IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i8p1585-d1215326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Rural Spatial Form and Carbon Emission—A Case Study of Suburban Integrated Villages in Hunan Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Limei Song

    (School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Feng Xu

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
    Hunan Key Laboratory of Sciences of Urban and Rural Human Settlements in Hilly Areas, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Ming Sheng

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Baohua Wen

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

Abstract

With the implementation of China’s rural revitalization strategy, the societies and economies of villages have been comprehensively developed, but the carbon emissions in rural areas have also been increasing year by year. Therefore, low-carbon control of the rural spatial form has become an important element of rural revitalization. This paper takes 18 suburban integrated villages in the plain terrain within Hunan Province, China, as the research object, quantifies the spatial morphology indicators of the overall rural community and the neighborhood building groups, and investigates the relationship between rural spatial form and carbon emissions in plain terrain, aiming to clarify the content of low-carbon control in rural spatial planning. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The correlation between spatial form and carbon emissions at different levels of suburban integrated villages is “total volume form > neighborhood building groups combination form > overall layout form > neighborhood connection form”. When the scale of the villages is fixed, the spatial layout of the neighborhood building groups has a more direct influence on the carbon emissions of the residents. (2) The building density in the overall spatial form of the village has the greatest influence on the carbon emissions of the suburban integrated villages, and it is positively correlated. (3) There is a negative correlation between the form of neighborhood building groups and carbon emissions within a certain range. When the distance between the front and back of a building is 8–12 m, the carbon emissions of the building decrease with the increase in the degree of aggregation on the building, but when the distance between the front and back of a building reaches 12 m or more, the influence of the group layout form on the carbon emissions of the building is weakened. (4) Finally, based on the principle of “macro-control quantity and meso-control shape”, this paper proposes new control content and indicators for Hunan’s rural territorial space planning, which can provide a reference for low-carbon control in rural space form planning with suburban integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Limei Song & Feng Xu & Ming Sheng & Baohua Wen, 2023. "The Relationship between Rural Spatial Form and Carbon Emission—A Case Study of Suburban Integrated Villages in Hunan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1585-:d:1215326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1585/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/8/1585/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoqing Zhu & Tiancheng Zhang & Weijun Gao & Danying Mei, 2020. "Analysis on Spatial Pattern and Driving Factors of Carbon Emission in Urban–Rural Fringe Mixed-Use Communities: Cases Study in East Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Zishuo Huang & Yingfang Liu & Jing Gao & Zhenwei Peng, 2022. "Approach for Village Carbon Emissions Index and Planning Strategies Generation Based on Two-Stage Optimization Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Liang, Xinyuan & Jin, Xiaobin & He, Jie & Wang, Xiaorui & Xu, Cuilan & Qiao, Guoliang & Zhang, Xiaolin & Zhou, Yinkang, 2022. "Impacts of land management practice strategy on regional ecosystems: Enlightenment from ecological redline adjustment in Jiangsu, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Fang, Chuanglin & Wang, Shaojian & Li, Guangdong, 2015. "Changing urban forms and carbon dioxide emissions in China: A case study of 30 provincial capital cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 519-531.
    5. Kai Zhu & Manya Tu & Yingcheng Li, 2022. "Did Polycentric and Compact Structure Reduce Carbon Emissions? A Spatial Panel Data Analysis of 286 Chinese Cities from 2002 to 2019," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Chengzhi Yin & Jianhua Xiao & Tianqi Zhang, 2021. "Effectiveness of Chinese Regulatory Planning in Mitigating and Adapting to Climate Change: Comparative Analysis Based on Q Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Su & Bo Zhou & Yuanpei Liao & Chaoshen Wang & Tian Feng, 2022. "Impact Mechanism of the Urban Network on Carbon Emissions in Rapidly Developing Regions: Example of 47 Cities in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Bingxin Li & Qiang Zheng & Xue Jiang & Chennan He, 2024. "Multi-Scale Spatial Structure Impacts on Carbon Emission in Cold Region: Case Study in Changchun, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-33, December.
    3. Ke Luo & Shuo Chen & Shixi Cui & Yuantao Liao & Yu He & Chunshan Zhou & Shaojian Wang, 2023. "Examining the Overall and Heterogeneous Impacts of Urban Spatial Structure on Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Liya Yang & Honghui Zhang & Xinqi Liao & Haiqi Wang & Yong Bian & Geng Liu & Weiling Luo, 2023. "The Relationship between Spatial Characteristics of Urban-Rural Settlements and Carbon Emissions in Guangdong Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Yahui Guang & Yongbin Huang, 2022. "Urban Form and Household Energy Consumption: Evidence from China Panel Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    7. Sun, Lu & Liu, Wenjing & Li, Zhaoling & Cai, Bofeng & Fujii, Minoru & Luo, Xiao & Chen, Wei & Geng, Yong & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Le, Yiping, 2021. "Spatial and structural characteristics of CO2 emissions in East Asian megacities and its indication for low-carbon city development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    8. Zhonghua Cheng & Xiaowen Hu, 2023. "The effects of urbanization and urban sprawl on CO2 emissions in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1792-1808, February.
    9. Liu, Xingjian & Wang, Mingshu & Qiang, Wei & Wu, Kang & Wang, Xiaomi, 2020. "Urban form, shrinking cities, and residential carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese city-regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Sun, Xiaohang & Duan, Haiyan & Song, Junnian & Zheng, Heran & Yang, Wei & Mi, Zhifu, 2024. "Carbon peaking trajectory links to development of a coupled urbanization-industrialization-energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    11. Xiaoxu, Xing & Qiangmin, Xi & Weihao, Shi, 2024. "Impact of urban compactness on carbon emission in Chinese cities: From moderating effects of industrial diversity and job-housing imbalances," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    12. Paul Drummond, 2021. "Assessing City Governance for Low-Carbon Mobility in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Yuhua Li & Shihang Wang, 2024. "Exploration of Eco-Environment and Urbanization Changes Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data—A Case Study of Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Eryu Zhang & Xiaoyu He & Peng Xiao, 2022. "Does Smart City Construction Decrease Urban Carbon Emission Intensity? Evidence from a Difference-in-Difference Estimation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Xiyue Hao & Chuyue Yan & Daisuke Narumi, 2024. "Assessing CO 2 Reduction Effects Through Decarbonization Scenarios in the Residential and Transportation Sectors: Challenges and Solutions for Japan’s Hilly and Mountainous Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-25, November.
    16. Gang Xu & Tianyi Zeng & Hong Jin & Cong Xu & Ziqi Zhang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Variations and Influencing Factors of Country-Level Carbon Emissions for Northeast China Based on VIIRS Nighttime Lighting Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Li, Jia Shuo & Zhou, H.W. & Meng, Jing & Yang, Q. & Chen, B. & Zhang, Y.Y., 2018. "Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: A case analysis for Beijing city," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 1076-1086.
    18. Sun, Xudong & Li, Jiashuo & Qiao, Han & Zhang, Bo, 2017. "Energy implications of China's regional development: New insights from multi-regional input-output analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 118-131.
    19. Yongxing Li & Wei Guo & Peixian Li & Xuesheng Zhao & Jinke Liu, 2023. "Exploring the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of CO 2 Emissions through a Combination of Nighttime Light and MODIS NDVI Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Pingping Xiong & Xiaojie Wu & Jing Ye, 2023. "Building a novel multivariate nonlinear MGM(1,m,N|γ) model to forecast carbon emissions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9647-9671, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:8:p:1585-:d:1215326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.