Author
Listed:
- Jayne Marie Foley
(Million Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)
- Carol F. Kwiatkowski
(Million Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)
- Johanna R. Rochester
(Million Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)
- Iva Neveux
(Healthy Nevada Project, Renown Health, Reno, NV 89557, USA
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA)
- Shaun Dabe
(Healthy Nevada Project, Renown Health, Reno, NV 89557, USA)
- Michael Kupec Lathrop
(Million Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)
- Eric J. Daza
(Million Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)
- Joseph J. Grzymski
(Healthy Nevada Project, Renown Health, Reno, NV 89557, USA
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA)
- Ben K. Greenfield
(Public Health Program, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Portland, ME 04104, USA)
- Jenna Hua
(Million Marker Wellness, Inc., Berkeley, CA 94704, USA)
Abstract
Background: Daily-use products, including personal care products, household products, and dietary supplements, often contain ingredients that raise concerns regarding harmful chemical exposure. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) found in daily-use products are associated with numerous adverse health effects. Methods: This pilot study explores the relationship between concentrations of EDCs in urine samples and products used 24 h prior to sample collection, and ingredients of concern in those products, in 140 adults of reproductive age in Northern Nevada. Results: Having higher numbers of products and ingredients of concern, especially in the personal care category, was associated with higher levels of mono-(-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP). Similarly, taking more supplements was associated with higher levels of methylparaben (MePB). In contrast, using household products with more ingredients of concern was associated with lower levels of monobutyl phthalate (MBP). Generally, women used more products, were exposed to more ingredients of concern and had higher urinary metabolites than men. Participants who rated themselves as being in poor/fair health were exposed to more personal care and supplement ingredients of concern than those in better health. Interestingly, those in excellent health also took supplements with more ingredients of concern. Conclusions: Greater product use and more ingredients of concern are associated with urinary metabolites of known EDCs and self-ratings of poor health. Women and people who take supplements are at greater risk, and even people who consider themselves to be healthy can be highly exposed. More education among the general public is needed to make people aware of the presence of these chemicals in their everyday products so they can make efforts to avoid them.
Suggested Citation
Jayne Marie Foley & Carol F. Kwiatkowski & Johanna R. Rochester & Iva Neveux & Shaun Dabe & Michael Kupec Lathrop & Eric J. Daza & Joseph J. Grzymski & Ben K. Greenfield & Jenna Hua, 2025.
"Associations Between Daily-Use Products and Urinary Biomarkers of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Adults of Reproductive Age,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(1), pages 1-16, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:99-:d:1565449
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:99-:d:1565449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.