IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1335-d890730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Is Farmers’ Level of Satisfaction under China’s Policy of Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketisation?

Author

Listed:
  • Jiali Liu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqin 400715, China)

  • Hengwei Wang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqin 400715, China
    Centre for the Studies of Global Human Movement, University of Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB3 9DA, UK)

Abstract

The entry of collective-owned commercial construction land into the market is a major reform of China’s land management system, which will help promote the appreciation of rural land, establish a unified urban and rural construction land market, and help rural revitalisation and urban–rural integrated development. Based on the classic customer satisfaction index model, this study constructs a satisfaction model for farmers who enter the market with collective-owned commercial construction land. Farmers’ satisfaction is measured by 7 latent variables and the corresponding 22 observed variables, forming a causal chain containing 13 pairs of interactions. Taking as an example Dazu District of Chongqing City, one of the pilot areas where China’s collective-owned commercial construction land has come on the market, AMOS statistical analysis software is used to test the hypotheses. The research results show that: farmers’ information awareness has the greatest impact on farmers’ satisfaction; the higher farmers’ perceived quality is, the more they can improve their satisfaction; there is a significant relationship between farmers’ satisfaction, farmers’ complaints and farmers’ trust; and the three are closely related. Finally, based on the research results, we try to put forward targeted policy suggestions in order to provide a useful reference for government to push for the promotion of the collective-owned commercial construction land marketisation in other rural areas of China and its future improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiali Liu & Hengwei Wang, 2022. "What Is Farmers’ Level of Satisfaction under China’s Policy of Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketisation?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1335-:d:890730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongzhang Xu & Jamie Pittock & Katherine A. Daniell, 2021. "China: A New Trajectory Prioritizing Rural Rather Than Urban Development?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    2. Mingyu Zhang & Qiuxiao Chen & Kewei Zhang & Dongye Yang, 2021. "Will Rural Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketization Impact Local Governments’ Interest Distribution? Evidence from Mainland China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jenel Ituriaga & Klint Allen Mariñas & Charmine Sheena Saflor, 2024. "Enhancing Government Services to Rice Farmers in the Philippines: A Service Quality–Sustainability-Focused Approach for Long-Term Agricultural Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Guo, Jingpeng & Zhao, Yinghui & Li, Frank Yonghong & Mao, Kebiao & He, Jinfeng & He, Qiang, 2024. "Developing a land development compensation model for returned land in tract expropriation: Towards a unified urban-rural land market in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongshui Xie & Caiquan Bai & Huimin Wang & Qihang Xue, 2022. "The Land System and the Rise and Fall of China’s Rural Industrialization: Based on the Perspective of Institutional Change of Rural Collective Construction Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Lei Yan & Xubin Lei & Kairong Hong & Hui Li & Mengyuan Chen, 2022. "Improving Farmer Willingness to Participate in the Transfer of Land Rights in Rural China: A Preference-Based Income Distribution Scheme," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Yuan Yuan & Wentao Zhao & Hongqing Li & Han Mu, 2022. "Analyzing the Driving Mechanism of Rural Transition from the Perspective of Rural–Urban Continuum: A Case Study of Suzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Ying Lu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "A Discourse Analysis of 40 Years Rural Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Lin Zhou & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "Collective Action for the Market-Based Reform of Land Element in China: The Role of Trust," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Pengrui Wang & Chen Zeng & Yan Song & Long Guo & Wenping Liu & Wenting Zhang, 2021. "The Spatial Effect of Administrative Division on Land-Use Intensity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Zou, Yucheng & Yan, Lei & Zhang, Yanwei, 2023. "Game analysis of incremental income allocation in the marketization of rural collectively-owned commercial construction land under fairness preference," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Xu, Hongzhang & Pittock, Jamie & Daniell, Katherine, 2022. "‘Sustainability of what, for whom? A critical analysis of Chinese development induced displacement and resettlement (DIDR) programs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Chao Wei & Zuo Zhang & Sheng Ye & Mengxi Hong & Wenwen Wang, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Divergence and Driving Mechanisms of Urban-Rural Sustainable Development: An Empirical Study Based on Provincial Panel Data in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Shenjie Yang & Lanjiao Wen, 2023. "Regional Heterogeneity in China’s Rural Collectively Owned Commercialized Land Market: An Empirical Analysis from 2015–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Lin Zhou & Walter Timo de Vries & Alexandra Panman & Fei Gao & Chenyu Fang, 2023. "Evaluating Collective Action for Effective Land Policy Reform in Developing Country Contexts: The Construction and Validation of Dimensions and Indicators," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Fituma Lemessa & Belay Simane & Aseffa Seyoum & Girma Gebresenbet, 2023. "Development-Induced Impacts on the Livelihoods of Displaced Communities: The Case of Bole Lemi Industry Park, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Yubo Wang & Yuyu Xue & Jianchao Xi, 2022. "Inter-Provincial Differences in Potential Obstacles to Land Transfer Income to Support Rural Revitalization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Balta, Sıla & Atik, Meryem, 2022. "Rural planning guidelines for urban-rural transition zones as a tool for the protection of rural landscape characters and retaining urban sprawl: Antalya case from Mediterranean," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Muyan Tang & Hongzhang Xu, 2023. "Cultural Integration and Rural Tourism Development: A Scoping Literature Review," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Duanshuai Shen & Xiaoping Zhou & Shuai Xie & Xiao Lv & Wenlong Peng & Yanan Wang & Baiyuan Wang, 2024. "Paths and Mechanisms of Rural Transformation Promoted by Rural Collectively Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketization in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1335-:d:890730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.