IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i8p1012-d1447826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adapting the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) Framework for England: Development of a Community Resilience Index

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Camacho

    (Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Roger T. Webb

    (Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Peter Bower

    (Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Luke Munford

    (Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

Community resilience results from complex interactions between people, places, and environments. Measuring community resilience aligns with policy objectives to enhance resilience to adverse events and address spatial disparities. The Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) is a composite index used to measure resilience. This study adapts the BRIC approach to develop a Community Resilience Index (CRI) for England. A systematic review informed indicator selection, and principal components analysis was used to define sub-indices and allocate weightings. The resulting CRI comprised 44 indicators across five domains, quantifying the resilience of English local authorities. Geographical comparisons were made using t -tests and ANOVA, and the CRI was validated against the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The mean CRI score for local authorities in England was 83.1, ranging from 53.3 to 108.9. Resilience scores showed spatial patterning, with London and the South East scoring highest. The North had lower CRI scores than the Midlands and South ( p = 0.022). Coastal and rural areas also showed lower resilience ( p < 0.001). CRI and IMD were inversely correlated (r = −0.564, p < 0.0001). This study contributes to the literature by providing the first detailed assessment of community resilience in England using an adapted BRIC framework. The CRI provides a framework for measuring community resilience in England and could be used to explore associations with health outcomes and guide funding allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Camacho & Roger T. Webb & Peter Bower & Luke Munford, 2024. "Adapting the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) Framework for England: Development of a Community Resilience Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:8:p:1012-:d:1447826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/8/1012/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/8/1012/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan L. Cutter & Kevin D. Ash & Christopher T. Emrich, 2016. "Urban–Rural Differences in Disaster Resilience," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(6), pages 1236-1252, November.
    2. Plough, A. & Fielding, J.E. & Chandra, A. & Williams, M. & Eisenman, D. & Wells, K.B. & Law, G.Y. & Fogleman, S. & Magaña, A., 2013. "Building community disaster resilience: Perspectives from a large urban county department of public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(7), pages 1190-1197.
    3. Laura A. Bakkensen & Cate Fox‐Lent & Laura K. Read & Igor Linkov, 2017. "Validating Resilience and Vulnerability Indices in the Context of Natural Disasters," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 982-1004, May.
    4. Sanam K. Aksha & Christopher T. Emrich, 2020. "Benchmarking Community Disaster Resilience in Nepal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Deborah Platts-Fowler & David Robinson, 2016. "Community resilience: a policy tool for local government?," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 762-784, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sahar Derakhshan & Leah Blackwood & Margot Habets & Julia F. Effgen & Susan L. Cutter, 2022. "Prisoners of Scale: Downscaling Community Resilience Measurements for Enhanced Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Mikhail Rogov & Céline Rozenblat, 2018. "Urban Resilience Discourse Analysis: Towards a Multi-Level Approach to Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Frijters, Paul & Johnston, David W. & Knott, Rachel & Torgler, Benno, 2021. "Resilience to Disaster: Evidence from Daily Wellbeing Data," IZA Discussion Papers 14220, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Wilmer Martínez-Rivera & Thomaz Carvalhaes & Petar Jevtić & T. Agami Reddy, 2023. "A treatment-effect model to quantify human dimensions of disaster impacts: the case of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 2033-2068, March.
    5. Joan Pauline Talubo & Roy Alvin Malenab & Stephen Morse & Devendra Saroj, 2022. "Practitioners’ Participatory Development of Indicators for Island Community Resilience to Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Saud Alshehri & Yacine Rezgui & Haijiang Li, 2015. "Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2221-2245, February.
    7. Yusuke Toyoda, 2021. "Survey paper: achievements and perspectives of community resilience approaches to societal systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 705-756, October.
    8. Hsin-I Shih & Tzu-Yuan Chao & Yi-Ting Huang & Yi-Fang Tu & Tzu-Ching Sung & Jung-Der Wang & Chia-Ming Chang, 2020. "Increased Medical Visits and Mortality among Adults with Cardiovascular Diseases in Severely Affected Areas after Typhoon Morakot," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Rachel Samuels & John E. Taylor & Neda Mohammadi, 2020. "Silence of the Tweets: incorporating social media activity drop-offs into crisis detection," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1455-1477, August.
    10. Shine George & P. P. Anil Kumar, 2022. "Indicator-based assessment of capacity development for disaster preparedness in the Indian context," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 417-435, September.
    11. Janová, Jitka & Hampel, David & Nerudová, Danuše, 2019. "Design and validation of a tax sustainability index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 916-926.
    12. Kai Wang & Zhe Wang & Jun Deng & Yuanyuan Feng & Quanfang Li, 2022. "Study on the Evaluation of Emergency Management Capacity of Resilient Communities by the AHP-TOPSIS Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang & Wenjing Jiang & Guanwen Pu & Kin-Sun Chan & Ying Lau, 2022. "Social Media Engagement in Two Governmental Schemes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Macao," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.
    14. Moslem Imani & Hoda Fakour & Shang-Lien Lo, 2021. "Exploring Climate Disaster Resilience: Insight into City and Zone Levels of Southern Taiwan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Anthony McCosker & Anne Matan, 2018. "Barriers and Enablers to Planning Initiatives for Active Living and Health," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-68, January.
    16. Judy P. Che-Castaldo & Rémi Cousin & Stefani Daryanto & Grace Deng & Mei-Ling E. Feng & Rajesh K. Gupta & Dezhi Hong & Ryan M. McGranaghan & Olukunle O. Owolabi & Tianyi Qu & Wei Ren & Toryn L. J. Sch, 2021. "Critical Risk Indicators (CRIs) for the electric power grid: a survey and discussion of interconnected effects," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 594-615, December.
    17. Alan Kirschenbaum, 2021. "Reducing patient surge: community based social networks as first responders," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 163-175, August.
    18. Jang, Seongsoo & Kim, Jinwon, 2022. "Remedying Airbnb COVID-19 disruption through tourism clusters and community resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 529-542.
    19. Ewelina Zarzycka & Joanna Krasodomska, 2021. "Environmental key performance indicators: the role of regulations and stakeholder influence," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 651-666, December.
    20. Yi Liu & Tiantian Gu & Lingzhi Li & Peng Cui & Yan Liu, 2023. "Measuring the Urban Resilience Abased on Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) Model in the Post-Pandemic Era: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:8:p:1012-:d:1447826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.