IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p916-d1024871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Determinants of Quality of Life Differ in Older People Living in the Community and Nursing Homes?

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Pigłowska

    (Department of Geriatrics, Healthy Ageing Research Centre, Medical University of Łódź, Hallera 1 Square, 90-647 Łódź, Poland)

  • Tomasz Kostka

    (Department of Geriatrics, Healthy Ageing Research Centre, Medical University of Łódź, Hallera 1 Square, 90-647 Łódź, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Guligowska

    (Department of Geriatrics, Healthy Ageing Research Centre, Medical University of Łódź, Hallera 1 Square, 90-647 Łódź, Poland)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to examine and compare the relationship between nutritional status, physical activity (PA) level, concomitant chronic diseases, and quality of life (QoL) in community-dwelling (CD) older people and nursing home (NH) residents. Material and Methods: One hundred NH residents aged 60 years and above and one hundred sex- and age-matched CD older adults were examined. The QoL was examined with the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. Nutritional status was assessed with the Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire (MNA), anthropometric measures, and bioimpedance analysis (BIA). The 7-Day Recall Questionnaire and the Stanford Usual Activity Questionnaire were performed to evaluate the PA energy expenditure level (PA-EE) and the health-related behaviours (PA-HRB), respectively. Results: CD subjects presented a significantly higher self-assessment in the VAS scale in comparison with NH residents (CD: 65.3 ± 19.4 vs. NH 58.2 ± 21.4; p < 0.05), but there were no differences within the five dimensions of QoL. In NH patients, the VAS scale was not correlated with any of the variables evaluating the nutritional status and body composition, while in the CD group correlated positively with MNA (rS = 0.36; p < 0.001), % of FFM (rS = 0.22; p < 0.05), body density (rS = 0.22; p < 0.05) and negatively with % of FM (rS = −0.22; p < 0.05). In an institutional environment, only concomitant diseases (mainly urinary incontinence) were found as independent determinants for QoL. In the community, independent determinants of QoL besides concomitant diseases (mainly ischaemic heart disease) were nutritional status or PA-HRB. Conclusions: Determinants of QoL are different depending on the living environment the older adults. Proper nutritional status and beneficial PA behaviours, are crucial for higher QoL of CD elderly, while for NH residents, the main determinants of QoL are chronic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Pigłowska & Tomasz Kostka & Agnieszka Guligowska, 2023. "Do Determinants of Quality of Life Differ in Older People Living in the Community and Nursing Homes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:916-:d:1024871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/916/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/916/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen M van Leeuwen & Miriam S van Loon & Fenna A van Nes & Judith E Bosmans & Henrica C W de Vet & Johannes C F Ket & Guy A M Widdershoven & Raymond W J G Ostelo, 2019. "What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-39, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Weber & Thiemo Schnorr & Mareike Morat & Tobias Morat & Lars Donath, 2020. "Effects of Mind–Body Interventions Involving Meditative Movements on Quality of Life, Depressive Symptoms, Fear of Falling and Sleep Quality in Older Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Mihaela Ghența & Aniela Matei & Luise Mladen-Macovei & Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Elen-Silvana Bobârnat, 2021. "Sustainable Care and Factors Associated with Quality of Life among Older Beneficiaries of Social Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Krittiya Kantachote & Nathakhun Wiroonsri, 2023. "Octa-Cluster: Different Perspectives on Quality of Life in Thailand," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    4. Ali Alattas & Farag Shuweihdi & Kate Best & Silviya Nikolova & Robert West, 2024. "Measurement Invariance of a Quality-of-life Measure, CASP-12, within the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA)," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(5), pages 2155-2170, October.
    5. Ching-Yi Chen, 2022. "Analysing the Quality of Life of Older Adults: Heterogeneity, COVID-19 Lockdown, and Residential Stability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Eleni-Marina Ashikali & Catherine Ludwig & Laura Mastromauro & Samuel Périvier & Aude Tholomier & Irina Ionita & Christophe Graf & Catherine Busnel, 2023. "Intrinsic Capacities, Functional Ability, Physiological Systems, and Caregiver Support: A Targeted Synthesis of Effective Interventions and International Recommendations for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Chiara Costi, 2022. "Health and quality of life in aging populations: A structural equation modeling approach," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2022 11, Stata Users Group.
    8. Eun Jeong Hwang, 2022. "Analysis of Factors Associated with Subjective Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) among Older Adults Resident in the Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-11, August.
    9. Hackert, Mariska Q.N. & van Exel, Job & Brouwer, Werner B.F., 2020. "Well-being of Older People (WOOP): Quantitative validation of a new outcome measure for use in economic evaluations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    10. Himmler, Sebastian & Jonker, Marcel & van Krugten, Frédérique & Hackert, Mariska & van Exel, Job & Brouwer, Werner, 2022. "Estimating an anchored utility tariff for the well-being of older people measure (WOOP) for the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    11. Ma. Nita Bolo & Deborah Natalia Singson, 2023. "Throwback, trials, and triumphs: stories of unmarried retired Filipina Public School teachers," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 44(1), pages 804-852, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:916-:d:1024871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.