IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i7p882-d1430167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Participatory Approach in Healthcare Establishments as a Specific French Organizational Model at Hospital Department Level to Prevent Burnout among Caregivers: What Are the Perceptions of Its Implementation and Its Potential Contributions by These Caregivers?

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Arnaudeau

    (PSITEC (Psychology: Interactions Time Emotions Cognition, ULR 4072), University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France)

  • Marion Nickum

    (PSITEC (Psychology: Interactions Time Emotions Cognition, ULR 4072), University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France)

  • Evelyne Fouquereau

    (QualiPsy UR 1901, Department of Psychology, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France)

  • Séverine Chevalier

    (QualiPsy UR 1901, Department of Psychology, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France)

  • Nicolas Gillet

    (QualiPsy UR 1901, Department of Psychology, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France
    Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 75005 Paris, France)

  • René Mokounkolo

    (QualiPsy UR 1901, Department of Psychology, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France)

  • Julien Lejeune

    (QualiPsy UR 1901, Department of Psychology, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France)

  • Romuald Seizeur

    (Neurosurgery Department, Brest University Hospital, University of Brest, LaTIM UMR 1101, 29200 Brest, France)

  • Philippe Colombat

    (QualiPsy UR 1901, Department of Psychology, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France)

  • Christine Jeoffrion

    (LIP/PC2S, University Grenoble Alpes, University Savoie Mont Blanc, 38000 Grenoble, France)

Abstract

(1) Background: Manifestations of burnout are regularly observed in the healthcare population. The participatory approach (PA) is a specific organization in the French health service aimed at preserving and improving the psychological health of these staff at work. The main objective of this study was to explore with healthcare professionals their perceptions of the effectiveness of the four PA components (multi-professional team meetings, in-service training, team support meetings and the project approach) implemented to date within French hospital departments, the methods of their implementation and the potential contributions of such an approach to their quality of working life and working conditions (QWLWC), and the quality of care provided. (2) Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 healthcare professionals in French hospital departments between March and April 2021. After they were recorded, the collected data was transcribed in full and subjected to thematic analysis. (3) Results: According to care providers, PA is only partially deployed in these departments today. Nevertheless, it is helping to develop multi-professional communication, and improves the quality of life at work as well as quality of care. (4) Conclusions: In the light of these results, the creation of a tool for the large-scale evaluation of PA implementation in hospitals emerges as essential, as its deployment in all hospital departments could help reduce the suffering of care professionals. In addition, a better articulation between the concepts of Magnet Hospitals and those of PA would prove heuristically promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Arnaudeau & Marion Nickum & Evelyne Fouquereau & Séverine Chevalier & Nicolas Gillet & René Mokounkolo & Julien Lejeune & Romuald Seizeur & Philippe Colombat & Christine Jeoffrion, 2024. "The Participatory Approach in Healthcare Establishments as a Specific French Organizational Model at Hospital Department Level to Prevent Burnout among Caregivers: What Are the Perceptions of Its Impl," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:882-:d:1430167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/7/882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:7:p:882-:d:1430167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.