IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i2p80-d1583365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Technical Efficiency in the Oil and Gas Sector: The Role of CEO Characteristics and Board Composition

Author

Listed:
  • Kaouther Zaabouti

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Sfax, Sfax 3018, Tunisia)

  • Ezzeddine Ben Mohamed

    (Department of Accounting, College of Business and Economics, Qassim University, P.O. Box 6640, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study investigates how CEO characteristics, board composition, and firm size influence the technical efficiency (TE) of energy firms. We aim to understand how these factors contribute to production inefficiencies, which may help explain fluctuations in oil prices. Using stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), we analyze data from 100 American energy firms over the period from 2006 to 2019. Our results show that inefficiencies in production are primarily driven by specific CEO traits, the size and structure of the board, and the overall size of the firm. Based on the findings of this study, we recommend focusing on the selection of executive managers with specific qualifications, particularly those with extensive experience in managing oil and gas companies. Leadership positions should prioritize seasoned managers with accumulated expertise in this sector, and preference should be given to candidates with advanced educational backgrounds. Encouraging CEOs to acquire equity stakes in the company can significantly boost the technical efficiency of oil and gas firms. Additionally, offering competitive salaries and performance-based bonuses may further enhance managerial effectiveness and drive technical improvements. In addition, expanding the size of boards of directors in oil and gas companies is also anticipated to positively influence their technical efficiency. Finally, pursuing mergers and acquisitions to grow the scale of oil and gas companies represents a strategic approach to improving operational efficiency while contributing to the stability of global energy prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaouther Zaabouti & Ezzeddine Ben Mohamed, 2025. "Enhancing Technical Efficiency in the Oil and Gas Sector: The Role of CEO Characteristics and Board Composition," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:80-:d:1583365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/80/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/80/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aditi Bhattacharyya & Sudeshna Pal, 2013. "Financial reforms and technical efficiency in Indian commercial banking: A generalized stochastic frontier analysis," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 109-117, September.
    2. Rajkovic, Tijana, 2020. "Lead independent directors and investment efficiency," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Vincent L. Barker , III & George C. Mueller, 2002. "CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 782-801, June.
    4. Ahn, Seoungpil & Shrestha, Keshab, 2013. "The differential effects of classified boards on firm value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 3993-4013.
    5. Burak Güner, A. & Malmendier, Ulrike & Tate, Geoffrey, 2008. "Financial expertise of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 323-354, May.
    6. Bozec, Richard & Dia, Mohamed, 2007. "Board structure and firm technical efficiency: Evidence from Canadian state-owned enterprises," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1734-1750, March.
    7. Hanousek, Jan & Kočenda, Evžen & Mašika, Michal, 2012. "Firm efficiency: Domestic owners, coalitions, and FDI," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 471-486.
    8. Ertürk, Mehmet & Türüt-AsIk, Serap, 2011. "Efficiency analysis of Turkish natural gas distribution companies by using data envelopment analysis method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1426-1438, March.
    9. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, December.
    10. Fenn, Paul & Vencappa, Dev & Diacon, Stephen & Klumpes, Paul & O'Brien, Chris, 2008. "Market structure and the efficiency of European insurance companies: A stochastic frontier analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 86-100, January.
    11. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide, 2014. "ICTs and time-span in technical efficiency gains. A stochastic frontier approach over a panel of Italian manufacturing firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 55-65.
    12. Coles, Jeffrey L. & Daniel, Naveen D. & Naveen, Lalitha, 2008. "Boards: Does one size fit all," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 329-356, February.
    13. Liu, Yu & Miletkov, Mihail K. & Wei, Zuobao & Yang, Tina, 2015. "Board independence and firm performance in China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 223-244.
    14. Habtamu Tesfaye Edjigu, 2016. "Firm Growth and Technical Efficiency in Ethiopia: The Role of Firm Size and Finance," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(10), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tran, Hai & Turkiela, Jason, 2020. "The powers that be: Concentration of authority within the board of directors and variability in firm performance☆," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Ahmed Bouteska, 2020. "Do Board Characteristics Affect Bank Performance? Evidence from the Eurozone," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(6), pages 535-548, October.
    3. Bennouri, Moez & Chtioui, Tawhid & Nagati, Haithem & Nekhili, Mehdi, 2018. "Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 267-291.
    4. Liu, Yu, 2020. "The comparative and interactive effects of political, academic and financial directors," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 546-565.
    5. Ben Slimane, Faten & Padilla Angulo, Laura, 2019. "Strategic change and corporate governance: Evidence from the stock exchange industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 206-218.
    6. Alexander Merz, 2020. "Expensing performance-vested executive stock options: is there underreporting under IFRS 2?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 461-493, April.
    7. Berger, Allen N. & Kick, Thomas & Schaeck, Klaus, 2014. "Executive board composition and bank risk taking," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 48-65.
    8. Castiglione, Concetta & Infante, Davide & Zieba, Marta, 2023. "Public support for performing arts. Efficiency and productivity gains in eleven European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Gopalan, Radhakrishnan & Gormley, Todd A. & Kalda, Ankit, 2021. "It’s not so bad: Director bankruptcy experience and corporate risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 261-292.
    10. Xie, Linlin & Liu, Yangbo & Jiang, Tianhao, 2024. "Executives with business education background and cost of debt financing: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 283-296.
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/69eil0vrec871ooabetqvq0okj is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    13. Ji, Jiao & Talavera, Oleksandr & Yin, Shuxing, 2016. "CEO Dismissal, Compensation and Topics of Board Meetings: The Case of China," MPRA Paper 70232, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Jihai Lu & Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Rashid Latief & Tao Jiang & Tze San Ong, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Association of Internal Corporate Governance and Profitability; Evidence from Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Bill B. Francis & Iftekhar Hasan & Qiang Wu, 2012. "Do corporate boards matter during the current financial crisis?," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 39-52, April.
    16. Renee B. Adams & Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2010. "The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 58-107, March.
    17. Etienne Redor, 2016. "Board attributes and shareholder wealth in mergers and acquisitions: a survey of the literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 789-821, December.
    18. Ruihao Ke & Meng Li & Yuan Zhang, 2020. "Directors' Informational Role in Corporate Voluntary Disclosure: An Analysis of Directors from Related Industries†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 392-418, March.
    19. Bill Francis & Iftekhar Hasan & Michael Koetter & Qiang Wu, 2012. "Corporate Boards And Bank Loan Contracting," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 35(4), pages 521-552, December.
    20. Hanousek, Jan & Kočenda, Evžen & Shamshur, Anastasiya, 2015. "Corporate efficiency in Europe," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 24-40.
    21. Schmidt, Breno, 2015. "Costs and benefits of friendly boards during mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 424-447.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:80-:d:1583365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.