IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i1p49-d476350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Legal Element of Fixing the Boundary for Indonesian Complete Cadastre

Author

Listed:
  • Dwi Budi Martono

    (Doctoral Study Program in Geomatics Engineering, Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jalan Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia)

  • Trias Aditya

    (Doctoral Study Program in Geomatics Engineering, Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jalan Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia)

  • Subaryono Subaryono

    (Doctoral Study Program in Geomatics Engineering, Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jalan Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia)

  • Prijono Nugroho

    (Doctoral Study Program in Geomatics Engineering, Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jalan Grafika No. 2, Yogyakarta 55284, Indonesia)

Abstract

In 2017, the Indonesian government implemented the systematic land registration (PTSL) process, projected to be finished by 2025. However, this process faces some challenges in the spatial and legal data collection process, resulting in the Indonesian cadastral system still being incomplete. For instance, during the three years of its implementation, out of about 135 million parcels, only 49.5% have been registered. Therefore, the level of completeness needs to be improved. This research aims to assess the compliance of the fixed boundary process’ legal elements, such as the parties that locate the boundary, agreement between the adjoining landowners, and boundary markers. This is a piece of qualitative research in which the data were obtained through interviews from questionnaire surveys to land administration policymakers. Subsequently, the research carried out regulation assessments to develop a country-context cadastre typology of the current cadastral mapping activities. Data were obtained from the results of the PTSL campaign in the Madiun regency. The result showed that the high percentage (i.e., 96.61%) of legal elements regarding the boundary agreement in a rural area could be used as a potential enabler towards achieving completion of the Indonesian cadastre.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwi Budi Martono & Trias Aditya & Subaryono Subaryono & Prijono Nugroho, 2021. "The Legal Element of Fixing the Boundary for Indonesian Complete Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:49-:d:476350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/1/49/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/1/49/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arruñada, Benito, 2018. "Evolving practice in land demarcation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 661-675.
    2. Grant, Donald & Enemark, Stig & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Mitchell, David & McCamley, Geoffrey, 2020. "The Cadastral triangular model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Hendriks, Bob & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Bennett, Rohan & Antonio, Danilo, 2019. "Pro-poor land administration: Towards practical, coordinated, and scalable recording systems for all," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-38.
    4. Trias Aditya & Eva Maria-Unger & Christelle vd Berg & Rohan Bennett & Paul Saers & Han Lukman Syahid & Doni Erwan & Tjeerd Wits & Nurrohmat Widjajanti & Purnama Budi Santosa & Dedi Atunggal & Imam Han, 2020. "Participatory Land Administration in Indonesia: Quality and Usability Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, March.
    5. Rahmatizadeh, Shima & Rajabifard, Abbas & Kalantari, Mohsen & Ho, Serene, 2018. "A framework for selecting a fit-for-purpose data collection method in land administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 162-171.
    6. Xianghuan Luo & Rohan Mark Bennett & Mila Koeva & Christiaan Lemmen, 2017. "Investigating Semi-Automated Cadastral Boundaries Extraction from Airborne Laser Scanned Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahsa Mesgar & Diego Ramirez-Lovering, 2021. "Informal Land Rights and Infrastructure Retrofit: A Typology of Land Rights in Informal Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Stig Enemark & Robin McLaren & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Dwi Budi Martono & Trias Aditya & S Subaryono & Prijono Nugroho, 2022. "Cadastre Typology as a Baseline for Incremental Improvement of Spatial Cadastre in Jakarta: Towards a Complete Cadastre," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Mekonnen Tesfaye Metaferia & Rohan Mark Bennett & Berhanu Kefale Alemie & Mila Koeva, 2022. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Framework for Effective Land Administration: Synthesis of Contemporary Experiences," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Trias Aditya & Eva Maria-Unger & Christelle vd Berg & Rohan Bennett & Paul Saers & Han Lukman Syahid & Doni Erwan & Tjeerd Wits & Nurrohmat Widjajanti & Purnama Budi Santosa & Dedi Atunggal & Imam Han, 2020. "Participatory Land Administration in Indonesia: Quality and Usability Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Mahsa Mesgar & Diego Ramirez-Lovering, 2021. "Informal Land Rights and Infrastructure Retrofit: A Typology of Land Rights in Informal Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Scanlan, Oliver & Siraj, Nasrin & Ritchil, Parag & Mankin, Shamsagor, 2024. "Is “pro-poor land administration” a realistic proposition? How a land survey in Bangladesh reproduced and reconfigured gendered and racialised poverty," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Aditya, Trias & Sucaya, I Ketut Gede Ary & Nugroho Adi, Fajar, 2021. "LADM-compliant field data collector for cadastral surveyors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Serene Ho & Pranab R. Choudhury & Nivedita Haran & Rebecca Leshinsky, 2021. "Decentralization as a Strategy to Scale Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration: An Indian Perspective on Institutional Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Ercan, Orhan, 2023. "Evolution of the cadastre renewal understanding in Türkiye: A fit-for-purpose renewal model proposal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Zaid Abubakari & Christine Richter & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2020. "Evaluating Some Major Assumptions in Land Registration: Insights from Ghana’s Context of Land Tenure and Registration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Diao, Liang & Song, Huiqian, 2024. "Does improved tenure security reduce fires? Evidence from the Greece land registry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Kabigi, B. & de Vries, Walter T. & Kelvin, H., 2021. "A neo-institutional analysis of alternative land registration systems in Tanzania: The cases of Babati and Iringa districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    12. Griffith-Charles, Charisse & Sutherland, Michael, 2020. "3D cadastres for densely occupied informal situations: Necessity and possibility," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Ragil Haryanto & Imam Buchori & Nany Yuliastuti & Ibnu Saleh & Agung Sugiri & Bagus Nuari & Nisriena Rachmi Putri, 2020. "Preparedness to Implement a Spatial Plan: The Impact of the Land Cooperative in Central Bangka Regency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Hafte Gebreselassie Gebrihet & Pregala Pillay, 2021. "Emerging Challenges and Prospects of Digital Transformation and Stakeholders Integration in Urban Land Administration in Ethiopia," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 13(3), pages 341-356, September.
    15. Uma Shankar Panday & Raja Ram Chhatkuli & Janak Raj Joshi & Jagat Deuja & Danilo Antonio & Stig Enemark, 2021. "Securing Land Rights for All through Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approach: The Case of Nepal," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Fabbri, Marco, 2021. "Property rights and prosocial behavior: Evidence from a land tenure reform implemented as randomized control-trial," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 552-566.
    17. Ullah, Ayat & Zeb, Alam & Saqib, Shahab E. & Kächele, Harald, 2022. "Landscape co-management and livelihood sustainability: Lessons learned from the billion trees afforestation project in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    18. Guler, Dogus & Yomralioglu, Tahsin, 2022. "Reviewing the literature on the tripartite cycle containing digital building permit, 3D city modeling, and 3D property ownership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    19. Julia Velastegui-Cáceres & Víctor M. Rodríguez-Espinosa & Oswaldo Padilla-Almeida, 2020. "Urban Cadastral Situation in Ecuador: Analysis to Determine the Degree of Proximity of the Cadastral Systems to the 3D Cadastral Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Crompvoets, Joep, 2021. "Governance assessment of UAV implementation in Kenyan land administration system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:49-:d:476350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.