IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i4p389-d1362662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Healthy Lifestyle Intervention at Workplaces in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Shivneta Singh

    (Department of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, 70 Steve Biko Road, Musgrave, Berea 4001, South Africa)

  • Ashika Naicker

    (Department of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, 70 Steve Biko Road, Musgrave, Berea 4001, South Africa)

  • Heleen Grobbelaar

    (Department of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, 70 Steve Biko Road, Musgrave, Berea 4001, South Africa)

  • Evonne Shanita Singh

    (Department of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, 70 Steve Biko Road, Musgrave, Berea 4001, South Africa)

  • Donna Spiegelman

    (Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Center of Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA)

  • Archana Shrestha

    (Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Center of Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA)

Abstract

Current evidence indicates that workplace health and wellness programmes provide numerous benefits concerning altering cardiovascular risk factor profiles. Implementing health programmes at workplaces provide an opportunity to engage adults towards positive and sustainable lifestyle choices. The first step in designing lifestyle interventions for the workplace is understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing interventions in these settings. The barriers and facilitators to implementing lifestyle interventions in the workplace environment was qualitatively explored at two multinational consumer goods companies among seven workplaces in South Africa. Semi-structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with ten workplace managers. Five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among workplace employees. The IDI findings revealed that the main facilitators for participation in a lifestyle intervention programme were incentives and rewards, educational tools, workplace support, and engaging lessons. In contrast, the main facilitator of the FGDs was health and longevity. The main barriers from the IDIs included scheduling time for lifestyle interventions within production schedules at manufacturing sites, whereas time limitations, a lack of willpower and self-discipline were the main barriers identified from the FGDs. The findings of this study add to literature on the barriers and facilitators of implementing healthy lifestyle interventions at workplaces and suggest that there is a potential for successfully implementing intervention programmes to improve health outcomes, provided that such efforts are informed and guided through the engagement of workplace stakeholders, an assessment of the physical and food environment, and the availability of workplace resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Shivneta Singh & Ashika Naicker & Heleen Grobbelaar & Evonne Shanita Singh & Donna Spiegelman & Archana Shrestha, 2024. "Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Healthy Lifestyle Intervention at Workplaces in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:4:p:389-:d:1362662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/4/389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/4/389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Kelly & Steven Martin & Isla Kuhn & Andy Cowan & Carol Brayne & Louise Lafortune, 2016. "Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake and Maintenance of Healthy Behaviours by People at Mid-Life: A Rapid Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Mashudu Manafe & Paul Kiprono Chelule & Sphiwe Madiba, 2022. "The Perception of Overweight and Obesity among South African Adults: Implications for Intervention Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-10, September.
    3. Ayazullah Safi & Matthew Cole & Adam L. Kelly & Mohammed Gulrez Zariwala & Natalie C. Walker, 2022. "Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, August.
    4. O'Sullivan, C.A. & Bonnett, G.D. & McIntyre, C.L. & Hochman, Z. & Wasson, A.P., 2019. "Strategies to improve the productivity, product diversity and profitability of urban agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 133-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weiyu Mao & Jia Li & Ling Xu & Iris Chi, 2020. "Acculturation and health behaviors among older Chinese immigrants in the United States: A qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 714-722, September.
    2. Simon Marvin & Lauren Rickards & Jonathan Rutherford, 2024. "The urbanisation of controlled environment agriculture: Why does it matter for urban studies?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(8), pages 1430-1450, June.
    3. Rui de Sousa & Luís Bragança & Manuela V. da Silva & Rui S. Oliveira, 2024. "Challenges and Solutions for Sustainable Food Systems: The Potential of Home Hydroponics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Youhanna E. William & Hui An & Szu-Cheng Chien & Chew Beng Soh & Barbara Ting Wei Ang & Toshikazu Ishida & Hikaru Kobayashi & David Tan & Ryan Hong Soon Tay, 2022. "Urban-Metabolic Farming Modules on Rooftops for Eco-Resilient Farmscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Savita Hanspal & P. Raj Devasagayam, 2017. "Impact of Consumers’ Self-Image and Demographics on Preference for Healthy Labeled Foods," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, January.
    6. Anwar Al-Nuaim & Ayazullah Safi, 2023. "Factors Influencing Saudi Youth Physical Activity Participation: A Qualitative Study Based on the Social Ecological Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Giller, Ken E. & Andersson, Jens & Delaune, Thomas & Silva, João Vasco & Descheemaeker, Katrien & van de Ven, Gerrie & Schut, Antonius G.T. & van Wijk, Mark & Hammond, Jim & Hochman, Zvi & Taulya, God, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 83: The future of farming: who will produce our food?," IFAD Research Series 322005, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    8. Heino Pesch & Louis Louw, 2023. "Exploring the Industrial Symbiosis Potential of Plant Factories during the Initial Establishment Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-30, January.
    9. Marlene Rosager Lund Pedersen & Thomas Viskum Gjelstrup Bredahl & Karsten Elmose-Østerlund & Anne Faber Hansen, 2022. "Motives and Barriers Related to Physical Activity within Different Types of Built Environments: Implications for Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Antonio Moreno-Llamas & Jesús García-Mayor & Ernesto De la Cruz-Sánchez, 2020. "Physical activity barriers according to social stratification in Europe," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(8), pages 1477-1484, November.
    11. Jost Buscher & Julija Bakunowitsch & Kathrin Specht, 2023. "Transformative Potential of Vertical Farming—An Urban Planning Investigation Using Multi-Level Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Sylvia Titze & Christian Lackinger & Lena Grossschaedl & Albert Strehn & Thomas E. Dorner & Josef Niebauer & Wolfgang Schebesch-Ruf, 2018. "How Does Counselling in a Stationary Health Care Setting Affect the Attendance in a Standardised Sports Club Programme? Process Evaluation of a Quasi-Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Michael Graham Parkes & Rebekah O’Rourke & Tiago Domingos & Ricardo F. M. Teixeira, 2023. "An Experimental Portuguese Social-Enterprise Project in Urban Agriculture: A Case Study on the Influence of the Interaction of Stakeholder Roles on Sustainable Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Engler, Nicholas & Krarti, Moncef, 2021. "Review of energy efficiency in controlled environment agriculture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Muhammad Muhitur Rahman & Runa Akter & Jaber Bin Abdul Bari & Md Arif Hasan & Mohammad Shahedur Rahman & Syed Abu Shoaib & Ziad Nayef Shatnawi & Ammar Fayez Alshayeb & Faisal Ibrahim Shalabi & Aminur , 2022. "Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on the Food System Security of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Love-Koh, James & Pennington, Becky & Owen, Lesley & Taylor, Matthew & Griffin, Susan, 2020. "How health inequalities accumulate and combine to affect treatment value: A distributional cost-effectiveness analysis of smoking cessation interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    17. Wojciech Sroka & Piotr Sulewski & Jaroslaw Mikolajczyk & Karol Król, 2023. "Farming under Urban Pressure: Business Models and Success Factors of Peri-Urban Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:4:p:389-:d:1362662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.