IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i4p419-d536703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing an Ecosystem Services-Based Approach for Land Use Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbo Cai

    (School of Design & China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environment Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Wei Jiang

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environment Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Yongli Cai

    (School of Design & China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has altered many ecosystems, causing the decline in many ecosystem services (ES), and generating serious ecological crisis. The Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region is one of the most rapidly urbanized regions in China and has experienced a remarkable period of population growth, and built-up area expansion. To cope with these challenges, this paper proposed a four-step key ES zone delineation framework by land-use matrix for land management in a rapidly urbanizing region. This framework was applied in key ES zone delineation in the YRD region. The results showed that there was obvious spatial heterogeneity in the distribution of total ES capacities: The high-capacity levels were mainly distributed in the south of the region, while the low-capacity levels were densely distributed in the middle and north of the region. V (80–100) and II (20–40) accounted for 27.44% and 47.12% of the total area, respectively. Among the five levels, Level II occupied the largest area of the region. I (0–20) and IV (60–80) had patchy patterns in the region and clustered in the middle of the region. I and IV accounted for 13.24% and 5.48% of the total area, respectively. III (40–60) had belt distribution in the region and accounted for 6.72% of the total area. This paper not only contributes to the guidance of land management for the Ecological Redline Policy in the YRD Region but also helps to improve the application of ecosystem service approach in decision support in rapidly urbanizing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbo Cai & Wei Jiang & Yongli Cai, 2021. "Developing an Ecosystem Services-Based Approach for Land Use Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:419-:d:536703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacobs, Sander & Burkhard, Benjamin & Van Daele, Toon & Staes, Jan & Schneiders, Anik, 2015. "‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Bao, Junlin & Gao, Shu & Ge, Jianxiong, 2019. "Dynamic land use and its policy in response to environmental and social-economic changes in China: A case study of the Jiangsu coast (1750–2015)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 169-180.
    3. Fisher, Brendan & Turner, R. Kerry & Morling, Paul, 2009. "Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 643-653, January.
    4. Tian, Guangjin & Jiang, Jing & Yang, Zhifeng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2011. "The urban growth, size distribution and spatio-temporal dynamic pattern of the Yangtze River Delta megalopolitan region, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 865-878.
    5. Crossman, Neville D. & Burkhard, Benjamin & Nedkov, Stoyan & Willemen, Louise & Petz, Katalin & Palomo, Ignacio & Drakou, Evangelia G. & Martín-Lopez, Berta & McPhearson, Timon & Boyanova, Kremena & A, 2013. "A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 4-14.
    6. Yang Bai & Christina P. Wong & Bo Jiang & Alice C. Hughes & Min Wang & Qing Wang, 2018. "Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Jiang, Bo & Bai, Yang & Wong, Christina P. & Xu, Xibao & Alatalo, Juha M., 2019. "China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 111-114.
    8. Wenbo Cai & Tong Wu & Wei Jiang & Wanting Peng & Yongli Cai, 2020. "Integrating Ecosystem Services Supply–Demand and Spatial Relationships for Intercity Cooperation: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Qian Li & Xuefeng Zhang & Qingfu Liu & Yang Liu & Yong Ding & Qing Zhang, 2017. "Impact of Land Use Intensity on Ecosystem Services: An Example from the Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Central Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
    10. Nin, Mariana & Soutullo, Alvaro & Rodríguez-Gallego, Lorena & Di Minin, Enrico, 2016. "Ecosystem services-based land planning for environmental impact avoidance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 172-184.
