IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i10p420-d1245999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Financial Derivatives Market and the Pandemic: BioNTech and Moderna Volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Manelli

    (Department of Management, Polytechnic University of Marche, Piazzale Martelli 8, 60121 Ancona, Italy)

  • Roberta Pace

    (Department of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Mezzanotte, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Maria Leone

    (Department of Management, Polytechnic University of Marche, Piazzale Martelli 8, 60121 Ancona, Italy)

Abstract

Global society’s comfort and well-established certainties have been unpredictably and foundationally undermined by the emergence of the COVID-19 virus. The announcement of the pandemic by the WHO has halted global economic activities, and the financial markets have recorded drastic losses. In this context of uncertainty and economic downturn, many traditional companies have been negatively impacted, but the biotechnology sector, which has already been growing for some years, registered high growth rates and earnings. In particular, this study focused on the two most significant biotech companies, BioNTech and Moderna, the two start-ups that first commercialized COVID-19 vaccines. The GARCH (1,1) model examines the relation of two stock prices and the volatility of derivatives markets before and after the outbreak of the pandemic. The variables used in the analysis are the U.S. technologic market index, the market volatility, and Brent future prices. The results suggest a different reaction of market volatility and Brent future prices on the return of both companies. Additionally, during the COVID-19 period, a contagion effect between both companies and the technological market was observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Manelli & Roberta Pace & Maria Leone, 2023. "The Financial Derivatives Market and the Pandemic: BioNTech and Moderna Volatility," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:420-:d:1245999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/10/420/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/10/420/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akhtaruzzaman, Md & Boubaker, Sabri & Sensoy, Ahmet, 2021. "Financial contagion during COVID–19 crisis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    2. Paul Gompers & Josh Lerner, 2001. "The Venture Capital Revolution," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 145-168, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prelipcean, Gabriela & Boscoianu, Mircea, 2019. "Aspect Regarding the Design of Active Strategies for Venture Capital Financing – the Flexible Adjustment for Romania as a Frontier Capital Market," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2019), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 12-14 September 2019, pages 187-196, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    2. Yingkai Li & Boli Xu, 2024. "Information Acquisition Towards Unanimous Consent," Papers 2405.18521, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    3. Carolin Bock & Maximilian Schmidt, 2015. "Should I stay, or should I go? – How fund dynamics influence venture capital exit decisions," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 68-82, November.
    4. Mikaela Backman & Charlie Karlsson, 2016. "Determinants of self-employment among commuters and non-commuters," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 755-774, November.
    5. Gerard Llobet & Javier Suarez, 2010. "Entrepreneurial Innovation, Patent Protection and Industry Dynamics," Working Papers wp2010_1001, CEMFI.
    6. Demougin, Dominique M. & Fabel, Oliver, 2006. "The division of ownership in new ventures," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2006-047, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    7. Johannes Hörner & Larry Samuelson, 2013. "Incentives for experimenting agents," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 44(4), pages 632-663, December.
    8. Valérie Revest & Alessandro Sapio, 2012. "Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 179-205, July.
    9. Fabio Bertoni & María Ferrer & José Martí, 2013. "The different roles played by venture capital and private equity investors on the investment activity of their portfolio firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 607-633, April.
    10. Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat, 2010. "Commercialization strategies of technology: lessons from Silicon Valley," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 225-236, April.
    11. Laeven, Luc & Popov, Alexander, 2023. "Carbon taxes and the geography of fossil lending," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Valérie Revest & Alessandro Sapio, 2016. "Graduation and sell-out strategies in the Alternative Investment Market," Discussion Papers 4_2016, CRISEI, University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    13. Rodrigues Brás Gonçalo & Soukiazis Elias, 2019. "The Determinants of Entrepreneurship at the Country Level: A Panel Data Approach," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Ansgar Belke & Rainer Fehn & Neil Foster, 2001. "Venture Capital Investment and Labor Market Performance: A Panel Data Analysis," Diskussionspapiere aus dem Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre der Universität Hohenheim 197/2001, Department of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Germany.
    15. Y. Sekou Bermiss & Benjamin L. Hallen & Rory McDonald & Emily C. Pahnke, 2017. "Entrepreneurial beacons: The Yale endowment, run‐ups, and the growth of venture capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 545-565, March.
    16. Marcos Albuquerque Junior & José António Filipe & Paulo de Melo Jorge Neto & Cristiano da Costa da Silva, 2021. "Assessing the Time-Frequency Co-Movements among the Five Largest Engineering Consulting Companies: A Wavelet-Base Metrics of Contagion and VaR Ratio," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Hong Joo Lee, 2019. "What Factors Are Necessary for Sustaining Entrepreneurship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    18. Doris Kwon & Olav Sorenson, 2023. "The Silicon Valley Syndrome," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 344-368, March.
    19. M. Knockaert & T. Vanacker, 2011. "The Association between Venture Capitalists’ Selection and Value Adding Behavior: Evidence from Early Stage High Tech Venture Capitalists," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 11/741, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    20. Hamilton, Laura T. & Daniels, Heather & Smith, Christian Michael & Eaton, Charlie, 2022. "The Private Side of Public Universities: Third-party providers and platform capitalism," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt7p0114s8, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:10:p:420-:d:1245999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.