IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i10p1957-d1265604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Inefficient Urban Land for Urban Regeneration Considering Land Use Differentiation

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Jin

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
    Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Human Settlements in Hilly Regions, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Chunyuan Huang

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Pei Wang

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Junyong Ma

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China)

  • Yiliang Wan

    (School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    Geography Key Laboratory of Spatial Big Data Mining and Application of Hunan Province, Changsha 410081, China)

Abstract

Accurately identifying inefficient urban land is essential for urban regeneration and mining underutilized assets. Previous studies have primarily focused on examining the overall efficiency of land use without adequately considering the heterogeneity of urban land use types and comprehensive characteristics of urban quality. As a result, the spatial accuracy and precision of research findings have been relatively low. To address this gap, we developed a comprehensive method to identify inefficient urban lands for residential, commercial, and industrial use. The method integrated multi-source geographic data to quantitatively characterize the efficiency of different land use types considering six key dimensions, including building attribute, urban service, transportation condition, environmental quality, business performance, and production efficiency, utilized principal component analysis to reduce the multicollinearity and the dimensionality of the data, and identified land clusters with similar features that were inefficiently used by means of hierarchical clustering. By applying the method to Changsha, China, we validated its effectiveness. The results demonstrate that the method can accurately identify inefficient residential, commercial, and industrial land, with kappa coefficients of 0.71, 0.77, and 0.68, respectively. The identification results reveal the spatial distribution patterns of different types of inefficient land. Inefficient residential land is concentrated towards the city center, particularly in central areas. Inefficient commercial land is relatively evenly distributed, mainly outside the core commercial regions. Inefficient industrial land clusters towards the periphery, forming several agglomeration areas centered around industrial parks. By precisely identifying inefficient urban land and focusing on the key influencing factors, the proposed method enables the site selection of urban regeneration, site redevelopment evaluation, and optimization of urban resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Jin & Chunyuan Huang & Pei Wang & Junyong Ma & Yiliang Wan, 2023. "Identification of Inefficient Urban Land for Urban Regeneration Considering Land Use Differentiation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1957-:d:1265604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1957/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1957/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tao Zhou & Yulin Zhou & Guiwen Liu, 2017. "Key Variables for Decision-Making on Urban Renewal in China: A Case Study of Chongqing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Guoqing Cui & Wenlong Zheng & Siliang Chen & Yue Dong & Tingyu Huang, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Pattern Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Inefficient Urban Land Use in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Martin Heidenreich, 2015. "The New Museum Folkwang in Essen. A Contribution to the Cultural and Economic Regeneration of the Ruhr Area?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 1529-1547, August.
    4. Richards, Daniel R. & Tunçer, Bige, 2018. "Using image recognition to automate assessment of cultural ecosystem services from social media photographs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 318-325.
    5. Maurice Roux, 2018. "A Comparative Study of Divisive and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 35(2), pages 345-366, July.
    6. Ginevra Balletto & Mara Ladu & Federico Camerin & Emilio Ghiani & Jacopo Torriti, 2022. "More Circular City in the Energy and Ecological Transition: A Methodological Approach to Sustainable Urban Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Fionn Murtagh & Pierre Legendre, 2014. "Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion?," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(3), pages 274-295, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Danilina & Anna Korobeinikova & Irina Teplova, 2024. "Decision-Making Approach for Land Use in Urban Industrial Area Redevelopment Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-33, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maurizio Vichi & Carlo Cavicchia & Patrick J. F. Groenen, 2022. "Hierarchical Means Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 553-577, November.
    2. Jiao Jieying & Hu Guanyu & Yan Jun, 2021. "A Bayesian marked spatial point processes model for basketball shot chart," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 77-90, June.
    3. Paulus, Michal & Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2015. "Worldwide clustering of the corruption perception," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 428(C), pages 351-358.
    4. Mariann Szabó & Fruzsina Bozsoki, 2022. "Redevelopment of Brownfields for Cultural Use from ERDF Fund—The Case of Hungary between 2014 and 2020," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Hyeri Choi & Min Jae Park, 2019. "Evaluating the Efficiency of Governmental Excellence for Social Progress: Focusing on Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 111-130, January.
    6. Maksym Polyakov & Morteza Chalak & Md. Sayed Iftekhar & Ram Pandit & Sorada Tapsuwan & Fan Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2018. "Authorship, Collaboration, Topics, and Research Gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 217-239, September.
    7. Grzegorz Maciejewski & Mirosława Malinowska & Barbara Kucharska & Michał Kucia & Beata Kolny, 2021. "Sustainable Development as a Factor Differentiating Consumer Behavior: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 934-948.
    8. Giger, Markus & Mutea, Emily & Kiteme, Boniface & Eckert, Sandra & Anseeuw, Ward & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2020. "Large agricultural investments in Kenya’s Nanyuki Area: Inventory and analysis of business models," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Walker, Nathan L. & Styles, David & Coughlan, Paul & Williams, A. Prysor, 2022. "Cross-sector sustainability benchmarking of major utilities in the United Kingdom," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Simeng Li & Zhimin Liu & Chao Ye, 2022. "Community Renewal under Multi-Stakeholder Co-Governance: A Case Study of Shanghai’s Inner City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Pierre H. H. Schneeberger & Morgan Gueuning & Sophie Welsche & Eveline Hürlimann & Julian Dommann & Cécile Häberli & Jürg E. Frey & Somphou Sayasone & Jennifer Keiser, 2022. "Different gut microbial communities correlate with efficacy of albendazole-ivermectin against soil-transmitted helminthiases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Kaiser, Nina N. & Ghermandi, Andrea & Feld, Christian K. & Hershkovitz, Yaron & Palt, Martin & Stoll, Stefan, 2021. "Societal benefits of river restoration – Implications from social media analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    13. Abang Zainoren Abang Abdurahman & Syerina Azlin Md Nasir & Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob & Serah Jaya & Suhaili Mokhtar, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Clustering of Sarawak Malaysia Total Protected Area Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Zhou, Yulin & Lan, Feng & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "An experience-based mining approach to supporting urban renewal mode decisions under a multi-stakeholder environment in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Mulu Abraha Woldegiorgis & Janet E. Hiller & Wubegzier Mekonnen & Jahar Bhowmik, 2018. "Disparities in maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(4), pages 525-535, May.
    16. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    17. Renato Amorim, 2015. "Feature Relevance in Ward’s Hierarchical Clustering Using the L p Norm," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(1), pages 46-62, April.
    18. Myriam Caratù & Valerio Brescia & Ilaria Pigliautile & Paolo Biancone, 2023. "Assessing Energy Communities’ Awareness on Social Media with a Content and Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    19. Anca Gabriela Ilie & Marinela Luminita Emanuela Zlatea & Cristina Negreanu & Dan Dumitriu & Alma Pentescu, 2023. "Reliance on Russian Federation Energy Imports and Renewable Energy in the European Union," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(64), pages 780-780, August.
    20. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Natalia Bartkowiak-Bakun & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2020. "Energy Consumption Versus Greenhouse Gas Emissions in EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 185-198.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1957-:d:1265604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.