IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1767-d1039920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small Changes in Patient Arrival and Consultation Times Have Large Effects on Patients’ Waiting Times: Simulation Analyses for Primary Care

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Grot

    (Institute of Management, Operations Research, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Simon Kugai

    (Institute for General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany)

  • Lukas Degen

    (Institute for General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany)

  • Isabel Wiemer

    (Institute of Management, Operations Research, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Brigitte Werners

    (Institute of Management, Operations Research, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany)

  • Birgitta M. Weltermann

    (Institute for General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany)

Abstract

(1) Background: Workflows are a daily challenge in general practices. The desired smooth work processes and patient flows are not easy to achieve. This study uses an operational research approach to illustrate the general effects of patient arrival and consultation times on waiting times. (2) Methods: Stochastic simulations were used to model complex daily workflows of general practice. Following classical queuing models, patient arrivals, queuing discipline, and physician consultation times are three key factors influencing work processes. (3) Results: In the first scenario, with patients arriving every 7.6 min and random consultation times, the individual patients’ maximum waiting time increased to more than 200 min. The second scenario with random patient arrivals and random consultation times increased the average waiting time by up to 30 min compared to patients arriving on schedule. A busy morning session based on the second scenario was investigated to compare two alternative intervention strategies to reduce subsequent waiting times. Both could reduce waiting times by a multiple for each minute of reduced consultation time. (4) Conclusions: Aiming to improve family physicians’ awareness of strategies for improving workflows, this simulation study illustrates the effects of strategies that address consultation times and patient arrivals.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Grot & Simon Kugai & Lukas Degen & Isabel Wiemer & Brigitte Werners & Birgitta M. Weltermann, 2023. "Small Changes in Patient Arrival and Consultation Times Have Large Effects on Patients’ Waiting Times: Simulation Analyses for Primary Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1767-:d:1039920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexopoulos, Christos & Goldsman, David & Fontanesi, John & Kopald, David & Wilson, James R., 2008. "Modeling patient arrivals in community clinics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 33-43, February.
    2. Lara Wiesche & Matthias Schacht & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "Strategies for interday appointment scheduling in primary care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 403-418, September.
    3. Guido Kaandorp & Ger Koole, 2007. "Optimal outpatient appointment scheduling," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 217-229, September.
    4. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    5. Kong, Qingxia & Lee, Chung-Yee & Teo, Chung-Piaw & Zheng, Zhichao, 2016. "Appointment sequencing: Why the Smallest-Variance-First rule may not be optimal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 809-821.
    6. Song-Hee Kim & Ward Whitt & Won Chul Cha, 2018. "A Data-Driven Model of an Appointment-Generated Arrival Process at an Outpatient Clinic," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 181-199, February.
    7. Kuiper, Alex & de Mast, Jeroen & Mandjes, Michel, 2021. "The problem of appointment scheduling in outpatient clinics: A multiple case study of clinical practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Tugba Cayirli & Kum Khiong Yang & Ser Aik Quek, 2012. "A Universal Appointment Rule in the Presence of No‐Shows and Walk‐Ins," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 21(4), pages 682-697, July.
    9. Anja Viehmann & Christine Kersting & Anika Thielmann & Birgitta Weltermann, 2017. "Prevalence of chronic stress in general practitioners and practice assistants: Personal, practice and regional characteristics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Xueqi & Zhou, Shenghai, 2022. "Sequencing and scheduling appointments on multiple servers with stochastic service durations and customer arrivals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Guo, Hainan & Xie, Yue & Jiang, Bowen & Tang, Jiafu, 2024. "When outpatient appointment meets online consultation: A joint scheduling optimization framework," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Creemers, Stefan & Lambrecht, Marc R. & Beliën, Jeroen & Van den Broeke, Maud, 2021. "Evaluation of appointment scheduling rules: A multi-performance measurement approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. T. Meersman & B. Maenhout, 2022. "Multi-objective optimisation for constructing cyclic appointment schedules for elective and urgent patients," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 909-948, May.
    5. Christos Zacharias & Tallys Yunes, 2020. "Multimodularity in the Stochastic Appointment Scheduling Problem with Discrete Arrival Epochs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 744-763, February.
    6. Yong-Hong Kuo & Hari Balasubramanian & Yan Chen, 2020. "Medical appointment overbooking and optimal scheduling: tradeoffs between schedule efficiency and accessibility to service," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 72-101, March.
    7. Deceuninck, Matthias & Fiems, Dieter & De Vuyst, Stijn, 2018. "Outpatient scheduling with unpunctual patients and no-shows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 195-207.
    8. Oualid Jouini & Saif Benjaafar & Bingnan Lu & Siqiao Li & Benjamin Legros, 2022. "Appointment-driven queueing systems with non-punctual customers," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 1-56, June.
    9. Cai, Yun & Song, Haiqing & Wang, Shan, 2024. "Managing appointment-based services with electronic visits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 863-878.
    10. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović & Nikolaos Trichakis & Sarah Kadish & Ryan Leib & Craig A. Bunnell, 2020. "Data-Driven Appointment-Scheduling Under Uncertainty: The Case of an Infusion Unit in a Cancer Center," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 243-270, January.
    11. Shenghai Zhou & Yichuan Ding & Woonghee Tim Huh & Guohua Wan, 2021. "Constant Job‐Allowance Policies for Appointment Scheduling: Performance Bounds and Numerical Analysis," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2211-2231, July.
    12. Pan, Xingwei & Geng, Na & Xie, Xiaolan, 2021. "Appointment scheduling and real-time sequencing strategies for patient unpunctuality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 246-260.
    13. Shen, Zuo-Jun Max & Xie, Jingui & Zheng, Zhichao & Zhou, Han, 2023. "Dynamic scheduling with uncertain job types," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1047-1060.
    14. Li Luo & Ying Zhou & Bernard T. Han & Jialing Li, 2019. "An optimization model to determine appointment scheduling window for an outpatient clinic with patient no-shows," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 68-84, March.
    15. Kuiper, Alex & Mandjes, Michel, 2015. "Appointment scheduling in tandem-type service systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PB), pages 145-156.
    16. Gang Du & Xinyue Li & Hui Hu & Xiaoling Ouyang, 2018. "Optimizing Daily Service Scheduling for Medical Diagnostic Equipment Considering Patient Satisfaction and Hospital Revenue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    17. Pan, Xingwei & Geng, Na & Xie, Xiaolan & Wen, Jing, 2020. "Managing appointments with waiting time targets and random walk-ins," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    18. De Vuyst, Stijn & Bruneel, Herwig & Fiems, Dieter, 2014. "Computationally efficient evaluation of appointment schedules in health care," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1142-1154.
    19. Tugba Cayirli & Kum Khiong Yang, 2019. "Altering the Environment to Improve Appointment System Performance," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 138-154, June.
    20. Tunçalp, Feray & Güneş, Evrim D. & Örmeci, E. Lerzan, 2024. "Modeling strategic walk-in patients in appointment systems: Equilibrium behavior and capacity allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 587-601.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1767-:d:1039920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.