IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v8y2011i5p1520-1533d12365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restaurant and Bar Owners’ Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Attitudes Regarding Smoking Bans in Five Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiling Liu

    (Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 27 Nanwei Rd, Beijing 100050, China
    School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, 50 University Hall #7360, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • S. Katharine Hammond

    (School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, 50 University Hall #7360, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA)

  • Andrew Hyland

    (Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA)

  • Mark J. Travers

    (Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA)

  • Yan Yang

    (Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 27 Nanwei Rd, Beijing 100050, China)

  • Yi Nan

    (Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 27 Nanwei Rd, Beijing 100050, China)

  • Guoze Feng

    (Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 27 Nanwei Rd, Beijing 100050, China)

  • Qiang Li

    (Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Yuan Jiang

    (Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 27 Nanwei Rd, Beijing 100050, China)

Abstract

Despite the great progress made towards smoke-free environments, only 9% of countries worldwide mandate smoke-free restaurants and bars. Smoking was generally not regulated in restaurants and bars in China before 2008. This study was designed to examine the public attitudes towards banning smoking in these places in China. A convenience sample of 814 restaurants and bars was selected in five Chinese cities and all owners of these venues were interviewed in person by questionnaire in 2007. Eighty six percent of current nonsmoking subjects had at least one-day exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) at work in the past week. Only 51% of subjects knew SHS could cause heart disease. Only 17% and 11% of subjects supported prohibiting smoking completely in restaurants and in bars, respectively, while their support for restricting smoking to designated areas was much higher. Fifty three percent of subjects were willing to prohibit or restrict smoking in their own venues. Of those unwilling to do so, 82% thought smoking bans would reduce revenue, and 63% thought indoor air quality depended on ventilation rather than smoking bans. These results showed that there was support for smoking bans among restaurant or bar owners in China despite some knowledge gaps. To facilitate smoking bans in restaurants and bars, it is important to promote health education on specific hazards of SHS, provide country-specific evidence on smoking bans and hospitality revenues, and disseminate information that restricting smoking and ventilation alone cannot eliminate SHS hazards.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiling Liu & S. Katharine Hammond & Andrew Hyland & Mark J. Travers & Yan Yang & Yi Nan & Guoze Feng & Qiang Li & Yuan Jiang, 2011. "Restaurant and Bar Owners’ Exposure to Secondhand Smoke and Attitudes Regarding Smoking Bans in Five Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:8:y:2011:i:5:p:1520-1533:d:12365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/5/1520/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/8/5/1520/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ong, M K & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2004. "Cardiovascular health and economic effects of smoke-free workplaces," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt2ck7x753, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    2. Sargent, R P & Shepard, R M & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2004. "Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: before and after study," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3276d6r6, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanaka D. Shetty & Thomas DeLeire & Chapin White & Jayanta Bhattacharya, 2011. "Changes in U.S. hospitalization and mortality rates following smoking bans," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 6-28, December.
    2. Marco D. Huesch & Truls Østbye & Michael K. Ong, 2012. "Measuring The Effect Of Policy Interventions At The Population Level: Some Methodological Concerns," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(10), pages 1234-1249, October.
    3. Patrick Goodman & Sally Haw & Zubair Kabir & Luke Clancy, 2009. "Are there health benefits associated with comprehensive smoke-free laws," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(6), pages 367-378, December.
    4. Bharadwaj, Prashant & Johnsen, Julian V. & Løken, Katrine V., 2014. "Smoking bans, maternal smoking and birth outcomes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 72-93.
    5. Daniel Kuehnle & Christoph Wunder, 2017. "The Effects of Smoking Bans on Self‐Assessed Health: Evidence from Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 321-337, March.
    6. Reichmann, Gerhard & Sommersguter-Reichmann, Margit, 2012. "The Austrian Tobacco Act in practice – Analysing the effectiveness of partial smoking bans in Austrian restaurants and bars," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 304-311.
    7. L. Pieroni & L. Salmasi, 2015. "Does Cigarette Smoking Affect Body Weight? Causal Estimates from the Clean Indoor Air Law Discontinuity," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 82(328), pages 671-704, October.
    8. Nykiforuk, Candace & Campbell, Sharon & Cameron, Roy & Brown, Stephen & Eyles, John, 2007. "Relationships between community characteristics and municipal smoke-free bylaw status and strength," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 358-368, February.
    9. Lin, Tsui-Fang, 2008. "Modifiable health risk factors and medical expenditures - The case of Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1727-1736, December.
    10. Shane Allwright, 2008. "The impact of banning smoking in workplaces," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 81-92, July.
    11. Pryce, Robert, 2019. "The effect of the United Kingdom smoking ban on alcohol spending: Evidence from the Living Costs and Food Survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 936-940.
    12. Miaoqing Yang & Eugenio Zucchelli, 2018. "The impact of public smoking bans on well‐being externalities: Evidence from a policy experiment," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 65(3), pages 224-247, July.
    13. Gregor Pfeifer & Mirjam Reutter & Kristina Strohmaier, 2020. "Goodbye Smokers’ Corner: Health Effects of School Smoking Bans," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(3), pages 1068-1104.
    14. Miaoqing Yang & Eugenio Zucchelli, 2015. "The impact of public smoking bans on well-being externalities: evidence from a natural experiment," Working Papers 85310008, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    15. John Moraros & Yelena Bird & Shande Chen & Robert Buckingham & Richard S. Meltzer & Surasri Prapasiri & Luis H. Solis, 2010. "The Impact of the 2002 Delaware Smoking Ordinance on Heart Attack and Asthma," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Origo Federica & Lucifora Claudio, 2013. "The Effect of Comprehensive Smoking Bans in European Workplaces," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 55-81, March.
    17. Fabrizio Mazzonna & Paola Salari, 2018. "Can a smoking ban save your heart?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(10), pages 1435-1449, October.
    18. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2008-059 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Johannes Bendler & Sebastian Wagner & Tobias Brandt & Dirk Neumann, 2014. "Taming Uncertainty in Big Data," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(5), pages 279-288, October.
    20. Stefan Boes & Joachim Marti & Johanna Catherine Maclean, 2015. "The Impact of Smoking Bans on Smoking and Consumer Behavior: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence from Switzerland," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(11), pages 1502-1516, November.
    21. Reichmuth, Wolfgang H. & Sarferaz, Samad, 2008. "The influence of the business cycle on mortality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2008-059, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:8:y:2011:i:5:p:1520-1533:d:12365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.