IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p1086-d1150117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Perception of the Ecosystem Services of Prunus serotina subsp. capuli in the Andes of Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Carlos Carrasco Baquero

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Riobamba 060155, Ecuador)

  • Luis Felipe Lema Palaquibay

    (CAPULI—Investigation Project, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Ecuador & Investigation Institute, Riobamba 060155, Ecuador)

  • Carlos Renato Chávez Velásquez

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Riobamba 060155, Ecuador)

  • Verónica Caballero-Serrano

    (Faculty of Natural Resources, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Riobamba 060155, Ecuador)

  • Rachel Itle

    (Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30229, USA)

  • Dario J. Chavez

    (Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30229, USA
    Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30229, USA)

Abstract

Ecosystem services (ES) refer to the benefits that people obtain from the ecosystem. In this sense, Prunus serotina is associated with the provision of ES; however, these services have been scarcely studied. The objective of this research was to determine the knowledge and perceptions of individuals in rural areas regarding the importance of ES, as well as the factors that influence them. Surveys were applied in three study areas (Chimborazo, Tungurahua, and Cotopaxi) of the central Andes of Ecuador that detailed the sociodemographic and perception characteristics of ES based on the predefined ES of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). In the assessment, the interview data were analyzed to obtain the relationships between the variables using Spearman’s correlation in the R-studio software. The results showed that individuals’ level of education, age, and gender play an important role in variations in peoples’ knowledge of ES. A total of 21 ES were identified; the most representative services, according to their ecosystem category, were support (shelter for birds and insects and soil formation), provisioning (food, insecticide, wood, and firewood), regulation (improvement in the quality of air and climate regulation), and culture (scenic beauty and the maintenance of traditions). This analysis of the social perception of ES works as a strategy for the maintenance of Prunus serotina in the orchards and plots of families in the central Andes of Ecuador. The identification of ES through the social perception of their existence facilitates an understanding of the importance of ES in rural localities, which lays the foundation for strategies to be developed in the future for their conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Carlos Carrasco Baquero & Luis Felipe Lema Palaquibay & Carlos Renato Chávez Velásquez & Verónica Caballero-Serrano & Rachel Itle & Dario J. Chavez, 2023. "Social Perception of the Ecosystem Services of Prunus serotina subsp. capuli in the Andes of Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1086-:d:1150117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marina García-Llorente & Antonio J. Castro & Cristina Quintas-Soriano & Elisa Oteros-Rozas & Irene Iniesta-Arandia & José A. González & David García del Amo & Marta Hernández-Arroyo & Izaskun Casado-A, 2020. "Local Perceptions of Ecosystem Services Across Multiple Ecosystem Types in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Rüdisser, Johannes & Schirpke, Uta & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2019. "Symbolic entities in the European Alps: Perception and use of a cultural ecosystem service," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dehghani Pour, Milad & Barati, Ali Akbar & Azadi, Hossein & Scheffran, Jürgen & Shirkhani, Mehdi, 2023. "Analyzing forest residents' perception and knowledge of forest ecosystem services to guide forest management and biodiversity conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Carine Pachoud & Riccardo Da Re & Maurizio Ramanzin & Stefano Bovolenta & Damiano Gianelle & Enrico Sturaro, 2020. "Tourists and Local Stakeholders’ Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by Summer Farms in the Eastern Italian Alps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    3. John E. Quinn & Karen E. Allen, 2021. "Governance, Values, and Conservation Processes in Multifunctional Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-6, May.
    4. Kronenberg, Jakub & Bocian, Monika, 2022. "Animal and plant images in corporate marketing communications are ecosystem services that should be paid for," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Lavorel, Sandra & Rey, Pierre-Louis & Grigulis, Karl & Zawada, Mégane & Byczek, Coline, 2020. "Interactions between outdoor recreation and iconic terrestrial vertebrates in two French alpine national parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    6. Uta Schirpke & Manuel Ebner & Hanna Pritsch & Veronika Fontana & Rainer Kurmayer, 2021. "Quantifying Ecosystem Services of High Mountain Lakes across Different Socio-Ecological Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Ebner, Manuel & Fontana, Veronika & Schirpke, Uta & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2022. "Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem services of mountain lakes in the European Alps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    8. Xia, Zheyi & Yuan, Chengcheng & Gao, Yang & Shen, Zhen & Liu, Kui & Huang, Yuwen & Wei, Xue & Liu, Liming, 2023. "Integrating perceptions of ecosystem services in adaptive management of country parks: A case study in peri-urban Shanghai, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1086-:d:1150117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.