IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1070-d1028115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence on Neurotoxicity after Intrauterine and Childhood Exposure to Organomercurials

Author

Listed:
  • Lara Ferreira Azevedo

    (Department of Clinical Analyses, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-903, SP, Brazil)

  • Nina Karpova

    (Department of Clinical Analyses, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-903, SP, Brazil)

  • Bruno Alves Rocha

    (Department of Clinical Analyses, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-903, SP, Brazil)

  • Fernando Barbosa Junior

    (Department of Clinical Analyses, Toxicology and Food Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-903, SP, Brazil)

  • Glenda Carolyn Gobe

    (Kidney Disease Research Group, School of Medicine, Translational Research Institute, University of Queensland, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia)

  • Maria Fernanda Hornos Carneiro

    (Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

Abstract

Although the molecular mechanisms underlying methylmercury toxicity are not entirely understood, the observed neurotoxicity in early-life is attributed to the covalent binding of methylmercury to sulfhydryl (thiol) groups of proteins and other molecules being able to affect protein post-translational modifications from numerous molecular pathways, such as glutamate signaling, heat-shock chaperones and the antioxidant glutaredoxin/glutathione system. However, for other organomercurials such as ethylmercury or thimerosal, there is not much information available. Therefore, this review critically discusses current knowledge about organomercurials neurotoxicity—both methylmercury and ethylmercury—following intrauterine and childhood exposure, as well as the prospects and future needs for research in this area. Contrasting with the amount of epidemiological evidence available for methylmercury, there are only a few in vivo studies reporting neurotoxic outcomes and mechanisms of toxicity for ethylmercury or thimerosal. There is also a lack of studies on mechanistic approaches to better investigate the pathways involved in the potential neurotoxicity caused by both organomercurials. More impactful follow-up studies, especially following intrauterine and childhood exposure to ethylmercury, are necessary. Childhood vaccination is critically important for controlling infectious diseases; however, the safety of mercury-containing thimerosal and, notably, its effectiveness as preservative in vaccines are still under debate regarding its potential dose-response effects to the central nervous system.

Suggested Citation

  • Lara Ferreira Azevedo & Nina Karpova & Bruno Alves Rocha & Fernando Barbosa Junior & Glenda Carolyn Gobe & Maria Fernanda Hornos Carneiro, 2023. "Evidence on Neurotoxicity after Intrauterine and Childhood Exposure to Organomercurials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1070-:d:1028115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1070/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1070/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janet K. Kern & Boyd E. Haley & David A. Geier & Lisa K. Sykes & Paul G. King & Mark R. Geier, 2013. "Thimerosal Exposure and the Role of Sulfation Chemistry and Thiol Availability in Autism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Baker, J.P., 2008. "Mercury, vaccines, and autism: One controversy, three histories," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(2), pages 244-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vulpe, Simona - Nicoleta & Rughinis, Cosima, 2021. "Social amplification of risk and “probable vaccine damage”:A typology of vaccination beliefs in 28 European countries," MPRA Paper 105949, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. José G. Dórea, 2015. "Exposure to Mercury and Aluminum in Early Life: Developmental Vulnerability as a Modifying Factor in Neurologic and Immunologic Effects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Zhai, Yujia & Sun, Shaojing & Wang, Fang & Ding, Ying, 2017. "Multiplicity and uncertainty: Media coverage of autism causation," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 873-887.
    4. Vulpe, Simona - Nicoleta & Rughinis, Cosima, 2021. "The alternative fact of “probable vaccine damage”: A typology of vaccination beliefs in 28 European countries," MPRA Paper 105647, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Mengcen Qian & Shin-Yi Chou & Ernest K. Lai, 2020. "Confirmatory Bias in Health Decisions: Evidence from the MMR-Autism Controversy," NBER Working Papers 26772, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Qian, Mengcen & Chou, Shin-Yi & Lai, Ernest K., 2020. "Confirmatory bias in health decisions: Evidence from the MMR-autism controversy," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. David A. Geier & Brian S. Hooker & Janet K. Kern & Paul G. King & Lisa K. Sykes & Mark R. Geier, 2014. "A Dose-Response Relationship between Organic Mercury Exposure from Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines and Neurodevelopmental Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Laurie A. Drapela & Dana Lee Baker, 2014. "Policy Awareness, Financial Hardship, and Work Impact," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1070-:d:1028115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.