IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i9p379-d1223578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determining the Appropriate Accounting Treatment of Cryptocurrencies Based on Accounting Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolette Klopper

    (School of Accountancy, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa)

  • Sophia Magaretha Brink

    (School of Accountancy, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa)

Abstract

The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) do not make explicit provisions, in terms of a specifically dedicated standard, for the accounting treatment of cryptocurrencies. This creates uncertainty, and guidance is therefore required in terms of accounting for such investments. Accounting theory has the potential to provide the foundation for this guidance. This study aimed to determine the most appropriate accounting treatment for cryptocurrencies based on the International Accounting Standards Board’s (IASB) Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (as a form of accounting theory) that results in decision-useful information. The research further investigated the proposed accounting treatment in terms of IFRS and sought to determine whether this treatment was aligned with the IASB’s conceptual framework. This qualitative study conducted a non-empirical interpretative analysis of the literature (focusing specifically on accounting theory) to address the research aim. The conceptual framework indicated that the most appropriate way to account for cryptocurrencies was to recognise an asset at fair value. This accounting treatment aligns with accounting for assets under International Accounting Standard (IAS) 2 commodities held by broker-traders and the IAS 38 revaluation model. Addressing the problem of accounting for cryptocurrencies with reference to accounting theory makes this study novel. The guidance provided could reduce uncertainty among entities holding investments in cryptocurrencies and could increase the decision-usefulness of financial information.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolette Klopper & Sophia Magaretha Brink, 2023. "Determining the Appropriate Accounting Treatment of Cryptocurrencies Based on Accounting Theory," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:379-:d:1223578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/9/379/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/9/379/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boon Seng Tan & Kin Yew Low, 2017. "Bitcoin – Its Economics for Financial Reporting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 27(2), pages 220-227, June.
    2. Tatiana Morozova & Ravil Akhmadeev & Liubov Lehoux & Alexei Valerievich Yumashev & Galina Vladimirovna Meshkova & Marina Lukiyanova, 2020. "Crypto asset assessment models in financial reporting content typologies," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2196-2212, March.
    3. Asheer Ram & Warren Maroun & Robert Garnett, 2016. "Accounting for the Bitcoin: accountability, neoliberalism and a correspondence analysis," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 2-35, April.
    4. repec:eme:marpps:10222529200800001 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ifigenia Georgiou & Svetlana Sapuric & Petros Lois & Alkis Thrassou, 2024. "Blockchain for Accounting and Auditing—Accounting and Auditing for Cryptocurrencies: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-43, July.
    2. Erica Pimentel & Emilio Boulianne, 2020. "Blockchain in Accounting Research and Practice: Current Trends and Future Opportunities," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 325-361, December.
    3. Parthajit Kayal & Purnima Rohilla, 2021. "Bitcoin in the economics and finance literature: a survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Maghyereh, Aktham & Abdoh, Hussein, 2021. "Time–frequency quantile dependence between Bitcoin and global equity markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Bouri, Elie & Roubaud, David & Kristoufek, Ladislav & Lucey, Brian, 2019. "Is Bitcoin a better safe-haven investment than gold and commodities?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 322-330.
    6. Alsalmi, Noora & Ullah, Subhan & Rafique, Muhammad, 2023. "Accounting for digital currencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. D. Larry Crumbley & Donald L. Ariail & Amine Khayati, 2023. "How Should Cryptocurrencies Be Defined and Reported? An Exploratory Study of Accounting Professor Opinions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Sundarasen Sheela & Ahnaf Ali Alsmady & K. Tanaraj & Ibrahim Izani, 2023. "Navigating the Future: Blockchain’s Impact on Accounting and Auditing Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Zapf, Anke, 2020. "Herausforderungen und Chancen bei der Bilanzierung von Kryptowährungen," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 5(2), pages 148-175.
    10. Zdravka Aljinović & Branka Marasović & Tea Šestanović, 2021. "Cryptocurrency Portfolio Selection—A Multicriteria Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Marco Bellucci & Damiano Cesa Bianchi & Giacomo Manetti, 2021. "A literature review on blockchain in accounting research," Working Papers - Business wp2021_04.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    12. Pattnaik, Debidutta & Hassan, M. Kabir & Dsouza, Arun & Tiwari, Aviral & Devji, Shridev, 2023. "Ex-post facto analysis of cryptocurrency literature over a decade using bibliometric technique," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Filip Hampl & Lucie Gyönyörová, 2021. "Can Fiat‐backed Stablecoins Be Considered Cash or Cash Equivalents Under International Financial Reporting Standards Rules?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 233-255, September.
    14. Cynthia W. Cai & Martina K. Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K. Singh, 2019. "Machine Learning and Expert Judgement: Analyzing Emerging Topics in Accounting and Finance Research in the Asia–Pacific," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 55(4), pages 709-733, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:9:p:379-:d:1223578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.