IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p5033-d1095364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Plantar Tactile Sensitivity in Older Women after Conventional Proprioceptive Training and Exergame

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Henrique Meira Mascarenhas

    (Graduate Program in Nursing and Health, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), Jequié 45210-506, Brazil)

  • José Ailton Oliveira Carneiro

    (Graduate Program in Nursing and Health, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), Jequié 45210-506, Brazil
    Post-Graduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), Jequié 45210-506, Brazil)

  • Thaiza Teixeira Xavier Nobre

    (PPG QUALISAÚDE: Quality in Health Services and Patient Safety, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59200-000, Brazil)

  • Ludmila Schettino

    (Graduate Program in Nursing and Health, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), Jequié 45210-506, Brazil)

  • Claudineia Matos de Araujo

    (Graduate Program in Nursing and Health, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), Jequié 45210-506, Brazil)

  • Luciana Araújo dos Reis

    (Graduate Program in Nursing and Health, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), Jequié 45210-506, Brazil)

  • Marcos Henrique Fernandes

    (Graduate Program in Nursing and Health, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB), Jequié 45210-506, Brazil)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of conventional proprioceptive training and games with motion monitoring on plantar tactile sensitivity in older women. Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial, with 50 older women randomized into three groups: conventional proprioception (n = 17), games with motion monitoring (n = 16), and the control (n = 17). They underwent 24 intervention sessions, three times a week, for eight weeks. The conventional proprioception group performed exercises involving gait, balance, and proprioception. The games performed by the motion monitoring group included exercises using the Xbox Kinect One video game from Microsoft ® . The evaluation of tactile pressure sensitivity was performed using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. Intragroup comparisons between the two paired samples were performed using paired Student’s t -test or Wilcoxon test. Intergroup comparisons between the three independent samples were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc test, with p ≤ 0.05. Results: The older women submitted to conventional games with motion monitoring training and showed improvement in plantar tactile sensitivity in the right and left feet. When comparing the intergroup results, the two training modalities obtained an improvement in the plantar tactile sensitivity of the older women when compared to the control group. Conclusions: We conclude that both training modalities may favor the improvement of plantar tactile sensitivity in older women, with no significant differences between conventional and virtual training.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Henrique Meira Mascarenhas & José Ailton Oliveira Carneiro & Thaiza Teixeira Xavier Nobre & Ludmila Schettino & Claudineia Matos de Araujo & Luciana Araújo dos Reis & Marcos Henrique Fernandes, 2023. "Analysis of Plantar Tactile Sensitivity in Older Women after Conventional Proprioceptive Training and Exergame," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5033-:d:1095364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5033/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5033/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bárbara-Mariana Gutiérrez-Pérez & Antonio-Víctor Martín-García & Alicia Murciano-Hueso & Ana-Paula Oliveira Cardoso, 2023. "Use of serious games with older adults: systematic literature review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5033-:d:1095364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.