IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1130-d1465045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“They Can’t Possibly Understand What I’m Going Through”: Female Farmers’ Perspectives on Barriers to Care in Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Noah Hopkins

    (Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Lauren Ledbetter Griffeth

    (Office of Learning and Organizational Development, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30605, USA)

  • Chase Reece

    (Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

  • Christina Proctor

    (Department of Health Promotion and Behavior, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore female farmers’ perspectives on barriers to engaging with resources for physical and mental healthcare faced by agriculture producers in the state of Georgia. In-depth interviews were conducted with female farm owners and managers ( n = 16) across the state. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and researchers coded interviews separately before thematic analysis was used to identify common themes. Three primary themes were identified: (i) formal healthcare challenges, (ii) stigma, and (iii) cultural norms. Formal healthcare challenges included time constraints, healthcare costs, and a lack of cultural competence from healthcare providers. Both community and self-stigma were identified as barriers to engaging with mental health resources. Cultural norms that acted as a barrier to care included the prioritization of farm operations, self-reliance, pride, and the minimization of health concerns. Interviewees identified gender differences in the impact of stigma and cultural norms, reporting that these sociocultural barriers were more prominent among older, male producers. Central to many of these barriers is the concept of ‘farm identity’, where farmers’ commitment to their operations consistently trumped concerns about physical or mental health. Future efforts to improve health outcomes among farmers should utilize the concept of farm identity as a guide for tailoring interventions and improving cultural competence among rural healthcare providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Noah Hopkins & Lauren Ledbetter Griffeth & Chase Reece & Christina Proctor, 2024. "“They Can’t Possibly Understand What I’m Going Through”: Female Farmers’ Perspectives on Barriers to Care in Georgia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1130-:d:1465045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1130/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1130/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa J. Hull & Kate M. Gunn & Ashleigh E. Smith & Martin Jones & James Dollman, 2022. "“We’re Lucky to Have Doctors at All”; A Qualitative Exploration of Australian Farmers’ Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Related Help-Seeking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Briana N. M. Hagen & Alex Sawatzky & Sherilee L. Harper & Terri L. O’Sullivan & Andria Jones-Bitton, 2021. "What Impacts Perceived Stress among Canadian Farmers? A Mixed-Methods Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Dale D. Woolford & Matthew F. Smout & Deborah Turnbull & Kate M. Gunn, 2022. "Male Farmers’ Perspectives on Psychological Wellbeing Self-Management Strategies That Work for Them and How Barriers to Seeking Professional Mental Health Assistance Could Be Overcome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Champness & Leigh Vial & Carlos Ballester & John Hornbuckle, 2023. "Evaluating the Performance and Opportunity Cost of a Smart-Sensed Automated Irrigation System for Water-Saving Rice Cultivation in Temperate Australia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Rochelle Thompson & Briana N. M. Hagen & Margaret N. Lumley & Charlotte B. Winder & Basem Gohar & Andria Jones-Bitton, 2023. "“An Incredible Amount of Stress before You Even Put a Shovel in the Ground”: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Farming Stressors in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Maria Gabriella Melchiorre & Sabrina Quattrini & Giovanni Lamura & Marco Socci, 2021. "A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Care Arrangements of Older People with Limited Physical Abilities Living Alone in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-35, December.
    4. Maria Gabriella Melchiorre & Marco Socci & Sabrina Quattrini & Giovanni Lamura & Barbara D’Amen, 2022. "Frail Older People Ageing in Place in Italy: Use of Health Services and Relationship with General Practitioner," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Fadare, Olusegun & Zanello, Giacomo & Srinivasan, Chittur, 2023. "Stressor or succour? Examining the association between conflict, livestock assets, and farmers’ mental health in Nigeria," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    6. Dale D. Woolford & Matthew F. Smout & Deborah Turnbull & Kate M. Gunn, 2022. "Male Farmers’ Perspectives on Psychological Wellbeing Self-Management Strategies That Work for Them and How Barriers to Seeking Professional Mental Health Assistance Could Be Overcome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Rochelle Thompson & Briana N. M. Hagen & Andria Jones-Bitton, 2023. "Tractors, Talk, Mindset, Mantras, Detachment, and Distraction: A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Coping Strategies Used by Farmers in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1130-:d:1465045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.