IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i6p746-d1410343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Podcasts as Patient Preparation for Hospital Visits—An Interview Study Exploring Patients’ Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Jannie Christina Frølund

    (Department of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, DK 7100 Vejle, Denmark)

  • Anders Løkke

    (Department of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, DK 7100 Vejle, Denmark
    Department of Regional Reseacrh, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløvsvej 19, DK 5000 Odense, Denmark)

  • Hanne Irene Jensen

    (Department of Regional Reseacrh, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløvsvej 19, DK 5000 Odense, Denmark
    Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vejle Hospital, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, DK 7100 Vejle, Denmark
    Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sygehusvej 24, DK 6000 Kolding, Denmark)

  • Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard

    (Department of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, DK 7100 Vejle, Denmark
    Department of Regional Reseacrh, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløvsvej 19, DK 5000 Odense, Denmark)

Abstract

Introduction: Podcasts have emerged as a promising tool in patient preparation for hospital visits. However, the nuanced experiences of patients who engage with this medium remain underexplored. Objectives: This study explored patients’ experiences of receiving information by way of podcasts prior to their hospital visits. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients with suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, or sleep apnea. The method of data analysis chosen was thematic analysis. Results: Based on data from 24 interviews, five key themes were identified: technical challenges in utilization of podcasts; individual preferences for information prior to hospital visits; building trust and reducing anxiety through podcasts; the role of podcasts as an accessible and convenient source of information; and enhancement of engagement and empowerment through podcasts. Additionally, the study highlighted the critical importance of tailoring podcasts’ content to individual preferences to optimize the delivery of healthcare information. Conclusions: Podcasts can serve as a meaningful supplement to traditional information sources for patients. However, it is important to recognize that not all patients may be able to engage with this medium effectively due to technical challenges or personal preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Jannie Christina Frølund & Anders Løkke & Hanne Irene Jensen & Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard, 2024. "The Use of Podcasts as Patient Preparation for Hospital Visits—An Interview Study Exploring Patients’ Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:746-:d:1410343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/746/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/746/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian P. Smith & Chiara L. Whichello & Esther W. Bekker-Grob & Maureen P. M. H. Rutten-van Mölken & Jorien Veldwijk & G. Ardine Wit, 2023. "The Impact of Video-Based Educational Materials with Voiceovers on Preferences for Glucose Monitoring Technology in Patients with Diabetes: A Randomised Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(3), pages 223-237, May.
    2. Gaston, Christine M. & Mitchell, Geoffrey, 2005. "Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 2252-2264, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Holly O. Witteman & Laura D. Scherer & Teresa Gavaruzzi & Arwen H. Pieterse & Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis & Selma Chipenda Dansokho & Nicole Exe & Valerie C. Kahn & Deb Feldman-Stewart & Nananda F. Col & Ale, 2016. "Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(4), pages 453-471, May.
    2. Zandra Engelbak Nielsen & Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen, 2019. "Cancer patients’ perceptions of factors influencing their decisions on participation in clinical drug trials: A qualitative meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2443-2461, July.
    3. Liv-Helen Heggland & Kjell Hausken, 2013. "A Qualitative Identification of Categories of Patient Participation in Decision-Making by Health Care Professionals and Patients During Surgical Treatment," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 22(2), pages 206-227, May.
    4. Hamblin, Richard & Minko, Nikolai & Shuker, Carl & Hill, Jennifer & Merry, Alan F., 2018. "What happens at the end of life? Using linked administrative health data to understand healthcare usage in the last year of life in New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 783-790.
    5. Liv‐Helen Heggland & Kjell Hausken, 2014. "Patient participation, decision‐makers and information flow in surgical treatment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1430-1444, May.
    6. Liv-Helen Heggland & Torvald Øgaard & Aslaug Mikkelsen & Kjell Hausken, 2012. "Patient Participation in Surgical Treatment Decision Making from the Patients' Perspective: Validation of an Instrument," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-8, July.
    7. Klein, Jens & von dem Knesebeck, Olaf, 2015. "Socioeconomic inequalities in prostate cancer survival: A review of the evidence and explanatory factors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 9-18.
    8. Rebecca Jaks & Elena Guggiari & Saskia Maria De Gani & Dunja Nicca, 2023. "Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:746-:d:1410343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.