IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjopen/v8y2025i1p4-d1567254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plant Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning: A Multi-Dataset Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Manjunatha Shettigere Krishna

    (Department of Computer Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK)

  • Pedro Machado

    (Department of Computer Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK)

  • Richard I. Otuka

    (Department of Computer Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK)

  • Salisu W. Yahaya

    (Department of Computer Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK)

  • Filipe Neves dos Santos

    (INESC TEC, Campus da FEUP, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Isibor Kennedy Ihianle

    (Department of Computer Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, UK)

Abstract

Agricultural productivity is increasingly threatened by plant diseases, which can spread rapidly and lead to significant crop losses if not identified early. Detecting plant diseases accurately in diverse and uncontrolled environments remains challenging, as most current detection methods rely heavily on lab-captured images that may not generalise well to real-world settings. This paper aims to develop models capable of accurately identifying plant diseases across diverse conditions, overcoming the limitations of existing methods. A combined dataset was utilised, incorporating the PlantDoc dataset with web-sourced images of plants from online platforms. State-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, including EfficientNet-B0, EfficientNet-B3, ResNet50, and DenseNet201, were employed and fine-tuned for plant leaf disease classification. A key contribution of this work is the application of enhanced data augmentation techniques, such as adding Gaussian noise, to improve model generalisation. The results demonstrated varied performance across the datasets. When trained and tested on the PlantDoc dataset, EfficientNet-B3 achieved an accuracy of 73.31%. In cross-dataset evaluation, where the model was trained on PlantDoc and tested on a web-sourced dataset, EfficientNet-B3 reached 76.77% accuracy. The best performance was achieved with the combination of the PlanDoc and web-sourced datasets resulting in an accuracy of 80.19% indicating very good generalisation in diverse conditions. Class-wise F1-scores consistently exceeded 90% for diseases such as apple rust leaf and grape leaf across all models, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach for plant disease detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Manjunatha Shettigere Krishna & Pedro Machado & Richard I. Otuka & Salisu W. Yahaya & Filipe Neves dos Santos & Isibor Kennedy Ihianle, 2025. "Plant Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning: A Multi-Dataset Approach," J, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:4-:d:1567254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/8/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/8/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bulent Tugrul & Elhoucine Elfatimi & Recep Eryigit, 2022. "Convolutional Neural Networks in Detection of Plant Leaf Diseases: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamna Waheed & Waseem Akram & Saif ul Islam & Abdul Hadi & Jalil Boudjadar & Noureen Zafar, 2023. "A Mobile-Based System for Detecting Ginger Leaf Disorders Using Deep Learning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Jie Ding & Cheng Zhang & Xi Cheng & Yi Yue & Guohua Fan & Yunzhi Wu & Youhua Zhang, 2023. "Method for Classifying Apple Leaf Diseases Based on Dual Attention and Multi-Scale Feature Extraction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Patryk Hara & Magdalena Piekutowska & Gniewko NiedbaƂa, 2023. "Prediction of Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) Seeds Yield Using Artificial Neural Networks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Sadaf Zeeshan & Tauseef Aized & Fahid Riaz, 2023. "The Design and Evaluation of an Orange-Fruit Detection Model in a Dynamic Environment Using a Convolutional Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Sambandh Bhusan Dhal & Debashish Kar, 2024. "Transforming Agricultural Productivity with AI-Driven Forecasting: Innovations in Food Security and Supply Chain Optimization," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjopen:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:4-:d:1567254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.