IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i12p2159-d1299067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Form of a Smart City District: A Morphometric Comparison with Examples of Previous Design Models

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Venerandi

    (Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, AMU, AU, ESPACE, 06200 Nice, France
    Urban Design Studies Unit (UDSU), Department of Architecture, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK)

  • Giovanni Fusco

    (Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, AMU, AU, ESPACE, 06200 Nice, France)

  • Matteo Caglioni

    (Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, AMU, AU, ESPACE, 06200 Nice, France)

Abstract

In key moments of urban history, urban design is confronted with the emergence of new paradigmatic design models, such as the garden city and the radiant city. Recently, the Smart City seems to have gained centre stage in the public debate. However, despite its emblazoned technological features, the Smart City remains a hazy concept in the urban design domain to such an extent that almost any form can be built under the Smart City label. While this may sound libertarian and progressist, it is also concerning since different urban forms are associated with different societal outcomes. This paper aims to investigate the forms of Smart City districts through morphometric comparison. More specifically, it proposes a replicable methodology based on 18 metrics of urban form and statistical analysis to compare a Smart City district with other city areas with known design models of reference. Such a methodology is applied to three case studies on the French Riviera: Méridia, a Smart City district, Hôtel-des-Postes, a 19th-century traditional district, and Sophia Antipolis, a sprawling technopark. The results show that Méridia has a hybrid form that partly resembles Hôtel-des-Postes (higher densities, gridiron plan, and functional mix) and partly Sophia Antipolis (bulky buildings with large setbacks). However, the top–down approach used in the production of the physical space ultimately renders Méridia more similar to Sophia Antipolis than Hôtel-des-Postes. This study provides one of the first morphometric characterisations of a Smart City district, but also a replicable methodology that can further the morphological understanding of the Smart City phenomenon worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Venerandi & Giovanni Fusco & Matteo Caglioni, 2023. "Exploring the Form of a Smart City District: A Morphometric Comparison with Examples of Previous Design Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:2159-:d:1299067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/12/2159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/12/2159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhigang Han & Caihui Cui & Changhong Miao & Haiying Wang & Xiang Chen, 2019. "Identifying Spatial Patterns of Retail Stores in Road Network Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Nikola Milojevic-Dupont & Nicolai Hans & Lynn H Kaack & Marius Zumwald & François Andrieux & Daniel de Barros Soares & Steffen Lohrey & Peter-Paul Pichler & Felix Creutzig, 2020. "Learning from urban form to predict building heights," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Federico Cugurullo, 2013. "How to Build a Sandcastle: An Analysis of the Genesis and Development of Masdar City," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 23-37, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marit Rosol & Vincent Béal & Samuel Mössner, 2017. "Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1710-1718, August.
    2. I-Chun Catherine Chang, 2017. "Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1719-1742, August.
    3. Koncz, Gábor & Kiss, Konrád & Nagyné Demeter, Dóra, 2020. "The Regional Structure Of Retail Sector In The Northern Hungary Region," Acta Carolus Robertus, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 2020(Special).
    4. Yigitcanlar, Tan & Lee, Sang Ho, 2014. "Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: A smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 100-114.
    5. Anna Hult, 2015. "The Circulation of Swedish Urban Sustainability Practices: To China and Back," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(3), pages 537-553, March.
    6. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2022. "Bibliometric review about eco-cites and urban sustainable development: trend topics," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13683-13704, December.
    7. Federico Caprotti & Cecilia Springer & Nichola Harmer, 2015. "‘Eco’ For Whom? Envisioning Eco-urbanism in the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 495-517, May.
    8. Bulu, Melih, 2014. "Upgrading a city via technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 63-67.
    9. Negar Noori & Thomas Hoppe & Martin de Jong, 2020. "Classifying Pathways for Smart City Development: Comparing Design, Governance and Implementation in Amsterdam, Barcelona, Dubai, and Abu Dhabi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Kitchin, Rob & Cardullo, Paolo & Di Feliciantonio, Cesare, 2018. "Citizenship, Justice and the Right to the Smart City," SocArXiv b8aq5, Center for Open Science.
    11. Xuanwei Chen & Mingwang Cheng & Xue Yang & Zhen Chu & Kaifeng Duan, 2023. "Smart Cities Are More Populous: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Carmen Antuña-Rozado & Justo García-Navarro & Pekka Huovila, 2019. "Challenges in Adapting Sustainable City Solutions from Finland to Different Contexts Worldwide: A Libyan Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Olga Kolotouchkina & Gildo Seisdedos, 2018. "Place branding strategies in the context of new smart cities: Songdo IBD, Masdar and Skolkovo," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 115-124, May.
    14. Valeria Saiu, 2017. "The Three Pitfalls of Sustainable City: A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating the Theory-Practice Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Changjie Zhan & Martin De Jong, 2017. "Financing Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City: What Lessons Can Be Drawn for Other Large-Scale Sustainable City-Projects?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Jooseok Oh & Minho Seo, 2021. "Measuring Citizens-Centric Smart City: Development and Validation of Ex-Post Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Yaobin Fang & Hua Yu & Yuqing Chen & Xiaohong Fu, 2024. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of the Retail Industry in Ningbo City in Eastern China Based on POI Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-69.
    19. Jenni Viitanen & Richard Kingston, 2014. "Smart Cities and Green Growth: Outsourcing Democratic and Environmental Resilience to the Global Technology Sector," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(4), pages 803-819, April.
    20. Premalatha, M. & Tauseef, S.M. & Abbasi, Tasneem & Abbasi, S.A., 2013. "The promise and the performance of the world's first two zero carbon eco-cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 660-669.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:2159-:d:1299067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.