IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i8p326-d1443940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Compliance: How ESG Reporting Influences the Cost of Capital in UK Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Saber Moussa

    (Customs Authority, Ministry of Finance Egypt, Nasr City 11635, Cairo, Egypt)

  • Mahmoud Elmarzouky

    (St Andrews Business School, University of St Andrews, The Gateway, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9RJ, UK)

Abstract

This research examines the effect of ESG disclosure on the cost of capital for non-financial firms in the UK, indexed by the FTSE All-Share Index, during the period from 2014 to 2018. Using multivariate analysis with ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects, robust regression, and Tobit models, this research assesses the effect of ESG reporting, governance, and the cost of capital, including robustness checks using an alternative ESG indicator, the environmental pillar score. Contrary to expectations, ESG reporting is positively associated with the cost of capital. However, corporate governance moderates this relationship, weakening the positive correlation and reversing it to a negative association for firms with strong governance practices, consistent with the hypotheses. This research also finds that firm size, liquidity, profitability, and leverage, positively affect the cost of capital, while board size, independent board composition, audit committee independence, and auditor type do not significantly influence it. Notably, non-executive directors on the audit committee have a significant negative effect on the cost of capital. These findings are valuable for investors, companies, regulators, auditors, policymakers, and the academic and research community. Specifically, for investors, this study provides insights into how ESG disclosures can influence investment risks and returns, highlighting the importance of robust corporate governance. Companies can leverage these insights to enhance their governance practices and optimize their capital costs. Regulators and policymakers can use the findings to develop guidelines that encourage transparent ESG reporting and strong governance frameworks, thereby improving market stability and investor confidence. Auditors can utilize the results to better understand the effect of non-financial reporting on financial metrics, helping to provide more accurate audits and assessments. These findings inform investors, companies, regulators, auditors, and academia, in fostering a more sustainable and transparent financial environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Saber Moussa & Mahmoud Elmarzouky, 2024. "Beyond Compliance: How ESG Reporting Influences the Cost of Capital in UK Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:326-:d:1443940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skinner, Dj, 1994. "Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad-News," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 38-60.
    2. Christine Mallin & Giovanna Michelon & Davide Raggi, 2013. "Monitoring Intensity and Stakeholders’ Orientation: How Does Governance Affect Social and Environmental Disclosure?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 29-43, April.
    3. Paul Gompers & Joy Ishii & Andrew Metrick, 2003. "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 107-156.
    4. Tsang, Albert & Frost, Tracie & Cao, Huijuan, 2023. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    5. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili, 2020. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure, Ownership Structure and Cost of Capital: Evidence from the UAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Dietmar Ernst & Florian Woithe, 2024. "Impact of the Environmental, Social, and Governance Rating on the Cost of Capital: Evidence from the S&P 500," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    8. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nopparat Wongsinhirun & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Pornsit Jiraporn & Piyachart Phiromswad, 2022. "Do takeover threats influence corporate social responsibility? Evidence from hostile takeover vulnerability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1203-1213, September.
    2. Gerry Gallery & Emerson Cooper & John Sweeting, 2008. "Corporate Disclosure Quality: Lessons from Australian Companies on the Impact of Adopting International Financial Reporting Standards," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(3), pages 257-273, September.
    3. Adi Masli & Matthew G. Sherwood & Rajendra P. Srivastava, 2018. "Attributes and Structure of an Effective Board of Directors: A Theoretical Investigation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(4), pages 485-523, December.
    4. Panagiotis Staikouras & Christos Staikouras & Maria-Eleni Agoraki, 2007. "The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-27, February.
    5. Alley Ibrahim S. & Adebayo Abimbola L. & Oligbi Blessing O., 2016. "Corporate Governance and Financial Performance Nexus: Any Bidirectional Causality?," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 50(1), pages 82-99, June.
    6. Jackie Krafft & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2008. "Corporate Governance in Advanced Economies: Lessons in a Post Financial Crash Era.. Introduction to the Special Issue," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 74(4), pages 419-424.
    7. Saha Rupjyoti & Kabra Kailash Chandra, 2019. "Does corporate governance influence firm performance? Evidence from India," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(4), pages 70-89, December.
    8. Volonté, Christophe, 2015. "Boards: Independent and committed directors?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 25-37.
    9. Nachane, D M & Ghosh, Saibal & Ray, Partha, 2005. "Bank nominee directors and corporate performance: micro evidence for India," MPRA Paper 1714, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Leo Vashkor Dewri, 2022. "A Critical Assessment of Interrelationship Among Corporate Governance, Financial Performance, Refined Economic Value Added to Measure Firm Value and Return on Stock," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 2718-2759, December.
    11. Attiya Y. Javid & Robina Iqbal, 2010. "Corporate Governance in Pakistan : Corporate Valuation, Ownership and Financing," Governance Working Papers 22830, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    12. Gompers, Paul & Kaplan, Steven N. & Mukharlyamov, Vladimir, 2016. "What do private equity firms say they do?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 449-476.
    13. Zeineb Barka & Taher Hamza, 2020. "The effect of large controlling shareholders on equity prices in France: monitoring or entrenchment?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 769-798, September.
    14. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    15. Lin, Zhijun & Song, Byron Y. & Tian, Zhimin, 2016. "Does director-level reputation matter? Evidence from bank loan contracting," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 160-176.
    16. James, Hui & Benson, Bradley W. & Wu, Chen (Ken), 2017. "Does CEO ownership affect payout policy? Evidence from using CEO scaled wealth-performance sensitivity," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 328-345.
    17. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Eri Nakamura, 2014. "Managerial incentive, organizational slack, and performance: empirical analysis of Japanese firms’ behavior," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 245-284, February.
    18. Guidi, Marco G.D. & Hillier, Joe & Tarbert, Heather, 2010. "Successfully reshaping the ownership relationship by reducing ‘moral debt’ and justly distributing residual claims: The cases from Scott Bader Commonwealth and the John Lewis Partnership," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 318-328.
    19. Ping Sun & Sheng Ma & Xinxin Xu, 2022. "Multi-Factor Collaborative Governance of Controlling Shareholder Expropriation Behavior in Emerging Economies: A Perspective of Double Principal-Agent Conflicts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    20. McKnight, Phillip J. & Weir, Charlie, 2009. "Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 139-158, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:326-:d:1443940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.