IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4564-d1087668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Level of Anxiety and Depression in Caregivers of Children Benefiting from Neurorehabilitation Services

Author

Listed:
  • Lidia Perenc

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College, University of Rzeszow, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Justyna Podgórska-Bednarz

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College, University of Rzeszow, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Guzik

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College, University of Rzeszow, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Mariusz Drużbicki

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College, University of Rzeszow, 35-310 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

Introduction: At the turn of March and April 2020, due to the occurrence of COVID-19 in Poland, the first restrictions on the provision of rehabilitation services were introduced. Nevertheless, caregivers strived to ensure that their children could benefit from rehabilitation services. Aim of the study: To determine which of the selected data presented in the media reflecting the intensity of the COVID-19 epidemic in Poland differentiated the level of anxiety and depression in caregivers of children benefiting from neurorehabilitation services. Material and methods: The study group consisted of caregivers of children ( n = 454) receiving various neurorehabilitation services in the inpatient ward of Neurological Rehabilitation of Children and Adolescents ( n = 200, 44%), in the Neurorehabilitation Day Ward ( n = 168, 37%), and in the Outpatient Clinic ( n = 86, 19%) of the Clinical Regional Rehabilitation and Education Center in Rzeszow. The average age of the respondents was 37.23 ± 7.14 years. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure the severity of anxiety and depression in caregivers of children. The questionnaires were distributed from June 2020 to April 2021. As a measure of the severity of the COVID-19 epidemic in Poland, the figures presented in the media were adopted. In addition, data on the COVID-19 pandemic presented in the media (Wikipedia, TVP Info, Polsat Nes, Radio Zet) on the day preceding the completion of the survey were analyzed based on statistical analysis methods. Results: 73 of the surveyed caregivers (16.08%) suffered from severe anxiety disorders, and 21 (4.63%) from severe depressive disorders. The average severity of anxiety (HADS) in the subjects was 6.37 points, and the average severity of depression was 4.09 points. There was no statistically significant relationship between the data presented in the media—such as daily number of infections, total number of infections, daily number of deaths, total number of deaths, total number of recoveries, number of hospitalizations, and people under quarantine—and the level of anxiety and depression of the studied caregivers ( p > 0.05). Conclusions: It was not found that the selected data presented in the media, showing the intensity of the COVID-19 epidemic in Poland, significantly differentiated the level of anxiety and depression among caregivers of children using neurorehabilitation services. Their motivation to continue the treatment, caused by concern for their children’s health, resulted in less severe symptoms of anxiety and depression during the peak period of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Lidia Perenc & Justyna Podgórska-Bednarz & Agnieszka Guzik & Mariusz Drużbicki, 2023. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Level of Anxiety and Depression in Caregivers of Children Benefiting from Neurorehabilitation Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4564-:d:1087668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4564/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4564/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karolina Oleksa-Marewska & Joanna Tokar, 2022. "Facing the Post-Pandemic Challenges: The Role of Leadership Effectiveness in Shaping the Affective Well-Being of Healthcare Providers Working in a Hybrid Work Mode," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Zhu, Bangren & Zheng, Xinqi & Liu, Haiyan & Li, Jiayang & Wang, Peipei, 2020. "Analysis of spatiotemporal characteristics of big data on social media sentiment with COVID-19 epidemic topics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongqiang Zhao & Liwei Zhang, 2022. "An Advanced Study of Urban Emergency Medical Equipment Logistics Distribution for Different Levels of Urgency Demand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Kirsten Barnicot & Rose McCabe & Angeliki Bogosian & Renos Papadopoulos & Mike Crawford & Peter Aitken & Tanja Christensen & Jonathan Wilson & Bonnie Teague & Ravi Rana & Donna Willis & Ryan Barclay &, 2023. "Predictors of Post-Traumatic Growth in a Sample of United Kingdom Mental and Community Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Hainan Huang & Weifan Chen & Tian Xie & Yaoyao Wei & Ziqing Feng & Weijiong Wu, 2021. "The Impact of Individual Behaviors and Governmental Guidance Measures on Pandemic-Triggered Public Sentiment Based on System Dynamics and Cross-Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Iustina Alina Boitan & Emilia Mioara Campeanu & Sanja Sever Malis, 2021. "Economic Sentiment Perceptions During COVID-19 Pandemic – A European Cross-Country Impact Assessment," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(Special15), pages 982-982, November.
    5. Zijing Ye & Ruisi Li & Jing Wu, 2022. "Dynamic Demand Evaluation of COVID-19 Medical Facilities in Wuhan Based on Public Sentiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Qiang Wang & Min Su & Min Zhang & Rongrong Li, 2021. "Integrating Digital Technologies and Public Health to Fight Covid-19 Pandemic: Key Technologies, Applications, Challenges and Outlook of Digital Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-50, June.
    7. Liu, Jia & Bai, Jinyu & Wu, Desheng, 2021. "Medical supplies scheduling in major public health emergencies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Luanying Li & Lin Hua & Fei Gao, 2022. "What We Ask about When We Ask about Quarantine? Content and Sentiment Analysis on Online Help-Seeking Posts during COVID-19 on a Q&A Platform in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Wen-zhong Shi & Fanxin Zeng & Anshu Zhang & Chengzhuo Tong & Xiaoqi Shen & Zhewei Liu & Zhicheng Shi, 2022. "Online public opinion during the first epidemic wave of COVID-19 in China based on Weibo data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Israel Edem Agbehadji & Bankole Osita Awuzie & Alfred Beati Ngowi, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Waves: 4IR Technology Utilisation in Multi-Sector Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Adnan Muhammad Shah & Rizwan Ali Naqvi & Ok-Ran Jeong, 2021. "Detecting Topic and Sentiment Trends in Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of Online Reviews Using 3-Wave Datasets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Patricia Tegtmeier & Corinna Weber & Sabine Sommer & Anita Tisch & Sascha Wischniewski, 2022. "Criteria and Guidelines for Human-Centered Work Design in a Digitally Transformed World of Work: Findings from a Formal Consensus Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-31, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4564-:d:1087668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.