IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i7p5279-d1108814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Networks, New Technologies, and Wellbeing—An Interview Study on Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Successful Ageing

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Betlej

    (Centre of Sociological Research on the Economy and the Internet, The Department of Economic and Digital Sociology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Many factors are considered vital in supporting successful ageing and older adults’ wellbeing. Whilst evidence exists around facilitating and hindering factors in the general use of various forms of institutional and family support and personal development-oriented education and/or new technologies, evidence is limited with regards to older people’s motivations, expectations, and experiences surrounding ageing. Hence, in this study, the author used a qualitative explanatory method to interpret the factors influencing seniors’ successful ageing. The author’s focus was on how seniors experience ageing. The second issue was how they have been organizing life in old age. The third point concerned their expectations towards ageing now and in the future. Thirteen older adults (60+) were interviewed nationwide using a semi-structured scenario tool. Their objective was to give rich descriptions of their experiences of ageing. The interviews revealed the older adults’ own experiences and enabled an understanding of their motivations, perceptions, moderators, and expectations around successful ageing. Based on the analysis of the qualitative data, the author developed three main themes, each with its own sub-themes: 1. Life satisfaction (transitioning to retirement, using coping strategies in adaptation to negative changes, reaching personal goals, leading a meaningful life); 2. Supportive environments (being independent but using temporary assistance from relatives and/or people close to oneself, living with family members (e.g., husband or wife, children, grandchildren), having access to health care system); 3. Social integration (social relations, social engagement, independence in using technological advancements). The main categories that emerged from the three themes were social networks, new technologies, and wellbeing. To analyze these issues, the author used a sociological approach. The theoretic explorations were embedded mainly in two methods: criticism of writing and the analytical and comparative one.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Betlej, 2023. "Social Networks, New Technologies, and Wellbeing—An Interview Study on Factors Influencing Older Adults’ Successful Ageing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5279-:d:1108814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/7/5279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/7/5279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annette Meng & Emil Sundstrup & Lars L. Andersen, 2020. "Factors Contributing to Retirement Decisions in Denmark: Comparing Employees Who Expect to Retire before, at, and after the State Pension Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Maria Miguel Barbosa & Laetitia Teixeira & Constança Paúl & Javier Yanguas & Rosa Marina Afonso, 2022. "Caring and Working during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspective of Portuguese Residential Care Facility Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Yan-Ting Liu & Yao-Dong Zhou & Jiao-Li Cai, 2023. "Effects of Health Status on the Labor Supply of Older Adults with Different Socioeconomic Status," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Reuben D. Rusk, 2022. "An Adaptive Motivation Approach to Understanding the ‘How’ and ‘Why’ of Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Hila Axelrad & Israel Luski & Miki Malul, 2017. "Reservation Wages and the Unemployment of Older Workers," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 206-227, June.
    6. Kristina Thomassen & Emil Sundstrup & Jonas Vinstrup & Karina Glies Vincents Seeberg & Lars Louis Andersen, 2022. "Barriers and Facilitators of Re-Employment among Senior Workers: Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-7, September.
    7. Alina Betlej, 2022. "Designing Robots for Elderly from the Perspective of Potential End-Users: A Sociological Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Grzegorz Kinelski & Jakub Stęchły & Piotr Bartkowiak, 2022. "Various Facets of Sustainable Smart City Management: Selected Examples from Polish Metropolitan Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristina Thomassen & Emil Sundstrup & Jonas Vinstrup & Karina Glies Vincents Seeberg & Lars Louis Andersen, 2022. "Barriers and Facilitators of Re-Employment among Senior Workers: Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-7, September.
    2. Alina Betlej & Jan Gondek & Natalia Gondek, 2023. "Ageing and Keeping Pace with Technology: A Grounded Theory Study on Blind Adults’ Experiences of Adapting to New Technologies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Iñigo Calvo-Sotomayor & Ekhi Atutxa & Ricardo Aguado, 2020. "Who Is Afraid of Population Aging? Myths, Challenges and an Open Question from the Civil Economy Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Xuhang Shen & Ziqi Wang & Shi Li, 2023. "Access to Piped Water and Off-Farm Work Participation: Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Aleksandra Kuzior & Dariusz Krawczyk & Paulina Brożek & Olena Pakhnenko & Tetyana Vasylieva & Serhiy Lyeonov, 2022. "Resilience of Smart Cities to the Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Kristina Thomassen & Emil Sundstrup & Sebastian V. Skovlund & Lars L. Andersen, 2020. "Barriers and Willingness to Accept Re-Employment among Unemployed Senior Workers: The SeniorWorkingLife Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-9, July.
    7. Denise Burkhalter & Aylin Wagner & Sonja Feer & Frank Wieber & Andreas Ihle & Isabel Baumann, 2022. "Financial Reasons for Working beyond the Statutory Retirement Age: Risk Factors and Associations with Health in Late Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Tomasz Jedynak, 2022. "Does the Formulation of the Decision Problem Affect Retirement?—Framing Effect and Planned Retirement Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-30, February.
    9. Marzena Czarnecka & Katarzyna Chudy–Laskowska & Grzegorz Kinelski & Grzegorz Lew & Beata Sadowska & Magdalena Wójcik-Jurkiewicz & Borys Budka, 2022. "Grants and Funding for the Processes of Decarbonization in the Scope of Sustainability Development—The Case from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Annette Meng & Emil Sundstrup & Lars L. Andersen, 2022. "Employee perception of managers’ attitudes towards older workers is associated with risk of loss of paid work before state pension age: prospective cohort study with register follow-up," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1375-1383, December.
    11. Hila Axelrad & Miki Malul & Israel Luski, 2018. "Unemployment among younger and older individuals: does conventional data about unemployment tell us the whole story?," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 52(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5279-:d:1108814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.