    11. Caiyao Xu & Lijie Pu & Ming Zhu & Jianguo Li & Xinjian Chen & Xiaohan Wang & Xuefeng Xie, 2016. "Ecological Security and Ecosystem Services in Response to Land Use Change in the Coastal Area of Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Zhang, Yu, 2010. "Yangtze River Delta's system integration: institutional barriers and countermeasures," IDE Discussion Papers 264, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ji Zhang & Zelin Liu & Yu Shi & Ziying Zou, 2022. "Spatial Response of Ecosystem Service Value to Urbanization in Fragile Vegetation Areas Based on Terrain Gradient," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Wenbo Cai & Wei Jiang & Hongyu Du & Ruishan Chen & Yongli Cai, 2021. "Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Vilém Pechanec & Helena Kilianová & Elwis Tangwa & Alena Vondráková & Ivo Machar, 2019. "What is the Development Capacity for Provision of Ecosystem Services in the Czech Republic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Czúcz, Bálint & Arany, Ildikó & Potschin-Young, Marion & Bereczki, Krisztina & Kertész, Miklós & Kiss, Márton & Aszalós, Réka & Haines-Young, Roy, 2018. "Where concepts meet the real world: A systematic review of ecosystem service indicators and their classification using CICES," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 145-157.
    4. Wei, Hejie & Fan, Weiguo & Wang, Xuechao & Lu, Nachuan & Dong, Xiaobin & Zhao, Yanan & Ya, Xijia & Zhao, Yifei, 2017. "Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 15-27.
    5. Balzan, Mario V & Caruana, Julio & Zammit, Annrica, 2018. "Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 711-725.
    6. Vahid Amini Parsa & Esmail Salehi & Ahmad Reza Yavari & Peter M van Bodegom, 2019. "An improved method for assessing mismatches between supply and demand in urban regulating ecosystem services: A case study in Tabriz, Iran," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Jennifer Hodbod & Emma Tebbs & Kristofer Chan & Shubhechchha Sharma, 2019. "Integrating Participatory Methods and Remote Sensing to Enhance Understanding of Ecosystem Service Dynamics Across Scales," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-30, August.
    8. Grilli, Gianluca & Fratini, Roberto & Marone, Enrico & Sacchelli, Sandro, 2020. "A spatial-based tool for the analysis of payments for forest ecosystem services related to hydrogeological protection," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Jacobs, Sander & Burkhard, Benjamin & Van Daele, Toon & Staes, Jan & Schneiders, Anik, 2015. "‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 21-30.
    10. Häyhä, Tiina & Franzese, Pier Paolo & Paletto, Alessandro & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 12-23.
    11. Bo Jiang & Yuanyuan Chen & Yang Bai & Xibao Xu, 2019. "Supply–Demand Coupling Mechanisms for Policy Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-8, October.
    12. Gudrun Schwilch & Tatenda Lemann & Örjan Berglund & Carlo Camarotto & Artemi Cerdà & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Silvia Kohnová & Dominika Krzeminska & Teodoro Marañón & René Rietra & Grzegorz Siebiele, 2018. "Assessing Impacts of Soil Management Measures on Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Charles, Michael & Ziv, Guy & Bohrer, Gil & Bakshi, Bhavik R., 2020. "Connecting air quality regulating ecosystem services with beneficiaries through quantitative serviceshed analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    14. Willcock, Simon & Hooftman, Danny & Sitas, Nadia & O’Farrell, Patrick & Hudson, Malcolm D. & Reyers, Belinda & Eigenbrod, Felix & Bullock, James M., 2016. "Do ecosystem service maps and models meet stakeholders’ needs? A preliminary survey across sub-Saharan Africa," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 110-117.
    15. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    16. Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & Cristina Herrero-Jáuregui & María F. Schmitz, 2021. "Recreational and Nature-Based Tourism as a Cultural Ecosystem Service. Assessment and Mapping in a Rural-Urban Gradient of Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Lia Laporta & Tiago Domingos & Cristina Marta-Pedroso, 2021. "Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems Services under the Proposed MAES European Common Framework: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-28, October.
    18. Das, Manob & Das, Arijit & Saikh, Selim, 2024. "Estimating supply-demand mismatches for optimization of sustainable land use planning in a rapidly growing urban agglomeration (India)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Kaczorowska, Anna & Kain, Jaan-Henrik & Kronenberg, Jakub & Haase, Dagmar, 2016. "Ecosystem services in urban land use planning: Integration challenges in complex urban settings—Case of Stockholm," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 204-212.
    20. Gordon N. Merrick, 2021. "A Lens for Analysis of Payment for Ecosystem Services Systems: Transitioning the Working Lands Economic Sector from Extractive Industry to Regenerative System," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:419-:d:536703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.