IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i12p619-d706412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hidden Supply Chain Risk and Incoterms ® : Analysis and Mitigation Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Davis

    (GMSC Department, Marilyn Davies College of Business, The University of Houston Downtown, Houston, TX 77002, USA)

  • John Vogt

    (GMSC Department, Marilyn Davies College of Business, The University of Houston Downtown, Houston, TX 77002, USA)

Abstract

Among the many sources of financial and operational risk in supply chains are the Incoterms ® , which are terms of trade used to decide who does what in a cargo movement, when risk passes from seller to buyer and who pays for which part of the movement. Wrong Incoterms ® create unexpected costs or risks, at best, and inoperable contracts at worst, with all the challenges implied. This paper analyzes risk in supply chain management (SCM) through the lens of the responsibilities and costs imposed by Incoterms ® . The authors also conducted a survey of 100 supply chain decision makers on supply chain contracts creation and Incoterms ® knowledge in the population. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of Incoterms ® reveals many scenarios that pose financial, operational, and even legal risk to firms. Results suggest Incoterms ® rules are poorly understood by supply chain practitioners in general, are often chosen by personnel who are not aware of the implications of their choices, and are therefore frequently chosen incorrectly or non-strategically, thereby increasing cost and risk. This paper discusses the implications of the analysis and survey results on supply chain performance as well as mitigation strategies for practitioners in strategically using Incoterms ® to remove cost, risk, and delay from supply chain transactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Davis & John Vogt, 2021. "Hidden Supply Chain Risk and Incoterms ® : Analysis and Mitigation Strategies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:619-:d:706412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/12/619/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/12/619/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandridis, George & Kavussanos, Manolis G. & Kim, Chi Y. & Tsouknidis, Dimitris A. & Visvikis, Ilias D., 2018. "A survey of shipping finance research: Setting the future research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 164-212.
    2. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching, 2019. "A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 173-183.
    3. Liu, Hu-Chen & You, Jian-Xin & Duan, Chun-Yan, 2019. "An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 163-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Sun, Xiaolei & Liu, Chang & Wang, Jun & Li, Jianping, 2020. "Assessing the extreme risk spillovers of international commodities on maritime markets: A GARCH-Copula-CoVaR approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Failure mode and effect analysis considering the fairness-oriented consensus of a large group with core-periphery structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Hua Shi & Lin Huang & Ke Li & Xiang-Hu Wang & Hu-Chen Liu, 2022. "An Extended Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Method for Emergency Decision Making with Complex Linguistic Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Zhou, Jing & Liu, Yu & Liang, Decui & Tang, Maochun, 2023. "A new risk analysis approach to seek best production action during new product introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Khan, Ashraf & Goodell, John W. & Hassan, M. Kabir & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2022. "A bibliometric review of finance bibliometric papers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    7. Gavriilidis, Konstantinos & Kambouroudis, Dimos S. & Tsakou, Katerina & Tsouknidis, Dimitris A., 2018. "Volatility forecasting across tanker freight rates: The role of oil price shocks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 376-391.
    8. Sunil K. Mohanty & Roar Aadland & Sjur Westgaard & Stein Frydenberg & Hilde Lillienskiold & Cecilie Kristensen, 2021. "Modelling Stock Returns and Risk Management in the Shipping Industry," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Kian-Guan Lim & Michelle Lim, 2020. "Financial performance of shipping firms that increase LNG carriers and the support of eco-innovation," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2020. "A new soft computing approach for analyzing the influential relationships of critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    11. Ranka Gojković & Goran Đurić & Danijela Tadić & Snežana Nestić & Aleksandar Aleksić, 2021. "Evaluation and Selection of the Quality Methods for Manufacturing Process Reliability Improvement—Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Genetic Algorithm Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Andrikopoulos, Andreas & Merika, Anna & Merikas, Andreas & Sigalas, Christos, 2021. "Related party transactions and principal-principal conflicts in public companies: Evidence from the maritime shipping industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Sarbast Moslem & Muhammet Gul & Danish Farooq & Erkan Celik & Omid Ghorbanzadeh & Thomas Blaschke, 2020. "An Integrated Approach of Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Triangular Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Driver Behavior Factors Related to Road Safety," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Bai, Xiwen & Zhang, Xiunian & Li, Kevin X. & Zhou, Yaoming & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Research topics and trends in the maritime transport: A structural topic model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 11-24.
    15. Huang, Jia & You, Jian-Xin & Liu, Hu-Chen & Song, Ming-Shun, 2020. "Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Drobetz, Wolfgang & Ehlert, Sebastian & Schröder, Henning, 2021. "Institutional ownership and firm performance in the global shipping industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Zhang, Daihui & Qu, Zhuohau & Wang, Wenxin & Yu, Jiagen & Yang, Zaili, 2020. "New uncertainty modelling for cargo stowage plans of general cargo ships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    18. Pouliasis, Panos K. & Papapostolou, Nikos C. & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Visvikis, Ilias D., 2018. "Shipping equity risk behavior and portfolio management," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 178-200.
    19. Sun, Xiaolin & Haralambides, Hercules & Liu, Hailong, 2019. "Dynamic spillover effects among derivative markets in tanker shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 384-409.
    20. Arthur J. Lin & Hai-Yen Chang & Brian Hung, 2022. "Identifying Key Financial, Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG), Bond, and COVID-19 Factors Affecting Global Shipping Companies—A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:619-:d:706412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.