IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i2p65-d493042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Inventory Holding Cost Due to Price, Weight, and Volume of Items

Author

Listed:
  • Amulya Gurtu

    (Austin E. Cofrin School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, WI 54311, USA)

Abstract

The inventory carrying cost has been assumed uniform for all products in an organization or a warehouse. This assumption is not valid for a diversified range of items in an organization or warehouse. This paper tested this hypothesis of variations in inventory holding costs in a warehouse in two industries based on the physical nature and the price of products. It is found that organizations with a wide variety of products need to calculate the inventory holding cost for each item (SKU) rather than using an average percentage cost of inventory. Inventory holding costs of items in two different organizations were calculated based on the various factors, including the actual cost of space due to the voluminous nature of the items with their existing inventory policies. A variation in inventory holding costs for each item was observed. The variation was small for an organization with homogeneous input costs, and it was large for a multi-product organization. The overall savings in the inventory holding cost due to adjusting the inventory policies through this methodology was found to be about 3%, which is significant for a big organization. This analysis will affect the decision the determining inventory carrying cost, inventory policies (e.g., stocking levels), and pricing policies (e.g., quantity discounts) for retail organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Amulya Gurtu, 2021. "Optimization of Inventory Holding Cost Due to Price, Weight, and Volume of Items," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:65-:d:493042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/2/65/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/2/65/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiawei Zhang, 2009. "Cost Allocation for Joint Replenishment Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 146-156, February.
    2. Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-153.
    3. Amulya Gurtu & Cory Searcy & M.Y. Jaber, 2017. "Emissions from international transport in global supply chains," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 53-74, January.
    4. Choi, Sangjin & Enns, S. T., 2004. "Multi-product capacity-constrained lot sizing with economic objectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 47-62, September.
    5. Gaurav Nagpal & Udayan Chanda, 2021. "Economic order quantity model for two generation consecutive technology products under permissible delay in payments," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 93-125.
    6. Wen Chen & Qi Feng & Sridhar Seshadri, 2015. "Inventory-Based Dynamic Pricing with Costly Price Adjustment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(5), pages 732-749, May.
    7. Perera, Sandun & Janakiraman, Ganesh & Niu, Shun-Chen, 2017. "Optimality of (s, S) policies in EOQ models with general cost structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 216-228.
    8. Wahab, M.I.M. & Mamun, S.M.H. & Ongkunaruk, P., 2011. "EOQ models for a coordinated two-level international supply chain considering imperfect items and environmental impact," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 151-158, November.
    9. Dobson, Gregory & Pinker, Edieal J. & Yildiz, Ozlem, 2017. "An EOQ model for perishable goods with age-dependent demand rate," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 84-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianwen Chen & Changqing Liu & Xiang Xu, 2022. "Coordination of Perishable Product Supply Chains with a Joint Contract under Yield and Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Mohammed Alnahhal & Batin Latif Aylak & Muataz Al Hazza & Ahmad Sakhrieh, 2024. "Economic Order Quantity: A State-of-the-Art in the Era of Uncertain Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Battini, Daria & Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2017. "Reprint of “Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 32-42.
    2. Mukunda Choudhury & Sujit Kumar De & Gour Chandra Mahata, 2023. "A pollution-sensitive multistage production-inventory model for deteriorating items considering expiration date under Stackelberg game approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11847-11884, October.
    3. Noura Yassine, 2020. "A sustainable economic production model: effects of quality and emissions tax from transportation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 73-94, July.
    4. Wu, Peng & Jin, Ying & Shi, Yongjiang & Shyu, Hawfeng, 2017. "The impact of carbon emission costs on manufacturers' production and location decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 193-206.
    5. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2015. "Haulage sharing approach to achieve sustainability in material purchasing: New method and numerical applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 308-318.
    6. Vahid Reza Soleymanfar & Ahmad Makui & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2022. "Sustainable EOQ and EPQ models for a two-echelon multi-product supply chain with return policy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5317-5343, April.
    7. Mohammed Alnahhal & Batin Latif Aylak & Muataz Al Hazza & Ahmad Sakhrieh, 2024. "Economic Order Quantity: A State-of-the-Art in the Era of Uncertain Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Hovelaque, Vincent & Bironneau, Laurent, 2015. "The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 285-291.
    9. Soon-Kyo Lee & Seung Ho Yoo & Taesu Cheong, 2017. "Sustainable EOQ under Lead-Time Uncertainty and Multi-Modal Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Grubbström, Robert W. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A century of evolution from Harris׳s basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 16-38.
    11. Schaefer, Brian & Konur, Dinçer, 2015. "Economic and environmental considerations in a continuous review inventory control system with integrated transportation decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 142-165.
    12. McDonald, Conor M., 2016. "Integrating packaging and supply chain decisions: Selection of economic handling unit quantities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 208-221.
    13. Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-153.
    14. Simai He & Jay Sethuraman & Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2017. "A NonCooperative Approach to Cost Allocation in Joint Replenishment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1562-1573, December.
    15. Ying‐Ju Chen & Leon Yang Chu, 2020. "Synchronizing pricing and replenishment to serve forward‐looking customers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(5), pages 321-333, August.
    16. Padilla Tinoco, Silvia Valeria & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2017. "Collaborative shipping under different cost-sharing agreements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 827-837.
    17. Yi Zheng & Huchang Liao & Xue Yang, 2016. "Stochastic Pricing and Order Model with Transportation Mode Selection for Low-Carbon Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Hauck, Zsuzsanna & Rabta, Boualem & Reiner, Gerald, 2023. "Coordinating quality decisions in a two-stage supply chain under buyer dominance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    19. Wu, Jiang & Chang, Chun-Tao & Teng, Jinn-Tsair & Lai, Kuei-Kuei, 2017. "Optimal order quantity and selling price over a product life cycle with deterioration rate linked to expiration date," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 343-351.
    20. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:65-:d:493042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.