IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i4p494-d1377724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between the Quantity of Nurse–Doctor Interprofessional Collaboration and in-Patient Mortality: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sandesh Pantha

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Martin Jones

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
    Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla Norrie, SA 5608, Australia)

  • Nompilo Moyo

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia
    Victorian Tuberculosis Program, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Bijaya Pokhrel

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Diana Kushemererwa

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

  • Richard Gray

    (School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia)

Abstract

The level of nurse–doctor interprofessional collaboration may influence patient outcomes, including mortality. To date, no systematic reviews have investigated the association between the quantity of nurse–doctor interprofessional collaboration and inpatient mortality. A systematic review was conducted. We included studies that measured the quantity of nurse–doctor interprofessional collaboration and in-patient mortality. Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Register) were searched. Two researchers undertook the title, abstract, and full-text screening. The risk of bias was determined using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) critical appraisal tool. Six reports from three observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Participants included 1.32 million patients, 29,591 nurses, and 191 doctors. The included studies had a high risk of bias. Of the three studies, one reported a significant association and one found no association between the quantity of nurse–doctor collaboration and mortality. The third study reported on the quantity of nurse–doctor collaboration but did not report the test of this association. We found no high-quality evidence to suggest the amount of nurse–doctor interprofessional collaboration was associated with mortality in medical and surgical inpatients. There is a need for further high-quality research to evaluate the association between the amount of nurse–doctor collaboration and patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandesh Pantha & Martin Jones & Nompilo Moyo & Bijaya Pokhrel & Diana Kushemererwa & Richard Gray, 2024. "Association between the Quantity of Nurse–Doctor Interprofessional Collaboration and in-Patient Mortality: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:4:p:494-:d:1377724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/4/494/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/4/494/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro Lucas & Elvio Jesus & Sofia Almeida & Beatriz Araújo, 2021. "Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index in Primary Health Care in Portugal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Sahar Hassani & Anja Schou Lindman & Doris Tove Kristoffersen & Oliver Tomic & Jon Helgeland, 2015. "30-Day Survival Probabilities as a Quality Indicator for Norwegian Hospitals: Data Management and Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Claudia Fischer & Hester F Lingsma & Perla J Marang-van de Mheen & Dionne S Kringos & Niek S Klazinga & Ewout W Steyerberg, 2014. "Is the Readmission Rate a Valid Quality Indicator? A Review of the Evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ranveig Marie Boge & Arvid Steinar Haugen & Roy Miodini Nilsen & Frøydis Bruvik & Stig Harthug, 2019. "Discharge care quality in hospitalised elderly patients: Extended validation of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Nila Larisse Silva de Albuquerque & Thelma Leite de Araujo & Marcos Venicios de Oliveira Lopes & Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira, 2020. "Hierarchical analysis of factors associated with hospital readmissions for coronary heart disease: A case–control study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2329-2337, July.
    3. Meng, Zhaolin & Hui, Wen & Cai, Yuanyi & Liu, Jiazhou & Wu, Huazhang, 2020. "The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(4), pages 359-367.
    4. Na-Eun Cho & KiHoon Hong, 2021. "Toward a More Complete Picture of Readmission-Decreasing Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-8, August.
    5. Carl Willers & Anne-Marie Boström & Lennart Carlsson & Anton Lager & Rikard Lindqvist & Elisabeth Rydwik, 2021. "Readmission within three months after inpatient geriatric care—Incidence, diagnosis and associated factors in a Swedish cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Marlene Carvalho & Filomena Gaspar & Teresa Potra & Pedro Lucas, 2022. "Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Clinical Nurse Leaders for the Portuguese Culture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Ramkumar Janakiraman & Eunho Park & Emre M. Demirezen & Subodha Kumar, 2023. "The Effects of Health Information Exchange Access on Healthcare Quality and Efficiency: An Empirical Investigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 791-811, February.
    8. Damien Échevin & Bernard Fortin & Aristide Houndetoungan, 2023. "Healthcare Quality by Specialists under a Mixed Compensation System: an Empirical Analysis," CIRANO Working Papers 2023s-19, CIRANO.
    9. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Fogliatto, Flavio S. & Kurnia, Sherah & Thürer, Matthias & Capurro, Daniel, 2022. "Healthcare 4.0 digital applications: An empirical study on measures, bundles and patient-centered performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    10. Roos, Anne-Fleur & O’Donnell, Owen & Schut, Frederik T. & Van Doorslaer, Eddy & Van Gestel, Raf & Varkevisser, Marco, 2020. "Does price deregulation in a competitive hospital market damage quality?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Gisela Teixeira & Pedro Lucas & Filomena Gaspar, 2022. "International Portuguese Nurse Leaders’ Insights for Multicultural Nursing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Hilland, Geir Haakon & Hagen, Terje P. & Martinussen, Pål E., 2023. "Stayin’ alive: The introduction of municipal in-patient acute care units was associated with reduced mortality and fewer hospital readmissions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    13. Kunz, Johannes S. & Staub, Kevin E. & Winkelmann, Rainer, 2017. "Estimating Fixed Effects: Perfect Prediction and Bias in Binary Response Panel Models, with an Application to the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program," IZA Discussion Papers 11182, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Ranveig Marie Boge & Arvid Steinar Haugen & Roy Miodini Nilsen & Stig Harthug, 2018. "Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Eliana Sousa & Chiou-Fen Lin & Filomena Gaspar & Pedro Lucas, 2022. "Translation and Validation of the Indicators of Quality Nursing Work Environments in the Portuguese Cultural Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-9, September.
    16. Friebel, Rocco & Fisher, Rebecca & Deeny, Sarah R. & Gardner, Tim & Molloy, Aoife & Steventon, Adam, 2019. "The implications of high bed occupancy rates on readmission rates in England: A longitudinal study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(8), pages 765-772.
    17. Katschnig, Heinz & Straßmayr, Christa & Endel, Florian & Berger, Michael & Zauner, Günther & Kalseth, Jorid & Sfetcu, Raluca & Wahlbeck, Kristian & Tedeschi, Federico & Šprah, Lilijana, 2019. "Using national electronic health care registries for comparing the risk of psychiatric re-hospitalisation in six European countries: Opportunities and limitations," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(11), pages 1028-1035.
    18. Jacek Kryś & Błażej Łyszczarz & Zofia Wyszkowska & Kornelia Kędziora-Kornatowska, 2019. "Prevalence, Reasons, and Predisposing Factors Associated with 30-day Hospital Readmissions in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Sara Anunciada & Patrícia Benito & Filomena Gaspar & Pedro Lucas, 2022. "Validation of Psychometric Properties of the Nursing Work Index—Revised Scale in Portugal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, April.
    20. Jon Helgeland & Doris Tove Kristoffersen & Katrine Damgaard Skyrud & Anja Schou Lindman, 2016. "Variation between Hospitals with Regard to Diagnostic Practice, Coding Accuracy, and Case-Mix. A Retrospective Validation Study of Administrative Data versus Medical Records for Estimating 30-Day Mort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:4:p:494-:d:1377724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.