IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i6p648-d577015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Urban Poverty Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Approaches: Implications for Housing Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Guie Li

    (School of Public Policy & Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Zhongliang Cai

    (School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yun Qian

    (School of Urban Planning and Design, Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Fei Chen

    (Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute, Guangzhou 510060, China)

Abstract

Enriching Asian perspectives on the rapid identification of urban poverty and its implications for housing inequality, this paper contributes empirical evidence about the utility of image features derived from high-resolution satellite imagery and machine learning approaches for identifying urban poverty in China at the community level. For the case of the Jiangxia District and Huangpi District of Wuhan, image features, including perimeter, line segment detector (LSD), Hough transform, gray-level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM), histogram of oriented gradients (HoG), and local binary patterns (LBP), are calculated, and four machine learning approaches and 25 variables are applied to identify urban poverty and relatively important variables. The results show that image features and machine learning approaches can be used to identify urban poverty with the best model performance with a coefficient of determination, R 2 , of 0.5341 and 0.5324 for Jiangxia and Huangpi, respectively, although some differences exist among the approaches and study areas. The importance of each variable differs for each approach and study area; however, the relatively important variables are similar. In particular, four variables achieved relatively satisfactory prediction results for all models and presented obvious differences in varying communities with different poverty levels. Housing inequality within low-income neighborhoods, which is a response to gaps in wealth, income, and housing affordability among social groups, is an important manifestation of urban poverty. Policy makers can implement these findings to rapidly identify urban poverty, and the findings have potential applications for addressing housing inequality and proving the rationality of urban planning for building a sustainable society.

Suggested Citation

  • Guie Li & Zhongliang Cai & Yun Qian & Fei Chen, 2021. "Identifying Urban Poverty Using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Approaches: Implications for Housing Inequality," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:648-:d:577015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucci, Paula & Bhatkal, Tanvi & Khan, Amina, 2018. "Are we underestimating urban poverty?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 297-310.
    2. Appleton, Simon & Song, Lina & Xia, Qingjie, 2010. "Growing out of Poverty: Trends and Patterns of Urban Poverty in China 1988-2002," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 665-678, May.
    3. Juan C. Duque & Vicente Royuela & Miguel Noreña, 2012. "A Stepwise Procedure to Determinate a Suitable Scale for the Spatial Delimitation of Urban Slums," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Esteban Fernández Vázquez & Fernando Rubiera Morollón (ed.), Defining the Spatial Scale in Modern Regional Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 237-254, Springer.
    4. Hu, Lirong & He, Shenjing & Luo, Yun & Su, Shiliang & Xin, Jing & Weng, Min, 2020. "A social-media-based approach to assessing the effectiveness of equitable housing policy in mitigating education accessibility induced social inequalities in Shanghai, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Hu, Lirong & He, Shenjing & Han, Zixuan & Xiao, He & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min & Cai, Zhongliang, 2019. "Monitoring housing rental prices based on social media:An integrated approach of machine-learning algorithms and hedonic modeling to inform equitable housing policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 657-673.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aziza Usmanova & Ahmed Aziz & Dilshodjon Rakhmonov & Walid Osamy, 2022. "Utilities of Artificial Intelligence in Poverty Prediction: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-39, October.
    2. Ziqi Zhou & Yung Yau, 2021. "The Small Property Rights Housing Institution in Mainland China: The Perspective of Substitutability of Institutional Functions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Yiting Su & Jing Li & Dongchuan Wang & Jiabao Yue & Xingguang Yan, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Synergy between Urban Built-Up Areas and Poverty Transformation in Tibet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Nattapong Puttanapong & Amornrat Luenam & Pit Jongwattanakul, 2022. "Spatial Analysis of Inequality in Thailand: Applications of Satellite Data and Spatial Statistics/Econometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Peng & Hui Mao, 2023. "The Effect of Digital Financial Inclusion on Relative Poverty Among Urban Households: A Case Study on China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 377-407, January.
    2. Sheng Li & Yi Jiang & Shuisong Ke & Ke Nie & Chao Wu, 2021. "Understanding the Effects of Influential Factors on Housing Prices by Combining Extreme Gradient Boosting and a Hedonic Price Model (XGBoost-HPM)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Wu, Chao & Du, Yihao & Li, Sheng & Liu, Pengyu & Ye, Xinyue, 2022. "Does visual contact with green space impact housing pricesʔ An integrated approach of machine learning and hedonic modeling based on the perception of green space," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    5. Janz, Teresa & Augsburg, Britta & Gassmann, Franziska & Nimeh, Zina, 2023. "Leaving no one behind: Urban poverty traps in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Moisés Obaco & Juan Pablo Díaz-Sánchez, 2018. "“Urbanization in Ecuador: An overview using the FUA definition”," IREA Working Papers 201814, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Oct 2018.
    7. Chen, Shaohua & Ravallion, Martin, 2021. "Reconciling the conflicting narratives on poverty in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Tingzhu Li & Ran Liu & Wei Qi, 2019. "Regional Heterogeneity of Migrant Rent Affordability Stress in Urban China: A Comparison between Skilled and Unskilled Migrants at Prefecture Level and Above," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Kangxu Wang & Weifeng Wang & Tongtong Li & Shengjun Wen & Xin Fu & Xinhao Wang, 2023. "Optimizing Living Service Amenities for Diverse Urban Residents: A Supply and Demand Balancing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Tom Wilson & Irina Grossman & Monica Alexander & Phil Rees & Jeromey Temple, 2022. "Methods for Small Area Population Forecasts: State-of-the-Art and Research Needs," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 865-898, June.
    11. Jiangtao Zhao & Li Liu & Ying Wang & Keming Tang & Miao Huo & Yang Zhao, 2023. "Evaluation of Sustainable Development of the Urban Ecological Environment and Its Coupling Relationship with Human Activities Based on Multi-Source Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Zhang, Chunni & Xu, Qi & Zhou, Xiang & Zhang, Xiaobo & Xie, Yu, 2014. "Are poverty rates underestimated in China? New evidence from four recent surveys," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 410-425.
    13. Chucai Peng & Yang Xiang & Luxia Chen & Yangyang Zhang & Zhixiang Zhou, 2023. "The Impact of the Type and Abundance of Urban Blue Space on House Prices: A Case Study of Eight Megacities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, April.
    14. Yingzi Chen & Yaqi Hu & Lina Lai, 2022. "Demography-Oriented Urban Spatial Matching of Service Facilities: Case Study of Changchun, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Alice Barreca, 2022. "Architectural Quality and the Housing Market: Values of the Late Twentieth Century Built Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Shenggen Fan & Ravi Kanbur & Shang-Jin Wei & Xiaobo Zhang, 2013. "The Economics of China: Successes and Challenges," NBER Working Papers 19648, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Liu, Xuan & Tong, De & Huang, Jiangming & Zheng, Wenfeng & Kong, Minghui & Zhou, Guohui, 2022. "What matters in the e-commerce era? Modelling and mapping shop rents in Guangzhou, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    18. Fei Yan, 2018. "Urban poverty, economic restructuring and poverty reduction policy in urban China: Evidence from Shanghai, 1978–2008," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(4), pages 465-481, July.
    19. Sidong Zhao & Kaixu Zhao & Ping Zhang, 2021. "Spatial Inequality in China’s Housing Market and the Driving Mechanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-33, August.
    20. Ding, Kangzhe & Itoh, Ryo, 2023. "JUE Insight: The impact of the school admission restriction policy on the housing market in Shanghai," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:648-:d:577015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.