IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i10p1368-d1500218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Complex Interaction Among Technological Innovation, Company Performance, and Occupational Safety and Health: A Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Gaia Vitrano

    (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Guido J. L. Micheli

    (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Francesca Marazzini

    (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Valeria Panio

    (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Angelo Castaldo

    (Department of Juridical and Economic Studies, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Alessia Marrocco

    (Department of Juridical and Economic Studies, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Stefano Signorini

    (Department of Medicine, Epidemiology, Occupational & Environmental Hygiene, National Institute for the Insurance of Work-Related Injuries (INAIL), 00144 Roma, Italy)

  • Alessandro Marinaccio

    (Department of Medicine, Epidemiology, Occupational & Environmental Hygiene, National Institute for the Insurance of Work-Related Injuries (INAIL), 00144 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

Technological innovation and Industry 5.0 are gaining increasing attention among researchers as they offer companies a significant competitive advantage. On the other hand, introducing these technologies also brings new risks for workers. The current literature reveals a lack of studies that effectively integrate occupational safety and health (OSH) within this emerging technological context and analyse the impacts of their use. This study aims to explore how companies interact with macro-level interventions that promote technological innovation and to understand their impact on different dimensions of company performance, including aspects related to OSH. Based on the existing literature, a research framework is presented that identifies the stakeholders involved, the inputs facilitating their interaction, and the cascading effects and changes. A mixed-methods approach was adopted by employing an in-depth survey with 89 companies responding and composed of both open-ended questions, to capture rich, qualitative insights, and multiple-choice questions, to gather quantifiable data. Two change levels have been identified: general changes and specific changes related to OSH. The analysis also delved into the main drivers and barriers that lead companies to engage with technological improvements and the multiple changes these interventions generate across company dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaia Vitrano & Guido J. L. Micheli & Francesca Marazzini & Valeria Panio & Angelo Castaldo & Alessia Marrocco & Stefano Signorini & Alessandro Marinaccio, 2024. "Examining the Complex Interaction Among Technological Innovation, Company Performance, and Occupational Safety and Health: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1368-:d:1500218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radicic, Dragana & Petković, Saša, 2023. "Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Vanessa Manni & Diego De Merich & Giuseppe Campo, 2023. "Management Approaches to Health and Safety at Work during Prevention Intervention Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Emily J. Haas & Emanuele Cauda, 2022. "Using Core Elements of Health and Safety Management Systems to Support Worker Well-Being during Technology Integration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. D’Este, Pablo & Iammarino, Simona & Savona, Maria & von Tunzelmann, Nick, 2012. "What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 482-488.
    5. Guido J. L. Micheli & Enrico Cagno & Antonio Calabrese, 2018. "The Transition from Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Interventions to OSH Outcomes: An Empirical Analysis of Mechanisms and Contextual Factors within Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zouaghi, Ferdaous & Sánchez, Mercedes & Martínez, Marian García, 2018. "Did the global financial crisis impact firms' innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high and low tech industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 92-104.
    2. Caloffi, Annalisa & Freo, Marzia & Ghinoi, Stefano & Mariani, Marco & Rossi, Federica, 2022. "Assessing the effects of a deliberate policy mix: The case of technology and innovation advisory services and innovation vouchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    3. Lurdes Martins & Jorge Cerdeira & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2020. "Does corruption boost or harm firms’ performance in developing and emerging economies? A firm‐level study," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 2119-2152, August.
    4. Jean Acheson & Rory Malone, 2020. "Respect Your Elders: Evidence from Ireland’s R&D Tax Credit Reform," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 51(1), pages 105-131.
    5. Jose García‐Quevedo & Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Ester Martínez‐Ros, 2020. "Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2450-2464, September.
    6. Faggio, Giulia & Silva, Olmo, 2014. "Self-employment and entrepreneurship in urban and rural labour markets," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 67-85.
    7. Kashan, Alireza Javanmardi & Lay, Janine & Wiewiora, Anna & Bradley, Lisa, 2022. "The innovation process in mining: Integrating insights from innovation and change management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Broccardo, Laura & Tenucci, Andrea & Agarwal, Reeti & Alshibani, Safiya Mukhtar, 2024. "Steering digitalization and management control maturity in small and medium enterprises (SMEs)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. van Criekingen, Kristof & Freel, Mark & Czarnitzki, Dirk, 2021. "Open innovation deficiency: Evidence on project abandonment and delay," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-006, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2018. "Barriers to innovation in young and mature firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 181-206, January.
    11. Blind, Knut & Krieger, Bastian & Pellens, Maikel, 2022. "The interplay between product innovation, publishing, patenting and developing standards," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    12. Dragana Radicic, 2021. "Financial and Non-Financial Barriers to Innovation and the Degree of Radicalness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Hölzl, Werner & Janger, Jürgen, 2013. "Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1450-1468.
    14. Nieto, María Jesús & Santamaria, Luis & Bammens, Yannick, 2023. "Digitalization as a facilitator of open innovation: Are family firms different?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    15. Roberto Alvarez & Miguel A. Gonzalez, 2023. "Obstacles to Green Innovation: Evidence from Chilean Firms," Working Papers wp550, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    16. Fulvio Castellacci, 2014. "Service Firms Heterogeneity, International Collaborations and Export Participation," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 259-285, June.
    17. Nick Clifton & Khine S. Kyaw & Zheng Liu & Gary Walpole, 2024. "An Empirical Study on Public Sector versus Third Sector Circular Economy-Oriented Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    18. Spyros Arvanitis & Areti Gkypali & Kostas Tsekouras, 2014. "Knowledge Base, Exporting Activities, Innovation Openness and Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 14-361, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    19. Pablo D’Este & Alberto Marzucchi & Francesco Rentocchini, 2014. "Exploring and yet failing less: Learning from exploration, exploitation and human capital in R&D," SPRU Working Paper Series 2014-23, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Luisa Gagliardi & Simona Iammarino, 2017. "Innovation in risky markets. Multinational and domestic firms in the UK regions," Working Papers 37, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Mar 2017.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1368-:d:1500218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.