IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i7p694-d586938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourism-led Commodification of Place and Rural Transformation Development: A Case Study of Xixinan Village, Huangshan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Pinyu Chen

    (The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

  • Xiang Kong

    (The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
    School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

Abstract

Rural commodification with rural transformation development is a potential research agenda for rural geography. Based on semi-structured interviews in five times fieldwork in Xixinan Village, Huangshan, China, this article examines how the township government as an actor with entrepreneurialism promotes the commodification of place in rural areas and its impact on rural transformation development. It was found that the township government has drawn economic returns from different subjects of tourism entrepreneurs, tourists, and lifestyle immigrants by the efforts of commodifying real estate, creative tourism experience, and nature. Rural transformation development is accompanied by rural commodification, showing rural gentrification, expansion of employment opportunities for women, and the readjustment of the social structure of the family in the demographic structure. Rural tourism and rural creative industries have developed, complementing the single agricultural structure, constituting a mutual intersection and integration among these three industries. Regarding social and cultural values, rural commodification promoted the awareness of place in protecting ancient buildings and indigenous culture, but it also brought a sense of deprivation for community and contested rurality among different groups. The development state of rural transformation is constantly changing, and the new challenges arising from it to the rural revitalization of China, in this case, are also identified. The contribution of this article is to expand the analytical dimension of the commodification of place in rural areas and examine the state entrepreneurism associated with it. It also contributes to improving the understanding of the current development state of rural transformation in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinyu Chen & Xiang Kong, 2021. "Tourism-led Commodification of Place and Rural Transformation Development: A Case Study of Xixinan Village, Huangshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:694-:d:586938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/694/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/694/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer, Gerhard, 2018. "Producing nature for tourism: A political ecology angle," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 62-63.
    2. Karita Kan, 2019. "Accumulation without Dispossession? Land Commodification and Rent Extraction in Peri‐urban China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 633-648, July.
    3. Huang, Yaofu & Hui, Eddie C.M. & Zhou, Jinmiao & Lang, Wei & Chen, Tingting & Li, Xun, 2020. "Rural Revitalization in China: Land-Use Optimization through the Practice of Place-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenli Jing & Wei Zhang & Pingping Luo & Lian Wu & Lei Wang & Kanhua Yu, 2022. "Assessment of Synergistic Development Potential between Tourism and Rural Restructuring Using a Coupling Analysis: A Case Study of Southern Shaanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Chen Wei & Guoquan Zheng, 2023. "Measuring and Evaluating the Commodification of Sustainable Rural Living Areas in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Ledi Wen & Lei Sima, 2022. "Analysis of Outdoor Activity Space-Use Preferences in Rural Communities: An Example from Puxiu and Yuanyi Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Lin Fu & Junko Sanada, 2023. "Spatial Patterns and Influencing Factors of Rural Land Commodification at Township Scale: A Case Study in Shijiazhuang City, North China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Zhenshan Yang & Shuying Zhang & Jiaming Liu & Huijuan Sun, 2022. "Network of Tourism–Industrial Complex in Cities: Typologies and Implications through a Critical Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Jin-Chun Huang & Jian Wang & Qiang Nong & Jin-Fei Xu, 2023. "Using a Modified DANP-mV Model to Explore the Improvement Strategy for Sustainable Development of Rural Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Xiaoqing Zhao & Yifei Xu & Qian Wang & Junwei Pu & Xiaoqian Shi & Pei Huang & Zexian Gu, 2022. "Sustainable Agricultural Development Models of the Ecologically Vulnerable Karst Areas in Southeast Yunnan from the Perspective of Human–Earth Areal System," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinhui Wu & Luan Chen & Li Ma & Liru Cai & Xun Li, 2023. "Return migration, rural household investment decision, and poverty alleviation: Evidence from rural Guangdong, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 304-325, March.
    2. Jieying Yang & Li Yu & Jingxiang Zhang, 2024. "Impacts on Rural Community Development and Governance by Different Land Ownership: A Comparative Study Based on Two Villages in China," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(6), pages 1616-1635, December.
    3. Jing Zhang & Bingbing Huang & Xinming Chen & Congmou Zhu & Muye Gan, 2022. "Multidimensional Evaluation of the Quality of Rural Life Using Big Data from the Perspective of Common Prosperity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Helga Leitner & Samuel Nowak & Eric Sheppard, 2023. "Everyday speculation in the remaking of peri-urban livelihoods and landscapes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 388-406, March.
    5. Bin Yang & Jun He, 2021. "Global Land Grabbing: A Critical Review of Case Studies across the World," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Azadi, Hossein, 2022. "From scythe to smartphone: Rural transformation in Romania evidenced by the perception of rural land and population," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Dachen Sheng & Heather A. Montgomery, 2024. "Charting Pollution Effects on Tourism: A Regional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Tao, Zhou & Guanghui, Jiang & Wenqiu, Ma & Ruijuan, Zhang & Yingying, Tian & Qinglei, Zhao & Yaya, Tian, 2024. "A framework for identifying the distribution of revitalization potential of idle rural residential land under rural revitalization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Wong, Siu Wai & Dai, Yao & Tang, Bo-sin & Liu, Jinlong, 2021. "A new model of village urbanization? Coordinative governance of state-village relations in Guangzhou City, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Lin Zhou & Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "Collective Action for the Market-Based Reform of Land Element in China: The Role of Trust," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Lixin Liu & Jiawen Chen & Qingnan Cai & Yaofu Huang & Wei Lang, 2020. "System Building and Multistakeholder Involvement in Public Participatory Community Planning through Both Collaborative- and Micro-Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Jingjie Liu & Min Xia, 2023. "Influencing Factors Analysis and Optimization of Land Use Allocation: Combining MAS with MOPSO Procedure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Martina Slámová & Alexandra Kruse & Ingrid Belčáková & Johannes Dreer, 2021. "Old but Not Old Fashioned: Agricultural Landscapes as European Heritage and Basis for Sustainable Multifunctional Farming to Earn a Living," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Lin Fu & Junko Sanada, 2023. "Spatial Patterns and Influencing Factors of Rural Land Commodification at Township Scale: A Case Study in Shijiazhuang City, North China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Sa, Haoxuan, 2020. "Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Liao, Chuan & Agrawal, Arun, 2024. "Towards a science of ‘land grabbing’," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Xiaojing Li & Yanhua Li & Zhe Chen, 2024. "Impact of Rural E-Commerce Participation on Farmers’ Household Development Resilience: Evidence from 1229 Farmers in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Lin, Yongyuan & Shui, Wei & Li, Zhipan & Huang, Shan & Wu, Kexin & Sun, Xiaorui & Liang, Jingchen, 2021. "Green space optimization for rural vitality: Insights for planning and policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Caiyao Xu & Chen Qian & Wencai Yang & Bowei Li & Lingqian Kong & Fanbin Kong, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Pattern of Urban-Rural Integration Development and Its Driving Mechanism Analysis in Hangzhou Bay Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Austin Dziwornu Ablo & Bjørn Enge Bertelsen, 2022. "A SHADOWY ‘CITY OF LIGHT’: Private Urbanism, Large‐Scale Land Acquisition and Dispossession in Ghana," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 370-386, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:694-:d:586938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.