IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i2p105-d1593577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Factors Affecting Loan Loss Reserves in the US Financial Sector: A Dynamic Panel Regression Analysis with Fixed-Effects Models

Author

Listed:
  • Georgia Zournatzidou

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Western Macedonia, GR51100 Grevena, Greece)

  • George Sklavos

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Thessaly, GR41500 Larissa, Greece)

  • Konstantina Ragazou

    (Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Western Macedonia, GR50100 Kozani, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Sariannidis

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Western Macedonia, GR50100 Kozani, Greece)

Abstract

Loan loss reserve accounts are an important part of banks’ ability to sustain losses. However, to enhance such protection, executives in the banking sector should recognize the factors that can affect the management of loan loss reserves. This study sought to investigate a novel set of macroeconomic and non-macroeconomic factors that can have an impact on the LLR ratios of banks in the United States (US). Data were retrieved from the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) database, considering the population of the banks in the US for the fiscal years 2015 to 2023. Dynamic panel regression methods, including ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed-effects models (FEMs), and random-effects models (REMs), were used to reach the research goal. The results demonstrate that both macroeconomic and non-macroeconomic factors significantly influence the behavior of LLRs in the United States. We clearly recognized industrial production as the macroeconomic indicator with the highest influence on LLRs, accurately representing the sector’s activity level through its calculation. The research findings demonstrate that industrial production is crucial in banks’ strategies regarding LLRs. Further, the S&P 500 has the most substantial impact on LLRs in a non-macroeconomic framework. Also, the results indicate that US banks are seeing a resurgence and are proactively allocating resources for their recovery. Overall, the findings of the study suggest that the financial institutions of the US ought to enhance their loan provisioning strategies in order to optimize resource allocation and improve the overall business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgia Zournatzidou & George Sklavos & Konstantina Ragazou & Nikolaos Sariannidis, 2025. "Investigating Factors Affecting Loan Loss Reserves in the US Financial Sector: A Dynamic Panel Regression Analysis with Fixed-Effects Models," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:105-:d:1593577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/2/105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valente, José & Augusto, Mário & Murteira, José, 2024. "Differentiated impact of spread determinants by personal loan category: Evidence from the Brazilian banking sector," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 299-315.
    2. Apergis, Nicholas, 2024. "The role of loan loss provisions in income inequality: Evidence from a sample of banking institutions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Timothy W. Koch & Larry D. Wall, 2000. "Bank loan-loss accounting: a review of theoretical and empirical evidence," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, vol. 85(Q2), pages 1-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozili, Peterson K, 2015. "Loan Loss Provisioning, Income Smoothing, Signaling, Capital Management and Procyclicality: Does IFRS Matter? Empirical Evidence from Nigeria," MPRA Paper 68350, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Iftekhar Hasan & Larry D. Wall, 2004. "Determinants of the Loan Loss Allowance: Some Cross‐Country Comparisons," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 39(1), pages 129-152, February.
    3. García Osma, Beatriz & Mora, Araceli & Porcuna-Enguix, Luis, 2019. "Prudential supervisors’ independence and income smoothing in European banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 156-176.
    4. Gabriel Jiménez & Jesús Saurina, 2006. "Credit Cycles, Credit Risk, and Prudential Regulation," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 2(2), May.
    5. Domikowsky, Christian & Bornemann, Sven & Duellmann, Klaus & Pfingsten, Andreas, 2014. "Loan loss provisioning and procyclicality: Evidence from an expected loss model," Discussion Papers 39/2014, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    6. Knaup, M. & Wagner, W.B., 2009. "A Market Based Measure of Credit Quality and Banks' Performance During the Subprime Crisis," Other publications TiSEM a6e8a0c8-00de-45b7-bb02-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Shen, Chung-Hua & Chen, Ting-Hsuan, 2010. "Estimating banking cost efficiency with the consideration of cost management," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 424-435, November.
    8. Jeffery W. Gunther & Robert R. Moore, 2000. "Financial statements and reality: do troubled banks tell all?," Economic and Financial Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, issue Q3, pages 30-35.
    9. Bandyopadhyay, Satiprasad & Jha, Ranjini & Kennedy, Duane, 2017. "The effect of the US subprime crisis on Canadian banks," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 58-74.
    10. Prateek Sharma, 2022. "Management quality, M-rating, and bank failures," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 1-32, February.
    11. Peterson K. Ozili & Erick Outa, 2017. "Bank loan loss provisions research: A review," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 17(3), pages 144-163, September.
    12. Mary E. Barth & Javier Gomez-Biscarri & Ron Kasznik & Germán López-Espinosa, 2017. "Bank earnings and regulatory capital management using available for sale securities," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1761-1792, December.
    13. Cavallo, Michele & Majnoni, Giovanni, 2001. "Do Banks provision for bad loans in good times? empirical evidence and policy implications," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2619, The World Bank.
    14. Gerard Caprio, 2011. "Safe and Sound Banking: A Role for Countercyclical Regulatory Requirements?," Chapters, in: Sylvester Eijffinger & Donato Masciandaro (ed.), Handbook of Central Banking, Financial Regulation and Supervision, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Apergis, Nicholas, 2024. "The role of loan loss provisions in income inequality: Evidence from a sample of banking institutions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. repec:zbw:safewh:awhitepaperseriesx30 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Balla, Eliana & Rose, Morgan J., 2015. "Loan loss provisions, accounting constraints, and bank ownership structure," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 92-117.
    18. Daniel Perez & Vicente Salas-Fumas & Jesus Saurina, 2008. "Earnings and Capital Management in Alternative Loan Loss Provision Regulatory Regimes," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 423-445.
    19. Sarah B. Stuber & Chris E. Hogan, 2021. "Do PCAOB Inspections Improve the Accuracy of Accounting Estimates?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 331-370, March.
    20. Eliana Balla & Andrew McKenna, 2009. "Dynamic provisioning: a countercyclical tool for loan loss reserves," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 95(Fall), pages 383-418.
    21. Claudio Borio & Craig Furfine & Philip Lowe, 2001. "Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: issues and policy options," BIS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Marrying the macro- and micro-prudential dimensions of financial stability, volume 1, pages 1-57, Bank for International Settlements.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:105-:d:1593577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.