IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v11y2023i1p28-d1054283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of Indonesian Pension Funds: A Two-Stage Additive Network DEA Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Paskalis Seran

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Jl Diponegoro 52-60, Salatiga 50711, Indonesia
    Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira, Jl. A. Yani 50-52-25, Kupang 85225, Indonesia)

  • Usil Sis Sucahyo

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Jl Diponegoro 52-60, Salatiga 50711, Indonesia)

  • Apriani Dorkas Rambu Atahau

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Jl Diponegoro 52-60, Salatiga 50711, Indonesia)

  • Supramono Supramono

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Jl Diponegoro 52-60, Salatiga 50711, Indonesia)

Abstract

Employer pension funds (EPFs) manage funds contributed by their members and sponsors with the ultimate goal of providing adequate pension benefits for beneficiaries upon retirement. The critical issue for EPFs is, therefore, their efficiency. This study aims to investigate Indonesian EPFs’ technical efficiency and its determinants using data from 38 EPFs actively operating in 2011–2017. By conceptualizing EPFs’ management processes as a network, this study employs the two-stage additive network data envelopment analysis (DEA) to measure the performance of EPFs based on their overall efficiency, operational efficiency, and investment efficiency. A regression analysis is then performed to examine the determinants of EPFs’ efficiency. The results reveal that investment efficiency is the main source of EPFs’ overall inefficiency, implying that more attention should be directed towards investment management when the EPFs seek to improve their overall performance. The regression analysis shows that size and ownership are the most significant factors that determine EPFs’ efficiency. Ownership positively correlates with both overall efficiency and investment efficiency, while size negatively affects investment efficiency. This study concludes that in order to improve their overall performance, EPFs need to make more efforts in investment management, while accounting for size and ownership as important determinants. This study provides a projection analysis model as a practical guidline for EPFs to improve their performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Paskalis Seran & Usil Sis Sucahyo & Apriani Dorkas Rambu Atahau & Supramono Supramono, 2023. "The Efficiency of Indonesian Pension Funds: A Two-Stage Additive Network DEA Approach," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:28-:d:1054283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/1/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/1/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo Antolin & Sebastian Schich & Juan Yermo, 2011. "The Economic Impact of Protracted Low Interest Rates on Pension Funds and Insurance Companies," OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, OECD Publishing, vol. 2011(1), pages 237-256.
    2. Kao, Chiang, 2016. "Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 778-786.
    3. Silberston, Aubrey, 1972. "Economies of Scale in Theory and Practice," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(325), pages 369-391, Supplemen.
    4. Sunaryo Sunaryo & Alvia Santoni & Endri Endri & Muhammad Nusjirwan Harahap, 2020. "Determinants of Capital Adequacy Ratio for Pension Funds: A Case Study in Indonesia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 203-213, July.
    5. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    6. Michiel Bijlsma & Johannes Bonekamp & Casper Ewijk & Ferry Haaijen, 2018. "Funded Pensions and Economic Growth," De Economist, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 337-362, September.
    7. Nicholas Barr & Peter Diamond, 2006. "The Economics of Pensions," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 22(1), pages 15-39, Spring.
    8. Gosse A.G. Alserda & Jacob A. Bikker & Fieke S.G. Van Der Lecq, 2018. "X-efficiency and economies of scale in pension fund administration and investment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(48), pages 5164-5188, October.
    9. Felisitas Defung & Ruhul Salim & Harry Bloch, 2016. "Has regulatory reform had any impact on bank efficiency in Indonesia? A two-stage analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(52), pages 5060-5074, November.
    10. Mukul Asher & Azad S. Bali, 2015. "Public Pension Programs in Southeast Asia: An Assessment," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 10(2), pages 225-245, July.
    11. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Hongxian Zhang & Liang Guo & Maggie Hao, 2018. "Corruption, governance, and public pension funds," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 883-919, November.
    13. Premachandra, I.M. & Zhu, Joe & Watson, John & Galagedera, Don U.A., 2012. "Best-performing US mutual fund families from 1993 to 2008: Evidence from a novel two-stage DEA model for efficiency decomposition," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3302-3317.
    14. Chiang Kao, 2014. "Efficiency Decomposition in Network Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 55-77, Springer.
    15. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serhat Yüksel & Serkan Eti & Hasan Dinçer & Hasan Meral & Muhammad Umar & Yaşar Gökalp, 2025. "A novel fuzzy decision-making approach to pension fund investments in renewable energy," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng, Fanyong & Xiong, Beibei, 2021. "Logical efficiency decomposition for general two-stage systems in view of cross efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 622-632.
    2. Kao, Chiang, 2020. "Decomposition of slacks-based efficiency measures in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 588-600.
    3. Chen, Ya & Pan, Yongbin & Liu, Haoxiang & Wu, Huaqing & Deng, Guangwei, 2023. "Efficiency analysis of Chinese universities with shared inputs: An aggregated two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Xiao, Huijuan & Wang, Daoping & Qi, Yu & Shao, Shuai & Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli, 2021. "The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Kao, Chiang, 2018. "Multiplicative aggregation of division efficiencies in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 328-336.
    6. Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos & Beullens, Patrick & Kyrgiakos, Leonidas Sotirios & Klein, Jonathan, 2022. "Measurement and evaluation of multi-function parallel network hierarchical DEA systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Kao, Chiang, 2019. "Inefficiency identification for closed series production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 599-607.
    9. Ioannis E. Tsolas, 2020. "The Determinants of the Performance of Precious Metal Mutual Funds," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, November.
    10. Justice G. Djokoto & Ferguson K. Gidiglo & Francis Y. Srofenyoh & Kofi Aaron A-O. Agyei-Henaku & Akua A. Afrane Arthur & Charlotte Badu-Prah & John Fry, 2020. "Sectoral and spatio-temporal differentiation in technical efficiency: A meta-regression," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1773659-177, January.
    11. Svetlana V. Ratner & Artem M. Shaposhnikov & Andrey V. Lychev, 2023. "Network DEA and Its Applications (2017–2022): A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Zhang, Linyan & Chen, Kun, 2019. "Hierarchical network systems: An application to high-technology industry in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 118-131.
    13. Claudio Pinto, 2021. "Performances Management When Modelling Internal Structure of a Production Process," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(7), pages 133-133, July.
    14. See, Kok Fong & Md Hamzah, Nurhafiza & Yu, Ming-Miin, 2021. "Metafrontier efficiency analysis for hospital pharmacy services using dynamic network DEA framework," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    16. M.V. Leonov, 2021. "Review of Modern Approaches for Assessing the Effectiveness of Banking," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(2), pages 294-326.
    17. Valentin Zelenyuk, 2023. "Productivity analysis: roots, foundations, trends and perspectives," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 229-247, December.
    18. Lívia Mariana Lopes de Souza Torres & Francisco S. Ramos, 2024. "Are Brazilian Higher Education Institutions Efficient in Their Graduate Activities? A Two-Stage Dynamic Data-Envelopment-Analysis Cooperative Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-41, March.
    19. Camanho, Ana Santos & Silva, Maria Conceicao & Piran, Fabio Sartori & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco, 2024. "A literature review of economic efficiency assessments using Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 1-18.
    20. Pejman Peykani & Ali Emrouznejad & Emran Mohammadi & Jafar Gheidar-Kheljani, 2024. "A novel robust network data envelopment analysis approach for performance assessment of mutual funds under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1149-1175, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:28-:d:1054283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.