IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p386-d1052765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living on the Edge—Mismatches and Expectations in a Changing Landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Morgado

    (Centro de Investigação em Arquitetura, Urbanismo e Design, Faculdade de Arquitetura, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-063 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper deals with the confrontation between the forms of urbanisation of Lisbon, Portugal, that extends its fringes over the Alcântara Valley. This same Valley—topography and hydrography—plays as determinants of the occupation that will assume distinct narratives. This gradual process is explained through three narratives about (1) the urbanisation of the margin driven by industrialisation and the construction of a stigmatised periphery, (2) the imposition of large capacity infrastructures far beyond what is local, (3) the system of open spaces and landscape projects and the urban brink that the valley claims. The debate focuses on the answers that the urban and landscape project, necessarily going through urban planning and its practical and theoretical scopes, i.e., Urbanism and urban planning thinking, especially in a broad present seeking to discuss both sides of the coin: on the one hand, an urban rehabilitation with public space for all, on the other hand, a qualified and central space that attracts real estate investment that may bring effects contrary to those expected. The article seeks to contribute (1) to a broader perception of the superimposition of processes that transformed the Alcântara Valley, (2) to a fuller dissemination of the urbanistic experiences in the city of Lisbon since this city is still vastly underrepresented in the international (primarily Anglo-Saxon) literature, (3) to deepen the debate between urban rehabilitation, urban regeneration, consequences and opportunities practiced is still trying to cope with.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Morgado, 2023. "Living on the Edge—Mismatches and Expectations in a Changing Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:386-:d:1052765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ib Bondebjerg, 2014. "Documentary and Cognitive Theory: Narrative, Emotion and Memory," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(1), pages 13-22.
    2. João Seixas & António Brito Guterres, 2019. "Political evolution in the Lisbon of the digital era. Fast urban changes, slow institutional restructuring and growing civic pressures," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 99-110, January.
    3. Matthew Carmona, 2015. "Re-theorising contemporary public space: a new narrative and a new normative," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 373-405, December.
    4. Aleksander Bern, 2023. "Myths and imaginaries in architectural competitions," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 114-135, January.
    5. Falanga, Roberto & Nunes, Mafalda Corrêa, 2021. "Tackling urban disparities through participatory culture-led urban regeneration. Insights from Lisbon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Boffi & Nicola Rainisio & Paolo Inghilleri, 2023. "Nurturing Cultural Heritages and Place Attachment through Street Art—A Longitudinal Psycho-Social Analysis of a Neighborhood Renewal Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Yichen Zhu & Zhenyu Li, 2024. "‘Sharing’ as a Critical Framework for Waterfront Heritage Regeneration: A Case Study of Suzhou Creek, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Yingyi Han, 2023. "Evolution of mediated memory in the digital age: tracing its path from the 1950s to 2010s," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Isabelle Soares & Gerd Weitkamp & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Public Spaces as Knowledgescapes: Understanding the Relationship between the Built Environment and Creative Encounters at Dutch University Campuses and Science Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-30, October.
    5. Abdulaziz Alzahrani, 2022. "Classification of Urban Spaces: An Attempt to Classify Al-Baha City Urban Spaces Using Carmona’s Classification," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    6. Eduardo Medeiros & Ana Brandão & Paulo Tormenta Pinto & Sara Silva Lopes, 2021. "Urban Planning Policies to the Renewal of Riverfront Areas: The Lisbon Metropolis Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Reza Askarizad & Jinliao He, 2022. "Perception of Spatial Legibility and Its Association with Human Mobility Patterns: An Empirical Assessment of the Historical Districts in Rasht, Iran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Mark Del Aguila & Ensiyeh Ghavampour & Brenda Vale, 2019. "Theory of Place in Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 249-259.
    9. Isabelle Soares & Claudia Yamu & Gerd Weitkamp, 2020. "The Relationship between the Spatial Configuration and the Fourth Sustainable Dimension Creativity in University Campuses: The Case Study of Zernike Campus, Groningen, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82, Center for Open Science.
    11. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2018. "Modern Compact Cities: How Much Greenery Do We Need?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Shuran Li & Chengwei Wang & Liying Rong & Shiqi Zhou & Zhiqiang Wu, 2024. "Understanding How People Perceive and Interact with Public Space through Social Media Big Data: A Case Study of Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Loboda Lichtenbaum, Shira & Rosen, Gillad, 2018. "Municipal management of residential collectively owned open space: Exploring the case of Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 762-771.
    14. Paudel, Uttam & Pant, Krishna Prasad, 2023. "Understanding vitality of public space: A review with an example of capital city Kathmandu in Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    15. Ib Bondebjerg, 2017. "The creative mind: cognition, society and culture," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:386-:d:1052765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.