IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v12y2024i3p65-d1427648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Bangladesh Equity Market Expose to Disposition Effects Bias under Different Market Conditions?

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Enamul Haque

    (School of Business and Economics, United International University, Madani Avenue, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh)

  • Mahmood Osman Imam

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Business Studies, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

Abstract

The study provides an intuitive investigation into the disposition effect within frontier markets such as Bangladesh, particularly focusing on its behavior during various market conditions. The study’s novelty lies in its application of a methodological framework of the disposition effect measure of Weber and Camerer, aiming to understand the disposition effect through different market conditions. Dow Theory is applied to disparate bullish and bearish intermediate periods. Disposition effects persist for the entire study period, as well as the different market conditions except for the bearish Bangladesh equity market. The bullish and crisis markets exhibit a rather high disposition effect due to their respective market volatility. Stronger disposition effects are more pronounced for a crisis market in relation to a bullish market. In addition, the disposition effect in Bangladesh’s equity market oscillates in crisis periods. The documentation of the disposition effect in the Bangladesh equity market across market conditions suggests that investors’ psychology plays a crucial role in their decision processes. Individuals and professional investors should carefully design an appropriate strategy to control their decision-making process since the presence of disposition effects may impair the risk-return payoffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Enamul Haque & Mahmood Osman Imam, 2024. "Does the Bangladesh Equity Market Expose to Disposition Effects Bias under Different Market Conditions?," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:65-:d:1427648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/3/65/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/12/3/65/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdullah Alqahtani & Michael J. Wither & Zhankui Dong & Kimberly R. Goodwin, 2020. "Impact of news-based equity market volatility on international stock markets," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 224-234, January.
    2. Kathryn Kadous & William B. Tayler & Jane M. Thayer & Donald Young, 2014. "Individual Characteristics and the Disposition Effect: The Opposing Effects of Confidence and Self-Regard," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 235-250, July.
    3. Ahn, Yongkil, 2022. "The anatomy of the disposition effect: Which factors are most important?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ormos, Mihály & Timotity, Dusán, 2016. "Market microstructure during financial crisis: Dynamics of informed and heuristic-driven trading," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 60-66.
    2. Kahya, Evrim Hilal & Ekinci, Cumhur, 2022. "Disposition bias among Borsa Istanbul investors: What do we know about type, size and trading frequency?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    3. Papadamou, Stephanos & Fassas, Athanasios P. & Kenourgios, Dimitris & Dimitriou, Dimitrios, 2023. "Effects of the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic on implied stock market volatility: International evidence using a google trend measure," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    4. van Dooren, Bono & Galema, Rients, 2018. "Socially responsible investors and the disposition effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 42-52.
    5. SOSA-CASTRO, Miriam, 2022. "Equity Market Volatility Impact On S&P 500 Sector Indexes, 1989-2021," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 22(1), pages 39-60.
    6. Huang, Lingxi & Guenther, Benno, 2024. "Information and context matter: debiasing the disposition effect with lasting impact," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122579, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Ranjeeta Sadhwani & Mujeeb U Rehman Bhayo, 2019. "Momentum and Disposition Effect in the stock market of USA," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 8911340, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    8. Georgios Fatouros & Konstantinos Metaxas & John Soldatos & Dimosthenis Kyriazis, 2024. "Can Large Language Models Beat Wall Street? Unveiling the Potential of AI in Stock Selection," Papers 2401.03737, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    9. Suman Gupta & Vinay Goyal & Vinay Kumar Kalakbandi & Sankarshan Basu, 2018. "Overconfidence, trading volume and liquidity effect in Asia’s Giants: evidence from pre-, during- and post-global recession," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 45(3), pages 235-257, September.
    10. Haykir, Ozkan & Yagli, Ibrahim & Aktekin Gok, Emine Dilara & Budak, Hilal, 2022. "Oil price explosivity and stock return: Do sector and firm size matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Brooks, Chris & Williams, Louis, 2022. "When it comes to the crunch: Retail investor decision-making during periods of market volatility," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Bachmann, Kremena, 2024. "Do you have a choice?: Implications for belief updating and the disposition effect," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Stephen L Cheung, 2024. "A meta-analysis of disposition effect experiments," Working Papers 2024-02, University of Sydney, School of Economics.
    14. Vanessa Martins Valcanover & Igor Bernardi Sonza & Wesley Vieira da Silva, 2020. "Behavioral Finance Experiments: A Recent Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    15. Abudy, Menachem (Meni) & Gildin, Ilan & Mugerman, Yevgeny, 2024. "Don't move my cheese: Financial advice adaptation to regulatory change," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Quan Gan & Maggie Rong Hu & Wayne Xinwei Wan, 2022. "Contract rescission in the real estate presale market," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1054-1106, December.
    17. Ahn, Jungkyu & Ahn, Yongkil, 2023. "Clogged pipes in the repo market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    18. Cheng-Po Lai, 2019. "Personality Traits and Stock Investment of Individuals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Hong, Yanran & Wang, Lu & Ye, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Yaojie, 2022. "Dynamic asymmetric impact of equity market uncertainty on energy markets: A time-varying causality analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 535-546.
    20. Ahn, Yongkil, 2024. "Optimal stopping decisions and the disposition effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:12:y:2024:i:3:p:65-:d:1427648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.