IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i2p193-d734589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydromorphological Assessment as the Basis for Ecosystem Restoration in the Nanxi River Basin (China)

Author

Listed:
  • Helene Müller

    (Institute of Soil Bioengineering and Landscape Construction, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Stephan Hörbinger

    (Institute of Soil Bioengineering and Landscape Construction, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Fabian Franta

    (Institute of Soil Bioengineering and Landscape Construction, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria)

  • Ana Mendes

    (LabOr—Laboratório de Ornitologia, Universidade de Évora, MED—Instituto Mediterrâneo para a Agricultura, Ambiente e Desenvolvimento, Polo da Mitra, 7002-774 Evora, Portugal)

  • Jianhua Li

    (Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Ping Cao

    (China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Baiyin Baoligao

    (China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Fengran Xu

    (China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Hans Peter Rauch

    (Institute of Soil Bioengineering and Landscape Construction, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Hydromorphology is a major component of riverine ecosystems. Therefore, proper assessments of the status quo, as well as the detection of pressures in river basins, are of high relevance. Process-based morphological methods have been developed, relying on a broad data basis and resulting in suitable instruments, such as the Morphological Quality Index (MQI). In this study, the hydromorphological status of the Nanxi river system in Eastern China was assessed by an adapted application of the MQI. Adaptations and amendments in the methodical approach were developed in cycles and carried out to transfer the well-approved method for European river systems to another geographical setting. The strengths of the tested approach are the few data requirements, the applicability for modified river basins, and the decoupling of historical information. The assessment of 161 river kilometers resulted in a hydromorphological status quo with the focus being a relative comparison of different sections ranging from “moderate” to “bad”, with an average classification of a “poor” state. On the one hand, the results build the basis for future restoration and river management planning, specifically, and on the other hand, they create a foundation for the development of an assessment method fitted for modified river systems conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Helene Müller & Stephan Hörbinger & Fabian Franta & Ana Mendes & Jianhua Li & Ping Cao & Baiyin Baoligao & Fengran Xu & Hans Peter Rauch, 2022. "Hydromorphological Assessment as the Basis for Ecosystem Restoration in the Nanxi River Basin (China)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:193-:d:734589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/193/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/2/193/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Magliulo & Sofia Sessa & Angelo Cusano & Marika Beatrice & Alberto Giannini & Filippo Russo, 2022. "Assessing the Morphological Quality of the Calore River (Southern Italy)," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:193-:d:734589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.