IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p23-d1010459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability Analysis and Input Use Efficiency of Maize Cultivation in Selected Areas of Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Rumana Biswas

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Khulna Agricultural University, Khulna 9202, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Mosharraf Uddin Molla

    (AERS Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Faisal-E-Alam

    (Department of Management Studies, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur 5404, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Zonayet

    (Department of Soil Science, Khulna Agricultural University, Khulna 9202, Bangladesh)

  • Rui Alexandre Castanho

    (Faculty of Applied Sciences, WSB University, 41-300 Dabrowa Górnicza, Poland
    College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524 Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

Maize farmers in Bangladesh are unaware of the benefits of maize cultivation due to a lack of information and concept generation. The objectives of this study were to estimate the cost and return of maize cultivation; assess the input use efficiency of maize cultivation for marginal, small, and medium maize production to address the problems; and suggest policy recommendations. The study was conducted in six villages in the Chuadanga district in Bangladesh. Data were collected by using an interview schedule from the purposively selected 80 respondents during 1–30 June 2018. After analyzing the data, the total cost of production was Tk. 124,495, Tk. 134,335, and Tk. 140,579 for marginal, small, and medium maize production, respectively. Per hectare gross return was Tk. 213,997, Tk. 204,972, and Tk. 197,163, and per hectare gross margin was Tk. 120,478, Tk. 104,748, and Tk. 92,516. Net return was calculated by deducting the gross cost from the gross return, and these were Tk. 89,502, Tk. 70,637, and Tk. 56,584. The benefit–cost ratio was 1.72, 1.53, and 1.40 for marginal, small, and medium maize production, respectively. From Cobb–Douglas production function analysis, it was observed that the coefficients of land preparation cost, irrigation cost, urea, and MoP cost were significant at different levels of probability for marginal, small, and medium maize production, and the coefficients of human labor cost, seed and pesticide used was not significant while the coefficients of TSP was negative and significant. This study also identified some of the problems associated with maize production. The findings revealed that the high price of inputs was the most acute problem, followed by a lack of technical knowledge and shortage of human labor at the critical stage, and declining soil fertility was the last obstacle that stood in the way of maize production in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Rumana Biswas & Md. Mosharraf Uddin Molla & Md. Faisal-E-Alam & Md. Zonayet & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2022. "Profitability Analysis and Input Use Efficiency of Maize Cultivation in Selected Areas of Bangladesh," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:23-:d:1010459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/23/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/23/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahman, Sanzidur, 2003. "Profit efficiency among Bangladeshi rice farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5-6), pages 487-503.
    2. Sanzidur Rahman & Md. Rahman & Md. Rahman, 2012. "Joint determination of the choice of growing season and economic efficiency of maize in Bangladesh," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 138-150.
    3. Dhawan, K. C. & Bansal, P. K., 1977. "Rationality of the Use of various Factors of Production on Different Sizes of Farm in the Punjab," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 32(3), July.
    4. Abdul Quddus & Jaclyn D. Kropp, 2020. "Constraints to Agricultural Production and Marketing in the Lagging Regions of Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Rahman, Sanzidur & Rahman, Md. Sayedur, 2014. "Exploring the potential and performance of maize production in Bangladesh," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 3(2), pages 1-9, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanzidur Rahman & Mohammad Mizanul Haque Kazal & Ismat Ara Begum & Mohammad Jahangir Alam, 2016. "Competitiveness, Profitability, Input Demand and Output Supply of Maize Production in Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Rahman, Sanzidur & Kazal, Mohammad Mizanul Haque, 2015. "Whether crop diversification is energy efficient: An empirical analysis from Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 745-754.
    3. Rahman, Sanzidur & Anik, Asif Reza, 2020. "Productivity and efficiency impact of climate change and agroecology on Bangladesh agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Sanzidur Rahman & Basanta Kumar Barmon, 2019. "Greening Modern Rice Farming Using Vermicompost and Its Impact on Productivity and Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis from Bangladesh," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Wollni, Meike & Brümmer, Bernhard, 2012. "Productive efficiency of specialty and conventional coffee farmers in Costa Rica: Accounting for technological heterogeneity and self-selection," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 67-76.
    6. Acharya, Kamlesh Kumar & Malhotra, Ravinder & Sendhil, R & Kumari, Binita, 2021. "Profit efficiency among peri-urban dairy farms in Odisha: an application of the stochastic frontier function," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 34(2), December.
    7. Kailash Chandra Pradhan & Shrabani Mukherjee, "undated". "Technical Efficiency of Agricultural Production in India: Evidence from REDS Survey," Working Papers 2017-161, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    8. Anik, Asif Reza & Eory, Vera & Begho, Toritseju & Rahman, Md. Mizanur, 2023. "Determinants of nitrogen use efficiency and gaseous emissions assessed from farm survey: A case of wheat in Bangladesh," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    9. Majumder, M.K & Mozumdar, L. & Roy, P.C, 2009. "Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency of Boro Rice Production," Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh Agricultural University Research System (BAURES), vol. 7.
    10. Manyeki John Kibara & Kuria Simon & Rono Julius & Mulei Benson, 2024. "The Levels and Determinants of Profit Efficiency in Fodder Production: A Case of Southern Rangelands of Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3), pages 2405-2414, March.
    11. Merkine Mogiso & Tesfaye Tarekegn, 2022. "Response of upland rice variety to plant population under the low land agro-ecology of Bench Sheko Zone, South-west Ethiopia," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 12(1), June.
    12. Patterson-Andrews, Hazel & Pemberton, Carlisle A., 2014. "Factors Affecting Profitability Of Small Scale Farming In Southern Trinidad & Tobago," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Susmita Dasgupta & Craig Meisner & David Wheeler, 2007. "Is Environmentally Friendly Agriculture Less Profitable for Farmers? Evidence on Integrated Pest Management in Bangladesh," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 103-118.
    14. Anik, Asif Reza & Bauer, Siegfried, 2015. "Impact of resource ownership and input market access on Bangladeshi paddy growers’ efficiency," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(3), April.
    15. Darko, Francis Addeah & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob, 2013. "Economic Efficiency and Subsidized Farm Inputs: Evidence from Malawi Maize Farmers," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 160685, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    16. Rahaman, Md Shajedur & Haque, Sadika & Sarkar, Md Abdur Rouf & Rahman, Mohammad Chhiddikur & Reza, Md Salim & Islam, Mohammad Ariful & Siddique, Md Abu Bakr, 2021. "A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Boro Rice Production in Dinajpur District of Bangladesh," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 67-77.
    17. Adeyemo, Remi & Kehinde, Ayodeji Damilola & Gbadebori, Nafisat Oluwatayo, 2023. "The Profit Efficiency Of Moringa Oleifera Production In Osun State, Nigeria," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 17(2), December.
    18. Md Abdus Salam & Asif Reza Anik, 2023. "Social safety nets and productivity outcomes: Evidence and implications for Bangladeshi rice growers," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 37(3), pages 401-428, September.
    19. Trinh Nguyen Chau & Frank Scrimgeour, 2022. "Productivity impacts of hybrid rice seeds in Vietnam," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 414-429, June.
    20. Nmadu, Job N. & Simpa, James O., 2014. "Rethinking The Technical Efficiency Of Small Scale Yam Farmers In Nigeria Using Conventional And Non-Conventional Inefficiency Parameters," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165866, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:23-:d:1010459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.