IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i11p536-d975804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Role of Personality Traits, Digital Technology Skills and Competency on the Effectiveness of Fraud Risk Assessment among External Auditors

Author

Listed:
  • Nurul Izzaty Mat Ridzuan

    (Q Homes Sdn Bhd, Shah Alam 40000, Malaysia)

  • Jamaliah Said

    (Accounting Research Institute, ARI HICoE, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia)

  • Fazlida Mohd Razali

    (Accounting Research Institute, ARI HICoE, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia)

  • Dewi Izzwi Abdul Manan

    (Faculty of Business, Accountancy and Social Science, Kolej Universiti Poly-Tech MARA, Cheras 56100, Malaysia)

  • Norhayati Sulaiman

    (Faculty of Business, Accountancy and Social Science, Kolej Universiti Poly-Tech MARA, Cheras 56100, Malaysia)

Abstract

In accordance with ISA 240, it is the responsibility of external auditors to obtain reasonable assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. Recently, the auditing profession in Malaysia has been significantly challenged by the explosion of fraud cases and by auditors’ failure to determine the “true and fair view” of the financial statement. This incident has tarnished the reputation of the audit profession. The effectiveness of the external auditor function, especially when related to fraud risk assessment, is commonly called into question. Hence, this study aims to assess individual factors (personality traits, digital technology skills, and competency) that may contribute to the effectiveness of fraud risk assessment among external auditors. A total of 455 questionnaires were distributed to external auditors, and a total of 150 (32.96%) responses were received. Data were thoroughly analyzed using Smart-PLS 4.0. This study found that digital technology skills contribute to the effectiveness of fraud risk assessment, whereas personality traits and competency do not. The findings implied that an effective technique of fraud risk assessment among external auditors requires digital technology skills. This study contributes to the literature by confirming the critical role of digital technology skills in enhancing the effectiveness of fraud risk assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurul Izzaty Mat Ridzuan & Jamaliah Said & Fazlida Mohd Razali & Dewi Izzwi Abdul Manan & Norhayati Sulaiman, 2022. "Examining the Role of Personality Traits, Digital Technology Skills and Competency on the Effectiveness of Fraud Risk Assessment among External Auditors," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:536-:d:975804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/11/536/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/11/536/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayek, F. A., 2012. "Hayek on Hayek," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226321202 edited by Kresge, Stephen & Wenar, Leif, December.
    2. Samagaio, António & Felício, Teresa, 2022. "The influence of the auditor’s personality in audit quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 794-807.
    3. Knapp, Carol A. & Knapp, Michael C., 2001. "The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 25-37, January.
    4. Nora Azima Noordin & Khaled Hussainey & Ahmad Faisal Hayek, 2022. "The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Audit Quality: An Analysis from the Perspectives of External Auditors in the UAE," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Ala'a Zuhair Mansour & Aidi Ahmi & Oluwatoyin Muse Johnson Popoola, 2020. "The Personality Factor of Conscientiousness on Skills Requirement and Fraud Risk Assessment Performance," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(2), pages 405-415, April.
    6. Inez G. F. Verwey & Stephen K. Asare, 2022. "The Joint Effect of Ethical Idealism and Trait Skepticism on Auditors’ Fraud Detection," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 381-395, March.
    7. Herron, Eddward T. & Cornell, Robert M., 2021. "Creativity amidst standardization: Is creativity related to auditors’ recognition of and responses to fraud risk cues?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 314-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ala'a Zuhair Mansour & Aidi Ahmi & Oluwatoyin Muse Johnson Popoola, 2021. "The Interaction Effect of Personality Factor on Capability and Competence Requirement," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. William R. Morgan, 2023. "Finance Must Be Defended: Cybernetics, Neoliberalism and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Jael, Paul, 2015. "Socialist Calculation and Market Socialism," MPRA Paper 64255, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Przemyslaw Zbierowski, 2015. "Positive Entrepreneurship: Antecedents and Outcomes of Entrepreneurship within Positive Organizational Scholarship (Przedsiebiorczosc pozytywna – przyczyny i rezultaty przedsiebiorczosci z zakresu poz," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 13(56), pages 38-54.
    5. Luippold, Benjamin L. & Kida, Thomas & Piercey, M. David & Smith, James F., 2015. "Managing audits to manage earnings: The impact of diversions on an auditor’s detection of earnings management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 39-54.
    6. Juan Manuel Ospina, 2019. "Economía para no economistas. Un regalo de la formación del pensamiento económico," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, number 136, August.
    7. Oluwatoyin Muse Johnson Popoola & Ayoib B Che-Ahmad & Rose Shamsiah Samsudin, 2015. "An empirical investigation of fraud risk assessment and knowledge requirement on fraud related problem representation in Nigeria," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(1), pages 78-97, July.
    8. Jo Michell, 2017. "Do Shadow Banks Create Money? ‘Financialisation’ and the Monetary Circuit," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 354-377, May.
    9. de Ayala, Amaia & Hoyos, David & Mariel, Petr, 2015. "Suitability of discrete choice experiments for landscape management under the European Landscape Convention," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 79-96.
    10. Giovanna Tranfo & Lidia Caporossi & Daniela Pigini & Silvia Capanna & Bruno Papaleo & Enrico Paci, 2018. "Temporal Trends of Urinary Phthalate Concentrations in Two Populations: Effects of REACH Authorization after Five Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Etienne Farvaque & Alexander Mihailov & Alireza Naghavi, 2018. "The Grand Experiment of Communism: Discovering the Trade-Off between Equality and Efficiency," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 174(4), pages 707-742, December.
    12. Vassiliades, C. & Savvides, A. & Buonomano, A., 2022. "Building integration of active solar energy systems for façades renovation in the urban fabric: Effects on the thermal comfort in outdoor public spaces in Naples and Thessaloniki," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 30-47.
    13. Ahmad Adeel & Bruno Notteboom & Ansar Yasar & Kris Scheerlinck & Jeroen Stevens, 2021. "Sustainable Streetscape and Built Environment Designs around BRT Stations: A Stated Choice Experiment Using 3D Visualizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Arnaud Z. Dragicevic, 2019. "Market Coordination Under Non-Equilibrium Dynamics," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 697-715, September.
    15. Taner Akan & Tim Solle, 2022. "Do macroeconomic and financial governance matter? Evidence from Germany, 1950–2019," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(4), pages 993-1045, October.
    16. Samih Azar & Ali Bolbol & Alexandre Mouradian, 2016. "Profitability of Banks in Lebanon: Some Theoretical and Empirical Results," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(7), pages 233-233, July.
    17. Ferlito, Carmelo, 2015. "Ludwig M. Lachmann contro la Scuola di Cambridge [Ludwig M. Lachmann against the Cambridge School]," MPRA Paper 67759, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Octavian-Dragomir JORA & Alexandru BUTISEACÃ & Mihaela IACOB, 2017. "Seeking Truth from Facts and Figures Only? The Logic of Economics and China’s Miracles," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(5), pages 545-562, December.
    19. Kienast, Felix & Frick, Jacqueline & van Strien, Maarten J. & Hunziker, Marcel, 2015. "The Swiss Landscape Monitoring Program – A comprehensive indicator set to measure landscape change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 136-150.
    20. Chen, Qiu & Kelly, Khim & Salterio, Steven E., 2012. "Do changes in audit actions and attitudes consistent with increased auditor scepticism deter aggressive earnings management? An experimental investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 95-115.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:536-:d:975804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.