IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i9p406-d624104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock Split Rule Changes and Stock Liquidity: Evidence from Bursa Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • S. Amir Tabibian

    (School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)

  • Zhaoyong Zhang

    (School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)

  • Abdollah Ah Mand

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Selangor 47500, Malaysia)

Abstract

We test the impact of stock split rule changes on liquidity behavior in Bursa Malaysia during 2004–2020. Using event study methodology, this study examines stock liquidity on and around stock split days through three subperiods of study, including the first (2004–2006), second (2007–2009), and third (2010–2020) period. We find that liquidity improvement is short-lived in the first and second periods, while it is a long-lived phenomenon in the third period. Firms in the first and second period experienced liquidity improvement only on the split announcement day, while it lasts up to a year after the Ex-date for firms in the third period. Our findings also show a liquidity improvement after the Ex-date only in the third period for the groups of firms categorized based on the liquidity, split factor, and other simultaneous announcements. The findings suggest a positive effect of stock split rule changes implemented by the Securities Commission.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Amir Tabibian & Zhaoyong Zhang & Abdollah Ah Mand, 2021. "Stock Split Rule Changes and Stock Liquidity: Evidence from Bursa Malaysia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:406-:d:624104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/9/406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/9/406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William T. Chittenden & Janet D. Payne & J. Holland Toles, 2010. "A Note on Affordability and the Optimal Share Price," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 45(1), pages 205-216, February.
    2. Chen, Yong & Kelly, Bryan & Wu, Wei, 2020. "Sophisticated investors and market efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 316-341.
    3. Copeland, Thomas E, 1979. "Liquidity Changes Following Stock Splits," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 34(1), pages 115-141, March.
    4. Jiang, Jinjin & Li, Haiqi, 2020. "A new measure for market efficiency and its application," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    5. Irwin Friend & Edward S. Herman, 1964. "The S.E.C. Through a Glass Darkly," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37, pages 382-382.
    6. Stoian, Andreea & Iorgulescu, Filip, 2020. "Fiscal policy and stock market efficiency: An ARDL Bounds Testing approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 406-416.
    7. Brennan, Michael J. & Copeland, Thomas E., 1988. "Stock splits, stock prices, and transaction costs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 83-101, October.
    8. Dermot P. Murphy & Ramabhadran S. Thirumalai, 2017. "Short†Term Return Predictability And Repetitive Institutional Net Order Activity," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 40(4), pages 455-477, December.
    9. Yakov Amihud & Haim Mendelson, 2012. "Liquidity, the Value of the Firm, and Corporate Finance," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 24(1), pages 17-32, March.
    10. Garner, Steve A. & Hutchison, Paul D. & Conover, Teresa L., 2017. "Economic consequences of SEC regulation pertaining to financial expert definition," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 75-86.
    11. S. Amir Tabibian & Zhaoyong Zhang & Mohsen Jafarian, 2020. "How Does Split Announcement Affect Stock Liquidity? Evidence from Bursa Malaysia," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Lakonishok, Josef & Lev, Baruch, 1987. "Stock Splits and Stock Dividends: Why, Who, and When," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(4), pages 913-932, September.
    13. Patrick Dennis, 2003. "Stock Splits and Liquidity: The Case of the Nasdaq‐100 Index Tracking Stock," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 38(3), pages 415-433, August.
    14. Keith Jakob & Ryan Whitby, 2017. "The impact of nominal stock price on ex-dividend price responses," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 939-953, May.
    15. Eleswarapu, Venkat R. & Thompson, Rex & Venkataraman, Kumar, 2004. "The Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure: Trading Costs and Information Asymmetry," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 209-225, June.
    16. McNichols, Maureen & Dravid, Ajay, 1990. "Stock Dividends, Stock Splits, and Signaling," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(3), pages 857-879, July.
    17. Hu, May & Chao, Chi-Chur & Malone, Chris & Young, Martin, 2017. "Real determinants of stock split announcements," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 574-598.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Amir Tabibian & Zhaoyong Zhang & Mohsen Jafarian, 2020. "How Does Split Announcement Affect Stock Liquidity? Evidence from Bursa Malaysia," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Li Eng & Joohyung Ha & Sandeep Nabar, 2014. "The impact of regulation FD on the information environment: evidence from the stock market response to stock split announcements," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 829-853, November.
    3. Gow-Cheng Huang & Kartono Liano & Ming-Shiun Pan, 2015. "The effects of stock splits on stock liquidity," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 39(1), pages 119-135, January.
    4. Iannino, Maria Chiara & Zhang, Min & Zhuk, Sergey, 2024. "Signaling through timing of stock splits," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Nihat Gumus & Ayse Caglayan Gumus, 2021. "Do stock splits matter for returns, volatility, and liquidity? New Evidence from Borsa Istanbul," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 467-478, June.
    6. Gow-Cheng Huang & Kartono Liano & Ming-Shiun Pan, 2011. "REIT Stock Splits and Liquidity Changes," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 527-547, November.
    7. Leledakis, George N. & Papaioannou, George J. & Travlos, Nickolaos G. & Tsangarakis, Nickolaos V., 2009. "Stock splits in a neutral transaction cost environment: Evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 12-25, February.
    8. Ravi Dhar & William Goetzmann & Ning Zhu & EFA Moscow, 2004. "The Impact of Clientele Changes: Evidence from Stock Splits," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm369, Yale School of Management, revised 01 Sep 2009.
    9. Sunil Mohanty & Doocheol Moon, 2007. "Disentangling the signalling and liquidity effects of stock splits," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(12), pages 979-987.
    10. Gary E. Powell & H. Kent Baker, 1993. "The Effects Of Stock Splits On The Ownership Mix Of A Firm," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 70-88, September.
    11. Yagüe, José & Gómez-Sala, J. Carlos & Poveda-Fuentes, Francisco, 2009. "Stock split size, signaling and earnings management: Evidence from the Spanish market," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 31-47.
    12. Erik Devos & William B. Elliott & Richard S. Warr, 2018. "The Propensity to Split and CEO Compensation," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(1), pages 105-129, March.
    13. Pilotte, Eugene & Manuel, Timothy, 1996. "The market's response to recurring events The case of stock splits," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 111-127, May.
    14. Lin, Ji-Chai & Singh, Ajai K. & Yu, Wen, 2009. "Stock splits, trading continuity, and the cost of equity capital," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 474-489, September.
    15. Maria Chiara Iannino & Sergey Zhuk, 2020. "Signaling through Timing of Stock Splits," Discussion Paper Series, School of Economics and Finance 202009, School of Economics and Finance, University of St Andrews, revised 18 Jun 2021.
    16. Gow-Cheng Huang & Kartono Liano & Ming-Shiun Pan, 2006. "Do stock splits signal future profitability?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 347-367, June.
    17. Juan Carlos Gómez-Sala, 2001. "Rentabilidad y liquidez alrededor de la fecha de desdoblamiento de las acciones," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 25(1), pages 171-202, January.
    18. Guo, Fang & Zhou, Kaiguo & Cai, Jinghan, 2008. "Stock splits, liquidity, and information asymmetry--An empirical study on Tokyo Stock Exchange," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 417-438, September.
    19. Louis, Henock & Robinson, Dahlia, 2005. "Do managers credibly use accruals to signal private information? Evidence from the pricing of discretionary accruals around stock splits," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 361-380, June.
    20. Wulff, Christian, 1999. "The market reaction to stock splits: Evidence from Germany," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1999,42, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:406-:d:624104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.