IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2023i1p5-d1304504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taxation Perspectives: Analyzing the Factors behind Viewing Taxes as Punishment—A Comprehensive Study of Taxes as Service or Strain

Author

Listed:
  • Hunar Mohammed

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly u. 1, 2100 Gödöllo, Hungary
    College of Law and Administration, International Trade, University of Halabja, Ababaile Village, Halabja 46018, Kurdistan Region, Iraq)

  • Anita Tangl

    (Department of Methodology for Business Analysis, Faculty of Commerce, Hospitality and Tourism, Budapest Business University, Alkotmány utca 9-11, 1054 Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

This research paper delves into the intricate relationship between taxpayers and taxation systems, seeking to understand the factors influencing individuals’ perceptions of taxes as either a service or a financial burden. The study employed online surveys to collect data from a diverse group of participants, using both quantitative and qualitative research methods. The research findings demonstrate that people’s perceptions of taxes are not solely shaped by economic factors but are also influenced by psychological aspects, government communication, and societal norms. In economically developed countries, citizens tend to have more positive tax perceptions due to the visible benefits of their tax contributions. In contrast, less developed nations often see negative perceptions rooted in the lack of apparent returns on taxes paid. Additionally, the fairness of tax policies and government communication significantly impact how taxes are perceived. This research provides insights for policymakers on how to enhance tax compliance and improve taxpayer–government relations. It suggests that progressive and fair tax policies can lead to higher compliance rates and increased revenue collection. Furthermore, simplifying tax systems and reducing bureaucratic obstacles can make tax compliance more accessible and less burdensome. The study also offers international case studies for best practices that can be adapted to different contexts. This study sheds light on the multifaceted nature of tax perceptions and their impact on economic behavior. It underscores the importance of considering both economic and psychological factors, as well as government policies and communication, in shaping taxpayers’ views on taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunar Mohammed & Anita Tangl, 2023. "Taxation Perspectives: Analyzing the Factors behind Viewing Taxes as Punishment—A Comprehensive Study of Taxes as Service or Strain," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:5-:d:1304504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/1/5/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/1/5/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Besley & Torsten Persson, 2014. "Why Do Developing Countries Tax So Little?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(4), pages 99-120, Fall.
    2. Sue Yong & Peni Fukofuka, 2023. "Accounting, tax compliance and New Zealand indigenous entrepreneurs: a Bourdieusian perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(5), pages 1350-1378, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Ling & Liu, Shasha & Kong, Dongmin, 2023. "Governments' fiscal stress and firm decentralization," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Samuel Brazys & Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati, 2021. "Aid curse with Chinese characteristics? Chinese development flows and economic reforms," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 407-430, September.
    3. Fuchs-Schündeln, Nicola & Bick, Alexander & Lagakos, David & Tsujiyama, Hitoshi, 2019. "Why are Average Hours Worked Lower in Richer Countries?," CEPR Discussion Papers 14180, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Ibale, Douglas Amuli & Docquier, Frédéric & Iftikhar, Zainab, 2024. "Spatial Inequality, Poverty and Informality in the Democratic Republic of the Congo," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Hummel, Albert Jan & Ziesemer, Vinzenz, 2023. "Food subsidies in general equilibrium," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Muhamad, Goran M. & Heshmati, Almas & Khayyat, Nabaz T., 2021. "How to reduce the degree of dependency on natural resources?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Henrik Jacobsen Kleven & Claus Thustrup Kreiner & Emmanuel Saez, 2016. "Why Can Modern Governments Tax So Much? An Agency Model of Firms as Fiscal Intermediaries," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 83(330), pages 219-246, April.
    8. Anda David & Yoro Diallo & Björn Nilsson, 2023. "Informality and Inequality: The African Case," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 32(Supplemen), pages 273-295.
    9. Bick, Alexander & Fuchs-Schündeln, Nicola & Lagakos, David & Tsujiyama, Hitoshi, 2022. "Structural change in labor supply and cross-country differences in hours worked," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 68-85.
    10. Hsiao, William C. & Yip, Winnie, 2024. "Financing and provision of healthcare for two billion people in low-income nations: Is the cooperative healthcare model a solution?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Keefer, Philip & Scartascini, Carlos & Vlaicu, Razvan, 2022. "Demand-side determinants of public spending allocations: Voter trust, risk and time preferences," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    12. Chen, Shawn Xiaoguang, 2017. "The effect of a fiscal squeeze on tax enforcement: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 62-76.
    13. Agus Bandiyono & Etty Murwaningsari, 2019. "Effect of Intra Group Transaction, Thin Capitalization and Executive Characters on Tax Avoidation with Multinationality as a Moderation," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 82-97.
    14. Ingela Alger & Laura Juarez & Miriam Juarez-Torres & Josepa Miquel-Florensa, 2023. "Do Women Contribute More Effort than Men to a Real Public Good?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 37(2), pages 205-220.
    15. Robin Burgess & Michael Greenstone & Nicholas Ryan & Anant Sudarshan, 2020. "The Consequences of Treating Electricity as a Right," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(1), pages 145-169, Winter.
    16. Haiwen Zhou, 2023. "State Capacity and Leadership: Why Did China Take off?," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1), pages 50-68, January.
    17. Andreas Freytag & Krige Siebrits, 2023. "Replacing customs revenue with taxes on income and domestic consumption: The South African experience," Jena Economics Research Papers 2023-013, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    18. Fabio Lamantia & Mario Pezzino & Fabio Tramontana, 2017. "Tax Evasion, Intrinsic Motivation, and the Evolutionary Effects of Tax Reforms," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1707, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    19. Kodjo Adandohoin, 2021. "Tax transition in developing countries: do value added tax and excises really work?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 379-424, May.
    20. Tom Moerenhout & Joonseok Yang, 2022. "Tax Evasion Attitudes of Small Firms in Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries: Evidence from Nigeria," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(6), November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:5-:d:1304504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.