, Yu & Li, Guoyu, 2020. "Effect of land tenure fragmentation on the decision-making and scale of agricultural land transfer in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Xian & Chen, Haibin & Niu, Wenhao & Kong, Xiangbin & Yu, Qiang & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Identifying opportunities to close yield gaps in China by use of certificated cultivars to estimate potential productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Bin Yang & Zhanqi Wang & Bo Zhang & Di Zhang, 2020. "Allocation Efficiency, Influencing Factors and Optimization Path of Rural Land Resources: A Case Study in Fang County of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Liu, Jing & Jin, Xiaobin & Xu, Weiyi & Sun, Rui & Han, Bo & Yang, Xuhong & Gu, Zhengming & Xu, Cuilan & Sui, Xueyan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2019. "Influential factors and classification of cultivated land fragmentation, and implications for future land consolidation: A case study of Jiangsu Province in eastern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Fei, Rilong & Lin, Ziyi & Chunga, Joseph, 2021. "How land transfer affects agricultural land use efficiency: Evidence from China’s agricultural sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Zhiheng Yang & Nengneng Shen & Yanbo Qu & Bailin Zhang, 2021. "Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Zhou, Yang & Zhong, Zhen & Cheng, Guoqiang, 2023. "Cultivated land loss and construction land expansion in China: Evidence from national land surveys in 1996, 2009 and 2019," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Wu, Xiaoran & Zhao, Na & Wang, Yuwei & Zhang, Liqiang & Wang, Wei & Liu, Yansui, 2024. "Cropland non-agriculturalization caused by the expansion of built-up areas in China during 1990–2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Jinlong Gao & Zhixuan Wu & Jianglong Chen & Wen Chen, 2020. "Beyond the bid‐rent: Two tales of land use transition in contemporary China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1336-1356, September.
    9. Peizhen Wang & Ligang Lyu & Jiangang Xu, 2021. "Factors Influencing Rural Households’ Decision-Making Behavior on Residential Relocation: Willingness and Destination," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Wen, Yangyang & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Liang, Di & Xu, Ze, 2020. "Rural Residential Land Transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region: Spatial-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Li, Jing & Lo, Kevin & Zhang, Pingyu & Guo, Meng, 2021. "Reclaiming small to fill large: A novel approach to rural residential land consolidation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Jing Wang & Yurui Li & Qianyi Wang & Kee Cheok Cheong, 2019. "Urban–Rural Construction Land Replacement for More Sustainable Land Use and Regional Development in China: Policies and Practices," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Liao, Liuwen & Long, Hualou & Gao, Xiaolu & Ma, Enpu, 2019. "Effects of land use transitions and rural aging on agricultural production in China’s farming area: A perspective from changing labor employing quantity in the planting industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Su, Kangchuan & Hu, Baoqing & Shi, Kaifang & Zhang, Zhongxun & Yang, Qingyuan, 2019. "The structural and functional evolution of rural homesteads in mountainous areas: A case study of Sujiaying village in Yunnan province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Cultivated land protection and rational use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Xu, Weiyi & Jin, Xiaobin & Liu, Jing & Zhou, Yinkang, 2021. "Analysis of influencing factors of cultivated land fragmentation based on hierarchical linear model: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Guo, Beibei & Fang, Yelin & Jin, Xiaobin & zhou, Yinkang, 2020. "Monitoring the effects of land consolidation on the ecological environmental quality based on remote sensing: A case study of Chaohu Lake Basin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    18. Lin, Yongyuan & Shui, Wei & Li, Zhipan & Huang, Shan & Wu, Kexin & Sun, Xiaorui & Liang, Jingchen, 2021. "Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Xianhui Hu & Xiaxia Lin & Gaohui Wen & Yi Zhou & Hao Zhou & Siqi Lin & Dongyang Yue, 2024. "The Impact of Cultivated Land Fragmentation on Farmers’ Ecological Efficiency of Cultivated Land Use Based on the Moderating and Mediating Effects of the Cultivated Land Management Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Liu, Shuchang & Xiao, Wu & Ye, Yanmei & He, Tingting & Luo, Heng, 2023. "Rural residential land expansion and its impacts on cultivated land in China between 1990 and 2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1905-:d:1520229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.