IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i1p21-d1583237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Adoption on the Quality of Financial Reports on the Saudi Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulkarim Hamdan J. Alhazmi

    (Institute for Sustainable Industries & Liveable Cities (ISILC), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
    Department of Administrative Sciences, College of Applied Sciences, Northern Border University, Arar 91431, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sardar M. N. Islam

    (Institute for Sustainable Industries & Liveable Cities (ISILC), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Maria Prokofieva

    (College of Business, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore how artificial intelligence (AI) impacts the quality of financial reporting, providing insights into new opportunities in this field for the Saudi context. This study employed the UTAUT theory to examine the adoption of AI technology in auditing practices. This study also utilized bibliometric analysis techniques through an academic literature review and content analyses of the documentary evidence. The implication of this study is that non-Big 4 audit firms should adopt AI-powered drones, which consequently enhance decision making, decrease audit fees, and enhance the quality of financial reports, and the efficiency and accuracy of audits. Furthermore, this paper recommends that non-Big 4 audit firms adopting AI should foster a culture of change to ensure quality audits and consistency, overcome resistance to the change, and support the integration of technologies such as AI-driven audit automation. Our study also indicated the importance of integrating AI with the IFRS, developing a new framework for AI in auditing practices, incorporating AI into auditing courses, and modernizing auditing using AI. These implications lead to financial reports of enhanced quality. The results indicated four clusters, with artificial intelligence being the most significant keyword occurrence. This study has limitations, such as the lack of consideration of cyber-attack risks on drones, which may reduce the reliability of financial reports. Based on the findings of this research, audit companies and regulatory agencies in Saudi Arabia, like the Saudi Capital Market Authority (CMA), may evaluate the integration of AI to improve the quality of financial reporting. Implementing AI is expected to enhance the quality of audits, automate reporting, and support regulatory compliance to foster confidence and transparency in the financial industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulkarim Hamdan J. Alhazmi & Sardar M. N. Islam & Maria Prokofieva, 2025. "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Adoption on the Quality of Financial Reports on the Saudi Stock Exchange," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-38, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:21-:d:1583237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/1/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/1/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin P. Commerford & Sean A. Dennis & Jennifer R. Joe & Jenny W. Ulla, 2022. "Man Versus Machine: Complex Estimates and Auditor Reliance on Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 171-201, March.
    2. Nora Azima Noordin & Khaled Hussainey & Ahmad Faisal Hayek, 2022. "The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Audit Quality: An Analysis from the Perspectives of External Auditors in the UAE," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Ivy Munoko & Helen L. Brown-Liburd & Miklos Vasarhelyi, 2020. "The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 209-234, November.
    4. Kevin W. Boyack & Richard Klavans & Katy Börner, 2005. "Mapping the backbone of science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 64(3), pages 351-374, August.
    5. Pomerol, Jean-Charles, 1997. "Artificial intelligence and human decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 3-25, May.
    6. Francesca Bartolacci & Andrea Caputo & Michela Soverchia, 2020. "Sustainability and financial performance of small and medium sized enterprises: A bibliometric and systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1297-1309, March.
    7. Vitali, Sonia & Giuliani, Marco, 2024. "Emerging digital technologies and auditing firms: Opportunities and challenges," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Delia DELIU, 2024. "Professional Judgment and Skepticism Amidst the Interaction of Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 22(176), pages 724-741, October.
    2. Peters, Christian P. H., 2023. "The microfoundations of audit quality," Other publications TiSEM 6a2b12a5-6060-4544-883b-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Muhammad Khairuldin Al Hafiz Ismail & Wan Ahmad Aqief Muhaideen Ahmad Rajiun & Saidatul Shahnaz Binti Mustapa Kamal & Nurin Irdina Azmidal & Nurfatihah Izzati Sharul Nizam & Nur Danisha Iman Mohammad , 2024. "AI-Powered Internal Auditing: Transforming the Profession for a New Era," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(10), pages 2406-2413, October.
    4. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 525-550, June.
    5. Citron, Daniel T. & Way, Samuel F., 2018. "Network assembly of scientific communities of varying size and specificity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 181-190.
    6. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo & Flavia Costa, 2012. "Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(11), pages 2206-2222, November.
    7. Jianhua Hou, 2017. "Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1437-1452, March.
    8. Adrian GROȘANU & Melinda-Timea FÜLÖP & Nicolae MĂGDAȘ, 2024. "Ethical Dilemmas in Digital Accounting: A Comprehensive Literature Review," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(4), pages 56-67, April.
    9. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2009. "How to Normalize Co-Occurrence Data? An Analysis of Some Well-Known Similarity Measures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Ballantine, Joan & Boyce, Gordon & Stoner, Greg, 2024. "A critical review of AI in accounting education: Threat and opportunity," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Zhang, Chanyuan (Abigail) & Cho, Soohyun & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2022. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    12. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    13. Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio & Ruiz-Castillo, Javier, 2017. "A comparison of the Web of Science and publication-level classification systems of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 32-45.
    14. Jimi Adams & Ryan Light, 2014. "Mapping Interdisciplinary Fields: Efficiencies, Gaps and Redundancies in HIV/AIDS Research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez & J. A. García & J. Fdez-Valdivia, 2014. "Evolutionary games between subject categories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 869-888, October.
    16. Amin Mazloumian, 2012. "Predicting Scholars' Scientific Impact," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-5, November.
    17. Chen, Xiaoyan & Liu, Yisheng, 2020. "Visualization analysis of high-speed railway research based on CiteSpace," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-17.
    18. Radu USZKAI & Cristina VOINEA & Toni GIBEA, 2021. "Responsibility Attribution Problems In Companies: Could An Artificial Moral Advisor Solve This?," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 951-959, November.
    19. Vladimir A. Masch, 2017. "¡°Shifting the Paradigm¡± in Superintelligence," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 8, pages 17-30, May.
    20. Kiran, Madiha & Chughtai, Sumayya & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr, 2024. "Navigating greenwashing in the G8: Insights into family-owned firms, technology innovation, and economic policy uncertainty," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:21-:d:1583237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.