IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i11p2039-d972312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coastal Wetland Vegetation Classification Using Pixel-Based, Object-Based and Deep Learning Methods Based on RGB-UAV

Author

Listed:
  • Jun-Yi Zheng

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Ying-Ying Hao

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Yuan-Chen Wang

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Si-Qi Zhou

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Wan-Ben Wu

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    UFZ—Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, 04318 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Qi Yuan

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Yu Gao

    (Key Laboratory of Fisheries Remote Sensing, East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai 200090, China
    School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Hai-Qiang Guo

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Xing-Xing Cai

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Bin Zhao

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, and Shanghai Institute of EcoChongming (SIEC), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

The advancement of deep learning (DL) technology and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) remote sensing has made it feasible to monitor coastal wetlands efficiently and precisely. However, studies have rarely compared the performance of DL with traditional machine learning (Pixel-Based (PB) and Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) methods) in UAV-based coastal wetland monitoring. We constructed a dataset based on RGB-based UAV data and compared the performance of PB, OBIA, and DL methods in the classification of vegetation communities in coastal wetlands. In addition, to our knowledge, the OBIA method was used for the UAV data for the first time in this paper based on Google Earth Engine (GEE), and the ability of GEE to process UAV data was confirmed. The results showed that in comparison with the PB and OBIA methods, the DL method achieved the most promising classification results, which was capable of reflecting the realistic distribution of the vegetation. Furthermore, the paradigm shifts from PB and OBIA to the DL method in terms of feature engineering, training methods, and reference data explained the considerable results achieved by the DL method. The results suggested that a combination of UAV, DL, and cloud computing platforms can facilitate long-term, accurate monitoring of coastal wetland vegetation at the local scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun-Yi Zheng & Ying-Ying Hao & Yuan-Chen Wang & Si-Qi Zhou & Wan-Ben Wu & Qi Yuan & Yu Gao & Hai-Qiang Guo & Xing-Xing Cai & Bin Zhao, 2022. "Coastal Wetland Vegetation Classification Using Pixel-Based, Object-Based and Deep Learning Methods Based on RGB-UAV," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:2039-:d:972312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/2039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/11/2039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward B. Barbier, 2013. "Valuing Ecosystem Services for Coastal Wetland Protection and Restoration: Progress and Challenges," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min Tan & Xiaotong Zhang & Weiqiang Luo & Ming Hao, 2023. "Deep Learning Based Spatial Distribution Estimation of Soil Pb Using Multi-Phase Multispectral Remote Sensing Images in a Mining Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perla Irasema Rivadeneyra García & Federico Cornacchia & Alberto Gabino Martínez Hernández & Marco Bidoia & Carlo Giupponi, 2024. "Multi-platform assessment of coastal protection and carbon sequestration in the Venice Lagoon under future scenarios," Working Papers 2024.13, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    2. Mandla Dlamini & George Chirima & Nebo Jovanovic & Elhadi Adam, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of Land Use on Surface Water Quality in the Lower uMfolozi Floodplain System, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Xiuzhong Li & Baocun Ji & Na Li & Qiuying Chen & Christopher J. Anderson & Yuexuan Wang, 2024. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Large-Scale Ecological Restoration Measures in the Liaohe Estuary Using a Landscape Pattern Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Deepanjana Saha & Devarajulu Suresh Kumar & Pandian Krishnan & Rajdeep Mukherjee & A. Vidhyavathi & M. Maheswari & M. Vijayabhama, 2024. "Balancing Nets and Lives: A Socio-Ecological Analysis of Sustainable Fisheries on the Indian Coast of the Gulf of Mannar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Rivadeneyra, Perla & Cornacchia, Federico & Martinez, Alberto & Bidoia, Marco & Giupponi, Carlo, 2024. "Multi-platform assessment of coastal protection and carbon sequestration in the Venice Lagoon under future scenarios," FEEM Working Papers 343511, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Alexander I. Belyaev & Anna M. Pugacheva & Evgenia A. Korneeva, 2022. "Assessment of Ecosystem Services of Wetlands of the Volga–Akhtuba Floodplain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Miriam Fernandez-Nunez & Helene Burningham & Pilar Díaz-Cuevas & José Ojeda-Zújar, 2019. "Evaluating the Response of Mediterranean-Atlantic Saltmarshes to Sea-Level Rise," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Hua Wang & Walter Keithly & Rex Caffey, 2019. "Factors Influencing Landowners’ Decisions for Income-Generating Activities on Private Coastal Wetland in Louisiana," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:2039-:d:972312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.