IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i8p342-d1452200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Regimes, Stock Liquidity, and Information Asymmetry in a Global Context

Author

Listed:
  • Jang-Chul Kim

    (Department of Accounting, Economics, and Finance, Haile College of Business, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA)

  • Qing Su

    (Department of Accounting, Economics, and Finance, Haile College of Business, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA)

  • Teressa Elliott

    (Department of Accounting, Economics, and Finance, Haile College of Business, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA)

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between a country’s political governance and financial market dynamics, with a specific focus on non-U.S. stocks listed on the NYSE. Utilizing an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model with heteroscedasticity-robust (Huber–White) estimators, we analyze the impact of political governance on stock liquidity and information asymmetry. Our analysis shows that stocks from democracies demonstrate improved liquidity and decreased information asymmetry, contrasting with stocks from autocracies that exhibit the opposite trend. Furthermore, shifts in political regimes dynamically impact stock liquidity and information transparency. These findings offer essential insights for investors, policymakers, and regulators, contributing to informed decision making and the formulation of policies that promote market health and transparency. Additionally, these findings underscore the importance of promoting political stability and transparent governance to foster healthy and efficient financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Jang-Chul Kim & Qing Su & Teressa Elliott, 2024. "Political Regimes, Stock Liquidity, and Information Asymmetry in a Global Context," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:342-:d:1452200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/342/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/342/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Quan-Jing & Feng, Gen-Fu & Wang, Hai-Jie & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2021. "The impacts of democracy on innovation: Revisited evidence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Roll, Richard, 1984. "A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(4), pages 1127-1139, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Senn, Erik-Jan, 2020. "Measuring the Impact of MiFID II on Information Asymmetries Using Microstructure Models," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 5(2), pages 197-208.
    2. Lo, Andrew W & MacKinlay, A Craig, 1990. "When Are Contrarian Profits Due to Stock Market Overreaction?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 3(2), pages 175-205.
    3. Christopher L. Culp & Yoshio Nozawa & Pietro Veronesi, 2014. "Option-Based Credit Spreads," NBER Working Papers 20776, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Custódio, Cláudia & Ferreira, Miguel A. & Laureano, Luís, 2013. "Why are US firms using more short-term debt?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 182-212.
    5. Xuanjuan Chen & Jing-Zhi Huang & Zhenzhen Sun & Tong Yao & Tong Yu, 2020. "Liquidity Premium in the Eye of the Beholder: An Analysis of the Clientele Effect in the Corporate Bond Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 932-957, February.
    6. Goldstein, Itay & Jiang, Hao & Ng, David T., 2017. "Investor flows and fragility in corporate bond funds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 592-613.
    7. Gerhard, Frank & Hess, Dieter & Pohlmeier, Winfried, 1998. "What a Difference a Day Makes: On the Common Market Microstructure of Trading Days," CoFE Discussion Papers 98/01, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    8. Chen, Jiun-Lin & Jia, Z. Tingting & Sun, Ping-Wen, 2016. "Real option component of cash holdings, business cycle, and stock returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 97-106.
    9. Craig Pirrong, 1996. "Market liquidity and depth on computerized and open outcry trading systems: A comparison of DTB and LIFFE bund contracts," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(5), pages 519-543, August.
    10. Qiu, Jiaping & Yu, Fan, 2012. "Endogenous liquidity in credit derivatives," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(3), pages 611-631.
    11. Ulibarri, Carlos A. & Schatzberg, John, 2003. "Liquidity costs: Screen-based trading versus open outcry," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 381-396.
    12. Jamshed Y. Uppal, 2009. "The Role of Satellite Stock Exchanges: A Case Study of the Lahore Stock Exchange," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 1-47, Jul-Dec.
    13. Elaut, Gert & Frömmel, Michael & Lampaert, Kevin, 2018. "Intraday momentum in FX markets: Disentangling informed trading from liquidity provision," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 35-51.
    14. Dimitrakopoulos, Stefanos & Tsionas, Mike, 2019. "Ordinal-response GARCH models for transaction data: A forecasting exercise," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1273-1287.
    15. Flannery, Mark J. & Kwan, Simon H. & Nimalendran, Mahendrarajah, 2013. "The 2007–2009 financial crisis and bank opaqueness," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 55-84.
    16. Joseph, Andreas & Vasios, Michalis, 2022. "OTC Microstructure in a period of stress: A Multi-layered network approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Christiane Goodfellow & Martin T. Bohl, 2011. "Forestalling Floor Closure: Evidence from a Natural Experiment on the German Stock Market," Post-Print hal-00676103, HAL.
    18. Lof, Matthijs & van Bommel, Jos, 2023. "Asymmetric information and the distribution of trading volume," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Yeh, Jin-Huei & Chen, Lien-Chuan, 2014. "Stabilizing the market with short sale constraint? New evidence from price jump activities," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 238-246.
    20. Christensen, Kim & Oomen, Roel C.A. & Podolskij, Mark, 2014. "Fact or friction: Jumps at ultra high frequency," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 576-599.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:342-:d:1452200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.