IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i9p5635-d1132258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on the Person-Centered Practice of Healthcare Professionals at an Inpatient Hospital Department: A Descriptive Study

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Alves Vareta

    (PhD Program, University of Lisbon (UL) and Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), 1600-214 Lisboa, Portugal
    Egas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Centre (CiiEM), Egas Moniz Universitary Institute, Quinta da Granja, 2829-511 Monte de Caparica, Portugal)

  • Célia Oliveira

    (Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), 1600-096 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Carlos Família

    (Egas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Centre (CiiEM), Egas Moniz Universitary Institute, Quinta da Granja, 2829-511 Monte de Caparica, Portugal
    Laboratory of Molecular Pathology and Forensic Biochemistry, Egas Moniz Universitary Institute, Quinta da Granja, 2829-511 Monte de Caparica, Portugal)

  • Filipa Ventura

    (The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA:E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000-076 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

The characteristics of health professionals and their understanding of person-centeredness may have important implications for the development of person-centered practice in specific care settings. In this study, we characterized the perceptions of the person-centered practice of a multidisciplinary team of health professionals working in the internal medicine inpatient unit of a Portuguese hospital. Data were collected using a brief sociodemographic and professional questionnaire and the person-centered practice inventory-staff (PCPI-S), and the effect of different sociodemographic and professional variables on each PCPI-S domain was determined using an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results showed that a person-centered practice was positively perceived in the major constructs of prerequisites (M = 4.12; SD = 0.36), the practice environment (M = 3.50; SD = 0.48), and person-centered process (M = 4.08; SD = 0.62) domains. The highest scored construct was developed interpersonal skills (M = 4.35; SD = 0.47), and the lowest was supportive organization systems (M = 3.08; SD = 0.80). Gender was found to influence the perceptions of knowing self (F(2,75) = 3.67, p = 0.03, partial η 2 = 0.089) and the physical environment (F(2,75) = 3.63, p = 0.03, partial η 2 = 0.088), as was profession on shared decision-making systems (F(2,75) = 5.38, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.125) and commitment to the job (F(2,75) = 5.27, p < 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.123), and the educational level on being professionally competent (F(1,75) = 4.99, p = 0.03, partial η 2 = 0.062) and having commitment to the job (F(2,75) = 4.49, p = 0.04, partial η 2 = 0.056). In addition, the PCPI-S proved to be a reliable instrument for characterizing healthcare professionals’ perceptions of the person-centeredness of care in this context. Identifying personal and professional variables that influence these perceptions could provide a starting point for defining strategies to move practice toward person-centeredness and for monitoring changes in healthcare practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Alves Vareta & Célia Oliveira & Carlos Família & Filipa Ventura, 2023. "Perspectives on the Person-Centered Practice of Healthcare Professionals at an Inpatient Hospital Department: A Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5635-:d:1132258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Júlio Belo Fernandes & Diana Vareta & Sónia Fernandes & Ana Silva Almeida & Dina Peças & Noélia Ferreira & Liliana Roldão, 2022. "Rehabilitation Workforce Challenges to Implement Person-Centered Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Tanya McCance & Brendan McCormack & Paul Slater & Donna McConnell, 2021. "Examining the Theoretical Relationship between Constructs in the Person-Centred Practice Framework: A Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Diana Alves Vareta & Filipa Ventura & Carlos Família & Célia Oliveira, 2022. "Person-Centered Practice in Hospitalized Older Adults with Chronic Illness: Clinical Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-8, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachida Handor & Anke Persoon & Famke van Lieshout & Marleen Lovink & Hester Vermeulen, 2022. "The Required Competencies of Bachelor- and Master-Educated Nurses in Facilitating the Development of an Effective Workplace Culture in Nursing Homes: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Martin McNamara & Marie Ward & Seán Paul Teeling, 2023. "Making a Sustainable Difference to People, Processes and Systems: Whole-Systems Approaches to Process Improvement in Health Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-5, March.
    3. Edwin Eshun & Orla Burke & Florence Do & Angus Maciver & Anushka Mathur & Cassie Mayne & Aashik Ahamed Mohamed Jemseed & Levente Novak & Anna Siddique & Eve Smith & David Tapia-Stocker & Alasdair Fitz, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Rehabilitation Medicine within an Inclusion Health Context: Examining a Population at Risk from Homelessness and Brain Injury in Edinburgh," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Júlia Saraiva & Gonçalo Rosa & Sónia Fernandes & Júlio Belo Fernandes, 2023. "Current Trends in Balance Rehabilitation for Stroke Survivors: A Scoping Review of Experimental Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-15, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5635-:d:1132258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.