IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v146y2024ics0264837724002655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cropland non-agriculturalization caused by the expansion of built-up areas in China during 1990–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Xiaoran
  • Zhao, Na
  • Wang, Yuwei
  • Zhang, Liqiang
  • Wang, Wei
  • Liu, Yansui

Abstract

The unprecedented built-up area expansion in China has resulted in a significant occupation of cropland. Yet, to date, we have not achieved continuous monitoring of the occupation of cropland by different types of built-up land, nor have their annual impacts on non-agriculturalization been revealed. Here, for the first time, we have generated a dataset spanning from 1990 to 2020, consisting of annual areas for urban land (UL), rural residential land (RRL), and other built-up land (OBL) and their occupation of cropland at the county level across China. Subsequently, the annual contributions of these three types of built-up land expansion to non-agriculturalization in China were unveiled. Our results show that the average annual conversion of cropland into UL, RRL, and OBL was 1520.60 km², 1464.60 km², and 987.44 km², respectively, during the study period. Among these, only the conversion of cropland into OBL exhibited a significant increasing trend of 4.64 km²/a. Overall, different types of built-up land have distinct spatial impacts on the non-agriculturalization of cropland at the county level, which undergo significant changes over time. The non-agriculturalization of cropland in China is significantly influenced by the expansion of built-up areas, particularly in counties in the eastern regions. The northern regions are most affected by UL expansion and RRL expansion, followed by the southern regions. OBL expansion has significantly impacted the non-agriculturalization of counties in the southern regions, with its influence gradually extending from eastern to western China during the study period. Before 2015, the expansion of UL had a higher impact on non-agriculturalization compared to RRL and OBL. However, from 2015 to 2020, in 62.52 % of counties, the expansion of RRL contributed more to non-agriculturalization than the expansion of RRL and OBL. It is suggested that China should pay more attention to protecting cropland from being occupied by RRL expansion. This study provides insights that can inform sustainable land use planning and facilitate the development of targeted cropland protection policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Xiaoran & Zhao, Na & Wang, Yuwei & Zhang, Liqiang & Wang, Wei & Liu, Yansui, 2024. "Cropland non-agriculturalization caused by the expansion of built-up areas in China during 1990–2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:146:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724002655
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724002655
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:146:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724002655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.